US Proposals For Secret TPP 'Son Of ACTA' Treaty Leaked; Chock Full Of Awful Ideas
from the exporting-protectionism dept
We've mentioned a couple of times that now that ACTA is "complete", if not yet approved, USTR negotiators have moved on to what many are calling the son of ACTA in the form of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). The USTR has shown what it's learned from the ACTA negotiations: which is that it can absolutely get away with unprecedented levels of secrecy. It has no problem sharing details with industry representatives, but the public and consumers who will be most impacted by the intellectual property rules found in TPP are kept completely away. However, as with ACTA, there are leaks. KEI has been able to get a leaked version of the current proposal from the USTR, and as we'd been hearing, it really is another industry wish-list of stricter anti-consumer intellectual property rules, that go well beyond current US law. This is the entertainment industry and the pharma industry trying to bypass the actual law-making process and using "friends" within the USTR to get such rules in place via secretive, non-democratic, treaty making processes. It's really a sickening display of crony capitalism and regulatory capture at work. Anyone working in the USTR should be ashamed of this document.The early reports on TPP was that the USTR would only consider ratcheting up intellectual property laws to more draconian states. It would not even consider the idea of decreasing the already too strict levels of intellectual property laws. It also would not bother with increasing consumer protections or important exceptions to stronger intellectual property law -- even if it's been shown that those exceptions have a much greater impact on the economy than the IP laws themselves.
Some key points:
- It would require that countries participating ban parallel import for any copyright holder who wants it. That is, if a copyright holder says no, countries would have to block your ability to purchase legal and authorized products in one country and import them into another. This is the so-called "grey market" which should be perfectly legal, but which many companies would like to block so they can price things much higher in some countries.
- It would require criminal enforcement for certain cases of circumventing DRM even when there's no copyright infringement, going beyond existing treaties even when there's no copyright infringement. There are some exceptions, but rather than allow countries to determine their own exceptions, it defines the exceptions and actually says countries cannot go beyond those.
- It would impose liability on ISPs for dealing with infringing works that goes well beyond the DMCA. Yes, Hollywood may finally be able to force ISPs to act as their personal business model cops -- something they've been unable to do in the US.
- Along those lines, there would be "legal incentives" for ISPs to go above and beyond that in helping copyright holders.
- Forget privacy. ISPs would be required to identify users on request, going well beyond existing law.
- Expand what is considered patentable, going in the opposite direction of what's needed. Most troubling, it would allow patents on inventions even if the inventions do "not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that product." This seems to go against the very purpose of patent law, but the USTR has already shown it couldn't care much less than actually obeying the Constitutional underpinnings of patents or copyright law.
- Continues the troubling and problematic idea that patents must be assumed valid, even if they were only briefly reviewed.
- A requirement to forbid third party opposition of patent applications. This is particularly ridiculous. Allowing third parties to oppose patent applications (as is allowed with trademarks) would certainly help prevent some really bad patent applications from getting through. How can the USTR justify not allowing such a basic concept of letting third parties point out bad patents before they're approved. Especially when you combine this with the "presumption of validity" in patents once granted, it looks like the USTR is trying to increase the rubber stamping of patent approvals.
Declassify on: Four years from entry into force of the TPP agreement or, if no agreement enters into force, four years from the close of the negotiations.Oh yeah, as for things like consumer protections or safeguards for competition? KEI correctly summarizes that they are "weak, meak or missing." That's because this document isn't about enabling competition, innovation or consumer benefit. It's about helping out a few legacy companies who don't want to compete, and who have plenty of job openings ready for the folks involved in these negotiations down the road.
* This document must be protected from unauthorized disclosure, but may be mailed or transmitted over unclassified e-mail or fax, discussed over unsecured phone lines, and stored on unclassified computer systems. It must be stored in a locked or secured building, room, or container.
If you find this to be a disgusting display of regulatory capture, done in secret, for the benefit of a few companies, against the basic principles of the free market and consumer rights, you should speak up. The EFF has put together details of which elected officials should be contacted to pressure the USTR to open up these proceedings and to hear from the public on their proposal. They've also set up a form to let you contact your elected official, though I recommend you write your own version of any letter, rather than sticking with the boilerplate. None of my elected representatives are on the target list, but if yours are, please contact them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How old is this saying?
Also: "meek" not "meak"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Still absolutely pathetic and depressing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AC madlibs
1. An insult
2. A half-truth
3. A quote from MM or your favorite poster
4. A villain
5. Another insult
6. and one widely debunked "fact"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AC madlibs
"_____3____" you keep saying this even though I proved you wrong weeks ago.
Stop supporting ______4_____ you _____5____.
____6____ sorry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: AC madlibs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Just trust us, we'll give you all the details you need to know!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Irrelevant
Everyone knows that the consumer is the grassroots part of any economic model and if the grass is not watered properly then it either dies or goes into conservation mode until better weather comes along.
