Censoring Begins At Home: Iran Announces Plans To Build Its Own Internet, Operating System

from the Anonymous-says-O-RLY? dept

Mon, Jun 6th 2011 2:44am — Tim Cushing

Iran's government has decided to push past regular villainy and head straight for cartoonish super-villainy with its plan to build its own internet. Being one of the "most sophisticated nations in online censoring" just isn't enough these days, what with every "civilized" nation pushing its own brand of censorship. It looks as if Iran has decided that if the internet is too difficult to regulate, it may be easier to start from the ground floor.

Iran is promoting its national internet as a "cost-saving measure for consumers and a way to uphold Islamic moral codes." This will operate in parallel with the existing internet before making the switch to IOL or whatever this new censornet will be called. The roll-out is going quickly, with 60% of Iran's homes and businesses migrating "soon," with the entire country due to be completely severed from the rest of the world "within two years."

The Iranian government is also looking to install a new basement (if we follow the "new internet = "ground floor" analogy -- and I guess we will). It intends to roll out its own operating system to replace Windows within the coming months. Ali Aghamohammadi, the Iranian Head of Economic Affairs, has expressed his confidence that the government-approved internet and operating system will also be deployed by other Muslim countries.

This bit of dismaying news had no sooner graced the pages of the un-Iranian internet when information surfaced that Anonymous had hacked the Iranian government's computers. The "group" succeeded in harvesting 10,000 email messages from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs containing "approvals and rejections for a variety of visas and passports, among other requests, and correspondence."

In addition, Anonymous is planning a day-long DDoS attack to commemorate the anniversary of the 2009 elections, which saw Ahmadinejad doing everything from shutting down Facebook access to ordering the torching of an opponent's campaign office.

Whether these actions will hasten or delay the implementation of the Iran-only internet remains to be seen. Iran has only stated that it will be rolled out "soon," wording, which is vague enough that either side can claim it acheived its goals. As more anti-government activity flares up in nearby regions, usually accompanied by a shutdown of communication services, it would surprise exactly no one if other like-minded countries begin to view Iran as their ISP of choice.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, hacking, internet, iran, operating system

42 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

BearGriz72 (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 2:05am

Wow...
...just wow
/facepalm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yogi, 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:00am

Bored?
Does this mean that they've become bored with stoning women and homosexuals and that they are now moving on to more advanced forms of entertainment?

Probably they'll just use their private Iranternet to upload videos of the Muslim faithful stoning women and homosexuals to IranTube.

Whatever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Poster, 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:01am

You know, if Iran wants to return to the Dark Ages and stay there, I say we let them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 7 Jun 2011 @ 6:59am
  
  Re:
  "You know, if Iran wants to return to the Dark Ages and stay there, I say we let them."
  
  Its more about monitoring what people do online, and controlling communications. Which is great for the US, 1 day, 1 packet sniffer, and total control over the Iraninan internet.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Robert, 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:06am

I see Iran is the first country to heed the call of Sarkozy to creat a "civilized" internet. Sadly, this proved to be incompatible with the French civilized internet and they had to go and create their own.

Well, it's a small price for a proper internet that works as it should, not being able to discuss or speak about the misdeeds of the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:13am

You know, the way things are heading, we'll probably start seeing more countries heading down this road. And not just in third-world I-hate-freedom countries, but also in some "developed" countries too.

Warrant-less domain takedowns are just the beginning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:19am

Before the Internet
You know, before the Internet as we know existed, there were several separate national networks. So they building a separate national network is not exactly a new idea.

And the Internet was originally designed as a way to bridge several disparate networks (thus the name Internet). That it ended up replacing them is a tribute to how well it works.

So, if Iran creates a new national network, it will end up being interconnected to the Internet via gateways, exactly like happened in the past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Planespotter (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:07am
  
  Re: Before the Internet
  I wonder who has the patent on "county/area based internet"?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - LegitTroll (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 8:05am
    
    Re: Re: Before the Internet
    At&t of course.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nom du Clavier (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:23am

Not the Prince of Persia I'd hoped for, this Ahmedinejad
At one time they used to have the start of the art in science there. It looks like they've given the orders to restore that state of the art, and someone misunderstood this to mean heading back to the age where windmills were considered novel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nom du Clavier (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:25am
  
  Re: Not the Prince of Persia I'd hoped for, this Ahmedinejad
  state of the art, at that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Andrew (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:37am

Ali Aghamohammadi, the Iranian Head of Economic Affairs, has expressed his confidence that the government-approved internet and operating system will also be deployed by other Muslim countries.

