Is The FBI Lying To Congress About Its Abuses Of The Patriot Act?

from the certainly-sounds-like-it dept

Tue, Apr 5th 2011 5:33am — Mike Masnick

As we go through this brief extension in three of the more controversial provisions of the Patriot Act, which give law enforcement tremendous leeway in spying on people with very little oversight, there have been some hearings about those provisions. At a recent Senate Judiciary Hearing about this, FBI director Robert Mueller was asked if any of the three provisions had been found to be abused. Mueller responded, "I'm not aware of any." However, as the EFF notes, it has clear evidence of the roving wiretap being abused, which it found via some FOIA documents. Tellingly, when it requested info about Patriot Act violations, it received heavily redacted info. However, via a different FOIA request, it received other information that, when combined with the first FOIA request, reveals a clear abuse by the FBI. Separately, the EFF points out that (former) Senator Russ Feingold indicated at a hearing in 2009 that he had seen confidential evidence of abuse:

"I recall during the debate in 2005 that proponents of Section 215 argued that these authorities had never been misused. They cannot make that statement now. They have been misused. I cannot elaborate here. But I recommend that my colleagues seek more information in a classified setting."

On top of that, they point to a 2007 report (pdf) from the Office of the Inspector General at the Justice Dept, which notes two cases of the FBI abusing those 215 orders.

This raises some pretty serious questions. Is Director Mueller simply uninformed about his agency abusing these provisions? Or was he lying to Congress about those abuses? Neither case looks good, and neither suggests that we should renew those provisions.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fbi, patriot act, privacy

24 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Gyffes, 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:01am

er...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bosconet (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:04am

More upseting
....than everything you pointed out is that even if Director Mueller 'misspoke' or wasn't 'fully informed' there will be no consequences for him or the FBI. The 3 provisions will be rubber stamped for renewal by congress and signed into law by the President.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gyffes, 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:04am

er...
(bloody comment system...)

I'm fairly certain the only answer to your headline is:

CHUH.

They've been caught lying and cheating on their Patriot record continually -- what's likely to be different now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:17am

If he was uninformed he is incompetent, but if he is lying then he is corrupt, either way he should not be in a management position.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ComputerAddict (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:19am
  
  Re:
  But in today's fast paced world lying and being corrupt are prerequisites for a management position.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Devil's Coachman (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:26am
  
  Re:
  It's called "Plausible Deniability".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:35am
    
    Re: Re:
    the problem is with the "Plausible" part of that.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:46am
    
    Re: Re:
    You use LLC's for that.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2011 @ 10:42am
  
  Re:
  Incompetence is a requirement for high-ranking government positions.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:44am

Are they lying??
Only if their lips are moving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:44am
  
  Re: Are they lying??
  Not necessarily. If they're typing on a computer, they can be lying without moving their lips.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - The eejit (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 8:18am
    
    Re: Re: Are they lying??
    No, most politician use Skype to pirate the conversation. Using Skype to lie will become a Federal offence with the Death penalty as a minimum punishment for being caught using Skype.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ron Rezendes (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 10:17am
    
    Re: Re: Are they lying??
    Trust me, these guys are moving their mouths while they type...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
a-dub (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:48am

For once I would like to see someone man up and take responsibility. Even IF he did not know about it or take any part in it, if it happened under his watch...he needs to admit to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 5 Apr 2011 @ 6:51am

Looks like they no longer need to pull an Ollie North. "I don't recall Senator".

I suppose the Senators present didn't want to push Mueller too far because they're worried he may release recordings he has of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DS, 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:07am

Of course not. Obama fixed all that, remember? You do, don't you? Hope, change, and all of that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ron Rezendes (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 10:19am
  
  Re:
  As in...I had HOPE and now all of that has CHANGEd!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jimr (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:45am

Is this a trick question?
Is this a trick question?

Or is it just a matter of perception or interpretation of the terminology?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Planespotter (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 7:49am

I think we should gie Mueller the benefit of the doubt, maybe he doesn't know what a photocopier is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ella, 5 Apr 2011 @ 3:53pm

abuses
What they are doing is using the Patriot Act to protect the Satanic power structure. If anyone goes against them, meaning saying they are a victim of Masonic Ritual Abuse, a victim of CIA MK ULTRA mind control and torture with Tesla electromagnetic weapons, a victim of abuse by a priest, then they are targeted.
The formula is the SAME for ALL of us. It is the Targeted Individual story. We are first hacked, slandered, then gangstalked and harassed, our houses are entered on a daily basis, we are harassed by low flying helicopters and airplanes, our phones are tapped, we are falsely diagnosed with delusional disorder, or worse, paranoid schizophrenia, forced to take medication, in many cases. They sometimes take our children, they kill people around us, they vandalize our vehicles, and many are tortured with voice to skull technology. This is why the Patriot Act was implemented in the first place. There are no terrorists. Freemasons are the terrorists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tom Landry (profile), 5 Apr 2011 @ 5:16pm

Cops despise anything that takes away a potential tool that gives them an excuse to ignore what would otherwise be constitutional rights. Whether its needle exchange programs, medical marijuana, raising of speed limits, the ability to spy on folks without the need for warrants etc. I can certainly understand their reasoning since it gives them less options in their toolkit to fight crime. Unfortunately they lose perspective on why they do what they do and it fosters an "us-against-them, if-you've-nothing-to-hide-you-shouldn't-worry" mindset.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John McCabe, 16 Apr 2011 @ 5:35am

Patriot Act Abuse
Most of the comments offered certainly indicate a problem with the process. However, I think that there is nothing you can do about it. What is, will be!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
theresa, 30 Nov 2011 @ 11:02am

fbi lies
They hide under the patriot act to miss use power over people to soon gain all controll over peoples comeing and goings abuse of power is the reason of this act not aecurity ovet american people but survaliance over american people no freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jennifer Durand, 19 Apr 2016 @ 12:25am

Drones , thermal imaging, 24 /7 survielkance
I have been the victim of this pervasive surviellance 24 hrs a day seven days a week for years. They use thermal cameras over my home too. If it is quiet I can hear them hovering and when I go towards my door I can hear them move. They can intercept Internet data on a home wifi network , censor it real time, they started that about 4 years ago. The only reason I know that is because they were mocking me . This year they are skywriting with whatever drones or aircraft they are using to spy. This is a tyranny reminiscent of Orwell and Cointelpro on steroids. I am going to sue them but what are you're actual chances of redress when they blatantly lie to lawmakers and the judicial system. Parallel reconstructions telling police to lie in court. Stop look around people we are loosing the freedom that America stands for and I am personally afraid of my government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]