Al Franken Grandstands Over Meaningless Privacy Policies
from the come-on-al dept
We were just discussing the whole misguided focus on privacy policies. For years, now, there's been this false and silly belief that, if we just required that websites have "privacy policies," it would somehow lead to more privacy. But it's a completely false sense of security. No one reads privacy policies. They're meaningless. And you can put anything in one -- including claiming to freely give up anyone's data to anyone who asks. And yet... the obsession continues. My original post on the subject was due to a silly study about how many mobile apps don't have privacy policies. In true grandstanding fashion, it appears Senator Al Franken has picked up on that report, and is saying that Apple and Google should require privacy policies.I'm sure he means well, and I'm sure he thinks this is about protecting people's privacy. But it's not. What good does a privacy policy do in this situation? It presents a bunch of policies that no one will read, no one will pay attention to, which the company can change at any time, and which can be written so broadly as to be the opposite of actually protecting anyone's privacy. And yet, if Google and Apple require such things, Franken and others will think they're protecting people's privacy, when they're not. Stop worrying about privacy policies, and start focusing on stuff that actually matters.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: al franken, mobile, privacy, privacy policies
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If franken can require Apple and Google to require privacy policies he gets to point to something he's "done" even though it's changed nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpbpzif7jGk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isn't it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isn't it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Turned to the Political Dark Side He Has
Franken was seduced by the Dark Side of Politics. He ceased to be Al Franken and "became" Senator Franken. When that happened, the good man who was Al was destroyed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Industry self-regulation
In general industry self-regulation of this sort only works when most of the industry is made up of large players who are capable of enforcing meaningful standards amongst themselves - in essence, because enforcement shifts from police/regulators to the industry itself, there must be some sufficiently powerful authority to do the enforcement.
Google and Apple have the capability to force developers to make a disclosure about how the info is used, but as a practical matter the decentralization of App development means they can't enforce meaningful privacy standards without scaling up the review process (which could be costly). You can investigate and monitor a few developers for relatively low cost, but not thousands. So app developers can easily release ridiculous policies or even fail to adhere to their own policies with low risk of punishment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just leave him alone!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why isn't there a EULA protocol?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Say it ain't so
Next you'll tell me that folks in Minnesota vote for clowns just because they're famous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some do read privacy policies
Another reason to require privacy policies is that could potentially be used as a basis for a class action lawsuit, which can happen even if literally no one in the class read the policy. Without a policy, there can be no breach of policy and therefore no actionable claim.
Yet another reason is that it's conceivable that some smart kid might come up with an app that checks privacy policies and alerts the user of potential danger prior to download. That can't happen unless the privacy policies exist.
It's true that one-person app operations have little incentive to adhere to their policies, but the bigger players do and this proposal does help (in a small way) to keep them honest.
I know that it's easier to make generalities about politicians or ad hominem on Franken, but it doesn't bolster anyone's position to completely ignore arguments in favor of this proposal. I'd love to hear about the stuff "that actually matters."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]