Yeah, because every other country in the Middle East trusts Iran implicitly.

While this appears to be more of a rebranding exercise than anything (it's apparently based on Linux), it's probably a good time, in advance of the inevitable hack attacks that will follow, to remember Schneier's Law

Any person can invent a security system so clever that he or she can't imagine a way of breaking it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike allen (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 3:41am

How many more countries I await David Cameron announcing GB net next. Followed by Obama with the US net ohh that's what we all use .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Known Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:05am

Re Censorship Begins at Home
A Very Large nation in Asia are past masters at censoring the net without inventing a new one. Maybe that's why nothing has been leaked to Selective Leaks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:14am

4 year-old in close proximity to water declares sovereignty after building sand castle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
herbert, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:31am

i think this sort of thing was inevitable, given the restrictions that the entertainment industries and various governments are implementing, along with shutdowns of domains and so-called 'infringing' web sites. trouble is, it allows for greater restrictions to be put into place as well. doubt if it will be long before there are individual 'country nets and O/Ss' springing up all over the place. all because certain industries and certain countries have been and still are trying to censor the internet, whilst condemning countries that already do that. it has been said many times that once the Internet becomes controlled, it will be broken. not far away now, then everyone will suffer!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 5:07am
  
  Re:
  I agree to some extent - but I think you underestimate the ability of the techies to route around this nonsense.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:32am

Now everyone is going to want their own internet
... what happens to your own personal Internet? I just the other day got ... an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday. I got it yesterday (Tuesday). Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- aldestrawk (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 9:45am
  
  Re: Now everyone is going to want their own internet
  LOL, tubular!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Di Fiasco (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:47am

lol - I can see it now:

"...iAllah Search Results for 'Women's Parental Rights'

Result 1: Infidel! You should not look at such things!
Result 2: Infidel! You should not look at such things!
Result 2: Infidel! You should not look at such things!

Search Suspended. Your activities have been logged. Please remain stationary while a consultant is arranged to visit with you..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:36pm
  
  Re:
  LOL!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Harry, 6 Jun 2011 @ 4:58am

Finally a TECH story
I was beginning to think this website changed its name to copyright and trademarkdirt.com Im just happy to actually see a tech article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rikuo (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 5:06am
  
  Re: Finally a TECH story
  what's so wrong with the copyright and trademark stories? They affect technology in various ways so are perfect for a site called techdirt to report on.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 6:17am
    
    Re: Re: Finally a TECH story
    Actually, the trademark and copyright articles are the "dirt" part of techdirt.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The eejit (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 9:25am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Finally a TECH story
      Irony personified.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 7:20am
  
  Re: Finally a TECH story
  This article is consistent with the censorship imposed by bogus copyright and trademark misuse.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Del Boy, 6 Jun 2011 @ 5:11am

Internet
When censorship bites chunks out of the internet it ceases to be the internet & becomes a restrictive intranet. What next censored local area networks. As the internet got larger the world got smaller ... now it seems the internet is on a return journey, big assed world again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Viln (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 5:37am

I have faith that Iran will actually try to go through with this. Of course, whatever IOS' and hardware they choose to use will be either be duplicates or knock-offs of existing products. Not only will this potentially insulate their economy, it will make their gateways the new favorite target of people who have already thoroughly hacked the second-generation gear they'll be using. Of course, taking away the internet might just be enough to turn peaceful protests into an armed insurrection.

