Dispute Over Nude Nuns Copyright Leads To Second Firm Copying First Firm's Lawsuit

from the copyright-gone-mad dept

Wed, May 11th 2011 1:32pm — Mike Masnick

We recently wrote about the lawsuit that was filed against 5,865 alleged downloaders of the B-movie Nude Nuns With Big Guns by Camelot Distribution Group. In many ways, the lawsuit seemed like many of the other mass infringer shakedown lawsuits... but there was one element that made it interesting. A second company, Incentive Capital, said that Camelot didn't hold the copyright in question. Basically, Camelot had borrowed money from Incentive in order to purchase the copyright to the movie in question, but failed to payback the loan and Incentive had foreclosed on the film.

Camelot continued to push forward with the lawsuit and, in an amusing twist, Incentive Capital has filed an almost identical lawsuit against the exact same 5,865 alleged downloaders:

I wonder if Camelot would file a copyright infringement lawsuit against Incentive for copying its lawsuit (though, (1) I doubt that Camelot registered its lawsuit and (2) there would be reasonable claims that much of the copied parts were not subject to copyright). Still, the whole thing is kind of amusing (assuming you're not one of the 5,865 being sued twice).

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, lawsuits
Companies: camelot distribution group, incentive capital

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

weneedhelp (profile), 11 May 2011 @ 2:00pm

note to self
Google at home: Nude Nuns With Big Guns. Done.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 May 2011 @ 2:11pm

Im too forgetful for all that, so I just googled it from work. Oopths
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Snidely, 11 May 2011 @ 2:20pm

It's the little things
At least they changed the font. That should probably avoid the lawsuit for lawsuit copyright infringement.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 May 2011 @ 2:22pm

Re: It's the little things
All lawsuits should be filed in comic sans, the best font ever invented.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TheStupidOne, 11 May 2011 @ 2:25pm

Re: Re: It's the little things
no, wingdings ... It would be easier to read than most of the legal drivel I've seen
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 May 2011 @ 2:47pm

So how does double jeopardy apply to copyright infringement?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Joseph K (profile), 11 May 2011 @ 3:54pm

God praise thee copyright
It's good that we have copyright to protect such embattled forms of artistic expression as b-grade. nunspoitation revenge movies. This heaven-sanctified genre is barely surviving, due to the demonic threat of pirates, almost impelling a person to take action in the way of the films noble protagonist and dress up as a nun and hunt down all of those 5,865 infringers one by one.

See the trailer here

(Poe's Law disclaimer: the above is not meant to be taken seriously)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), 11 May 2011 @ 4:45pm

I just got here...
Tied up at work and all that. Is it too late to stake a claim as the "exclusive United States distributor of the motion picture titled Nuns with Guns"?

I'm more than willing to get in on one of the few movies to make nearly all of its money in the courtroom rather than the theater. I can even provide various nuns and/or guns should they be needed for evidence. At least, I assume I can. If I get a school bus and some guns, the rest should all go off without a hitch.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
abc gum, 11 May 2011 @ 5:31pm

Re:
So how does double jeopardy apply to extortion?

FTFY
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward, 11 May 2011 @ 7:31pm

no no no its not all a money grab... nothing to see here...
*boggle*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
G Thompson (profile), 11 May 2011 @ 9:28pm

Re: Re: Re: It's the little things
Or just send the text to

http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html

Hilarity ensues!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jonathan, 11 May 2011 @ 11:11pm

Actually, in Israel there were several suits regarding copyright in legal documents
Well,

Under Israeli law, there were four prominent cases involved lawyers copying from other lawyers their suits. In three cases the courts ruled that the defendants violated copyright (Calderon v. Alon, Azgad v. Shpiglman and Goldhammer v. Segal) and rejected in once (Soroker-Agmon v. Artman).

The case of Artman was different as the court acknowledged that there are certain legal documents that lack originality. It was quite interesting to find out, and might be of interest here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]