Alzheimer's Research Disrupted By Ridiculous Patent Dispute
from the wonderful dept
We keep hearing stories of important healthcare research being disrupted by patents, and the latest, as pointed out by Slashdot, involves an organization called the Alzheimer's Institute of America... which happened to buy some patents on a DNA sequence, and is now suing or threatening to sue a ton of researchers in the space. Amusingly, AIA presents itself as an organization committed to supporting Alzheimer's research, when it appears the organization is more focused on shaking down researchers.The key lawsuit at issue is the one filed against the Jackson Laboratory, which provides special lab mice for Alzheimer's research and is funded by the NIH. But AIA is pissed off that it's not getting a cut:
The AIA is alleging that Jackson infringed on its Swedish mutation patent, and others, when the lab distributed 22 strains of mice with the mutation to researchers; the organization is seeking unspecified damages.AIA has tried to defend its actions by saying that it's okay to use the mouse models for academic research, but you can't make money from it. The Jackson Laboratory points out that it's not making money from the models, and that it only got some money for the models which doesn't even cover the costs associated with the models.
The lawsuit also accuses six commercial companies of improperly profiting from the Swedish mutation, for instance by using mice bearing the mutation to test potential drugs. Furthermore, the AIA has filed four separate suits relating to the patent against academic institutions and companies in Oklahoma, Florida, Missouri and Pennsylvania (see 'Patent disputes').
But the litigation against Jackson could have the broadest impact on research. According to Einhorn, the AIA is demanding that Jackson hands over the names of all scientists who have worked with the relevant mouse models; this raises the possibility that those individual researchers might also be sued.
But the key issue is that as a lab that relies on philanthropy and grants to operate, the last thing it can afford is a costly patent battle. Instead, it's asked the NIH to fight on its behalf. The lab could just settle, but the AIA is demanding that a settlement would involve Jackson handing over researchers' names who received the models, and Jackson finds that handing out such information would be "repugnant."
There are all sorts of reasons why researchers are doing this kind of work on Alzheimer's. Patents have very little to do with it. Many people would genuinely like to find ways to prevent, delay or (one can hope) cure the disease. But it appears that patents are seriously interfering with that mission. That these efforts to block research are coming from an organization that purports to support Alzheimer's research is nothing short of sickening.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alzheimers, patents
Companies: alzheimers institute of america, jackson laboratory
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Patent trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patent trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Im not surprised when nuclear scientists get radiation poisoning, so why be surprised when Alzheimers researchers forget why they started in the first place.
ty, ty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dark ages
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dark ages
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their web page (doesn't) say it all
"Please Excuse Us
We at the AIA are working to update our website and anticipate having the information you've requested avalaible online soon. Please check back later."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Damn Thieves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yet another smugly presented, gross oversimplification of a for-profit company doing what for-profit companies do in the current climate of IP law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Question.
-C
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Question.
Maybe technology will enable people to work around those laws by allowing people to telecommute to another lab in another country where laws are not this absurd.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.tuvie.com/kitchen-nano-garden-serves-excellent-way-to-grow-your-own-vegetables/
Those rodents doesn't seem to difficult to replicate, after all they are mouses and they procreate like rabbits
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NO AC's...yet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
its a slow, horribly undignified way to die and it will tear out your heart on a daily basis. Anyone holding up research because of a patent dispute should be made to work in an Alzheimer's ward for a month.
People wonder why I despise Attorneys as much as I do. Tell me how this kind of legal BS helps anyone other than these parasitic pieces of shit and a few greedy clients.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(disclaimer: I'm not an anonymous IP maximalist troll, but I can play one in threads devoid of actual trolls)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typical of labs and pharma companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apologies, I'm upset.
Who's got the fucking patent on this weapon of mass destruction? Who's turning a buck on making my husband cry?
I was wondering the other day if the nuclear disaster in Japan and its unthinkable effects would suddenly pry a cure for cancer out of a forgotten desk drawer somewhere...or if these monsters will just patent - and sue and hinder and complicate - new bullshit that only treats symptoms, that compliments the not so modern method of butchery that currently exists as the only real solution...
Mice. Fucking mice they'll kill people over.
These are the foxes running the henhouse...no, that's insulting to animals who merely behave out of need...
These are human monsters committing crimes against humanity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apologies, I'm upset.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]