I highly doubt any of the surrounding nations in that region will be using Iran as an ISP any time soon, even the terrifyingly ignorant ones. But if they're successful in securing Iranternet and keeping the unwanted out and hiding their dirty laundry, Sony might be throwing a few security contracts their way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 11:40am
  
  Re:
  Iran will be the training grounds for hackers worldwide. Sounds like a lush playground at that...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
pbarker (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 5:57am

BSoD
This will give a whole new meaning to the BSoD, or "Blue Screen of Death"....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pbarker (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 6:06am

Al Gore
Also -
Isn't Al Gore gonna be pissed?
Al did invent the whole interweb thingy in the first place...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco

On second thought - he might like having his name on all of it:

Al-Browser
Al-Office
Al-OS

;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 6:19am

You know...
This may not be such a bad idea in theory. Let's have an Islamic internet, a Christian internet, a legacy business internet, and the rest of us can have the original internet back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 6:46am
  
  Re: You know...
  Can I be on your interwebs if I promise not to mention that I'm Christian? A 'Christian Approved' site list sounds dreadfully boring.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 7:34am

Special interests will be forcing this all over the world. Thanks to the legacy companies we're going to start seeing different versions of the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ron Rezendes (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 11:05am
  
  Re:
  Then, why don't we simply create the RIAA.net now and tell the RIAA that it is the only place where you are guaranteed that you CAN'T get ANY content, not from the artists nor otherwise.
  
  Then, we tell them, EVERYONE has been forced to use the new network. They will see no music or other content being shared on their RIAA.net and the piracy problem will be solved!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 9:18am

Hilarious and inevitable
I think this is both hilarious and inevitable. As all countries have unique laws, so should all regional Internet. This is not some fantasy New World Order where all abide by the same legal code. Iran will do what suits Iran. Same as all other countries. Each will carve out its own space online, and they will mostly be distinct.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 9:27am
  
  Re: Hilarious and inevitable
  And what happens when they intersect? Do they just go into an endless handshaking until one gives up? OR so they send the IP around to 'confiscate' your illegal use of tech, then guillotine you on the A-Train that is Old Sparky.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
tuscolablue (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 9:54am

Cool
Here with Microsoft, we get the blue screen of death. With Iran's new OS, you just get death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 6 Jun 2011 @ 10:52am

Iran will probably also have their own version of a three-strikes law;

http://theamericano.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/An-Iranian-woman-at-a-pro-006.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
aldestrawk (profile), 6 Jun 2011 @ 2:17pm

Hey Iran, hire me!
Iran, hire me as a consultant and I will give you the full details of how to have this up and running quickly. Here's the overview on my proposal: Use Novell's IPX protocol stack instead of TCP/IP. Any patents have probably expired by now and although core routers still handle and route IPX packets, most hosts do not handle this stack anymore. Additionally, we can change a couple of key fields in the headers to make it incompatible with the existing IPX protocol stack in such a way that makes it a huge pain in the ass to do protocol conversion. You would have to know these IPX packets were coming from Iran to handle conversion to regular IPX or the TCP/IP stack. Large scale gateways would be impossible without Iran's cooperation and this scheme would make small scale gateways much more difficult.
As your consultant I would have to point out a couple of caveats. You will never be able to drop the parallel network plan. A TCP/IP network connected to the rest of the world will always be needed for business, scientific research, and for your government to keep tabs on world news, foreign governments, and ex-pat dissidents. Finally, I must advise you that separating your network from the internet may spark a backlash among the general populace which will end up countering the effect you desire. You cannot erase the knowledge of the existence of the internet. Although your government clearly understands the dangers of unfiltered information to it's people and itself, you cannot suppress the inherent curiosity that exists in all cultures.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
aikiwolfie (profile), 7 Jun 2011 @ 7:50am

"The Iranian government is also looking to install a new basement (if we follow the "new internet = "ground floor" analogy -- and I guess we will). It intends to roll out its own operating system to replace Windows within the coming months. Ali Aghamohammadi, the Iranian Head of Economic Affairs, has expressed his confidence that the government-approved internet and operating system will also be deployed by other Muslim countries."

Personally I'm amazed no one has done this before. If it succeeds it won't just be Muslim countries following suit. China will be close behind, followed swiftly by France. Except France will ban all non-Microsoft OSs or invent a special tax for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mohammed Najdi, 20 May 2012 @ 9:14am

God bless iran
I really wonder how a country that most of the world are against it and fighting it is still capable to evolve and become stronger and stronger!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]