NYTimes Threatens NYTClean Bookmarklet Maker With Bogus Trademark Claim
from the uh,-that's-not-how-trademark-works dept
We've already mentioned NYTClean, the four-line javascript bookmarklet that lets you remove the NY Times' paywall with a single click. Apparently, the NYTimes' lawyers, with their interesting interpretation of trademark law, have threatened the creator of those four lines of code, and bullied him into changing the name to NYNewspaperClean. The NYT claims that it's not complaining about the functionality, but just the name:I am writing concerning your “NYTClean” bookmarklet, posted at http://euri.ca/2011/03/21/get-around-new-york-times-20-article-limit/.This is trademark abuse. There is no confusion here. No one using the NYTClean bookmarklet thinks that it's endorsed by the NY Times. No moron in a hurry is going to be confused into believing it's a product of the NY Times. The trademark that the company has on the NY Times does not give the company total control over NYT. It only allows them to stop situations where there is clear confusion or dilution, neither of which are likely here. This is just a form of trademark bullying.
As you obviously know, The New York Times Company has used its ‘The New York Times’ trademark since at least as early as 1851 and today offers numerous products and services under its famous ‘The New York Times’ trademark, including its online version of The New York Times at the URL NYTimes.com, and various blogs and electronic media products. NYTCo’s NYTimes.com website receives over 15,000,000 unique visitors each month. NYTCo owns numerous registrations for its ‘The New York Times’ trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and Canadian Trade-Marks Office and these trademarks are among the company’s most valuable assets.
We object to your use of our famous "NYT" trademark in connection with your application and your promotion thereof, which constitutes trademark dilution and trademark infringement under U.S. and Canadian trademark law.
Accordingly, we ask that you immediately cease use of the "NYT" trademark in connection with this application. This email is without prejudice to any action that may be necessary to protect the valuable rights of NYTCo in its intellectual property.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: nytclean, paywall, trademark
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Easy fix:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not totally sure it's clear cut.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NYT Already
I NYT noticed that you NYT kept using NYT in your NYT post.
How many NYT times do you NYT think you can use NYT on your site before NYT sends you an NYT cease and NYT desist, NYT trademark dilution NYT nastygram?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disagree....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Disagree....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://twitter.com/timeswiretap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moron in a Hurry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems I was not mistaken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Billable Hours
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slightly inaccurate
The bookmarklet is just four lines of JavaScript. However, all it does is create a link to a script called "nyt.js" on euri.ca. That script is actually about 30 lines long.
But there's no question he wrote it on his lunch break. I took a look at the code, and it's really basic, script-kiddie stuff. There must be dozens of ways to get around the paywall.
By the way, you missed the best part of the article:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]