Considering these rules are really not constitutional in our nation we can freely ignore them and other countries will ignore them the a greater or lesser degree as well.
What I see this as is yet another way for America to dictate to the rest of the world how trade will work. America, you do not have the right to dictate how the world economic model will evolve, you only have the right to your opinion.
Some of us here in America have already gotten over it and are happily planning a wonderful future in the current digital age of abundance and the coming real world age of abundance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
...Four years after you can do anything about it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AC madlibs
"_____3____" you keep saying this even though I proved you wrong weeks ago.
Stop supporting ______4_____ you _____5____.
____6____ sorry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: AC madlibs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
eternal circle..
leaked....which means..OMG piracy!!!!
thats (/random) fifty five billion in lost erm..sales....or something.....
Aside from that, its actually (and this is serious) becoming risky for a consumer to even buy something legally...as there is a risk of getting sued by all these third-party liability wannabees.
OMG you bought film xyz....but we intend to sue the makers for infringement of our copyright (using light to make the actors visible)....and firstly you WATCHED the film....then you had the nerve to make a copy of it IN YOUR BRAIN....but you added some bits...so you created an illegal derivative work of what we consider to also be illegal.
Please pay us $1000 under the terms of the hollywood&rich people know best act or we will be forced to pretend to be cops and kick your door in and start confiscating things.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
That said, we're currently working with Joe Bidden, who's trying to convince Al Gore to uninvent the Internet. Thats right, our scientists have discovered the truth about piracy. As it turns out, the only way to win this war, is to shut down the internet. Many people forget that there was a time before the internet. It's destroyed secrecy, it violated monopolies, exposed corruption and exultantly, the American way of life. It's a tough row to hoe but I believe that with enough money and power we can send pirates back to bootlegging 8-tracks!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Classified
> unauthorized disclosure, but may be mailed
> or transmitted over unclassified e-mail or
> fax, discussed over unsecured phone lines
Just a technical point, Mike. If the information can be transmitted over unencrypted lines or discussed outside of a SCIF, then it's not classified.
This would be labeled "Sensitive But Unclassified" information, which is pretty common in the government. Most routine law enforcement information (criminal histories, raid plans, security assessments, etc.) are SBU information. Not classified, but not something you want to boradcast to the general public, either.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
People should be forced to vote for someone like you. That would show them...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
Fairness for creators, fairness for for those benefitting from their creations.
And diddley-squat for middlemen who are no longer wanted or needed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i think its time to send angry emails to every political figure who "represents" ur interests
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"details of which elected officials should be contacted.....Orrin G. Hatch, UT"
-__-"
i dont think he reads mail from anyone younger then 80
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Also some of the provisions create a situation where the sovereignty of the country and citizenship is beholden to the USA Govt which I will be one of the the first Aussie's and definately not the last to declare war on the USA. And no that's not a joke. If the USG wants to associate us with terrorists for that. So be it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shame? What shame?
==============================
Well if they felt shame then they very well couldn't get filthy rich on kickbacks, now could they?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Irrelevant - not
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The music & movie thieves don't want to be caught
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tme to form hte internet users party
BEEP BEEP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Classified
If he says it is classified, then it is so.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
More Of The Same
[ link to this | view in thread ]
* It would require world governments to mandate Human DRM in a person's brain, preventing him/her from thinking up their own ideas that would be copyright infringement. (Rev. 13:16-18)
* It would impose liability on phone companies, for dealing with people who's been talking over the phone that Yes, Hollywood may finally be able to force Phone Companies to act as their Phone Police -- something they haven't thought of in a long time.
* Along those lines, there would be "legal incentives" for phone companies, businesses, to go above and beyond that in helping governments and Hollywood.
* World Governments would be required to put wireless surveillance cameras in every home and monitor their actions to make sure they obey Hollywood or be blacklisted from society if anything that citizen do is copyright. Everything we do in our everyday lives is illegal under the TPP.
* A requirement for the UN to ban human rights in favor of protecting copyrights. Allowing Hollywood and corporate businesses to let governments ban human rights certainly help prevent people from criticizing their products.
This is why I came, to get you all away from your corporate material necessities and into Jesus Christ and His Kingdom where corporate necessities do not exist. The end is near.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Crony capitalism?!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big Government
"The government that governs least, governs best."
Isn't that what we're told?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I wonder if he would weep openly upon seeing the country he helped form repeat almost the same oppressions he spent 30-some years fighting against.
These days you always here comparisons to Nazi-this or Nazi-that, but for anyone who wants a much better picture of the economic and political climate in modern America they just need a good book of colonial America between 1750-1775.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My concern is the secret law aspect.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ultimately
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wt t
[ link to this | view in thread ]