UFC Claims Copyright On Video Of The Crowd At Its Events?
from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept
Rob points us to news about a fight that broke out in the audience at a UFC event in Toronto recently. Of course, we couldn't care less about the fight itself, but what's interesting is that the video of the fight in the audience has been taken down, due to a copyright claim from UFC:Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seems bogus, unless they have some ridiculously broad language on the back of tickets saying purchasers assign all rights in photos/videos taken at the event.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And unless the person who had filmed the crowd was under an employee relationship (again highly unlikely) only THEY have ability to decide who can breach THEIR copyright.
Also if UFC try to state that it was THEIR crowd even that has no standing since it was full of humans, is absolutely not a static medium and can in no way be held as a copyrightable medium owned by a corporation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This could possibly make it easier to open UFC to liability for any injuries caused at the event. The reason for this is because they treat the fight in the crowd just like they would if it was a sanctioned UFC fight but did not have signed wavers for the two crowd fighters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The cameramen at the UFC event don't necessarily have to be employees for UFC to have a claim. I'd be shocked if they didn't have an agreement assigning whatever rights they may have to UFC.
As for a copyrightable medium, it's not the humans that's the medium; it's the videotape (or hard drive, or whatever they're recording on).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Of course, your license doesn't actually have to be enforceable to provide a plausible basis for a DMCA takedown claim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fight at UFC 91
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who you calling "we," Mike?
Like "Zowitzki v. Nelson" during the Hagler-Hearns rematch, in which Nelson suckerpunched Zowitzki for "eyeballing" his girlfriend. Ralph "The Mouth" Zowitzki responded with something unprintable (mainly because it was unintelligible) before wrapping up Nelson in a very-ironic full nelson and pinning him to the very sticky floor.
At this point someone threw up, but various reports fail to say who. Possibly Nelson's girlfriend, who was on her 5th and 7th Quaalude. Witnesses reported last seeing her "listing badly to starboard" before sinking entirely out of sight somewhere between the 3rd and 5th rows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps It's a Contract Issue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://74.6.117.48/search/srpcache?ei=UTF-8&p=ufc+129+and+crowd+brawl+caught+on+tape& fr=yfp-t-701&u=http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=ufc+129+and+crowd+brawl+caught+on+tape&d=270 25322033547690&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=cf6da850,8eb7e92c&icp=1&.intl=us&si g=tZ01frkwv0iB9A1mhWHSLQ--
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just sticking some text on the back of something i hand you does not suddenly create a legal contract, else i could just as easily claim that "by reading, posting or otherwise attending a thread here on techdirt, hearafter known as "techdirt", you are required to send 10% of your weekly earnings to me"
Venue owners and event creators just stick that stuff on there to cow you into following it. I have seen the same thing with security guards at galleries claiming "you have to delete that image from your camera or you will be arrested"
this is not to say that you could not be Ejected from an event for failing to listen to a guard/etc, but that is a different matter altogether
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]