Dispute Over Nude Nuns Copyright Leads To Second Firm Copying First Firm's Lawsuit
from the copyright-gone-mad dept
We recently wrote about the lawsuit that was filed against 5,865 alleged downloaders of the B-movie Nude Nuns With Big Guns by Camelot Distribution Group. In many ways, the lawsuit seemed like many of the other mass infringer shakedown lawsuits... but there was one element that made it interesting. A second company, Incentive Capital, said that Camelot didn't hold the copyright in question. Basically, Camelot had borrowed money from Incentive in order to purchase the copyright to the movie in question, but failed to payback the loan and Incentive had foreclosed on the film.Camelot continued to push forward with the lawsuit and, in an amusing twist, Incentive Capital has filed an almost identical lawsuit against the exact same 5,865 alleged downloaders:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, lawsuits
Companies: camelot distribution group, incentive capital
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
note to self
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's the little things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's the little things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's the little things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's the little things
http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html
Hilarity ensues!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
God praise thee copyright
See the trailer here
(Poe's Law disclaimer: the above is not meant to be taken seriously)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just got here...
I'm more than willing to get in on one of the few movies to make nearly all of its money in the courtroom rather than the theater. I can even provide various nuns and/or guns should they be needed for evidence. At least, I assume I can. If I get a school bus and some guns, the rest should all go off without a hitch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*boggle*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, in Israel there were several suits regarding copyright in legal documents
Under Israeli law, there were four prominent cases involved lawyers copying from other lawyers their suits. In three cases the courts ruled that the defendants violated copyright (Calderon v. Alon, Azgad v. Shpiglman and Goldhammer v. Segal) and rejected in once (Soroker-Agmon v. Artman).
The case of Artman was different as the court acknowledged that there are certain legal documents that lack originality. It was quite interesting to find out, and might be of interest here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]