How Much Does It Cost Taxpayers To Implement Three Strikes?

from the this-seems-important dept

Mon, Jun 20th 2011 8:22am — Mike Masnick

With the recent UN report condemning three strikes laws that kick people off the internet based on accusations (not convictions) of copyright infringement as a civil rights violation, there's been a lot more attention paid to the reasonableness of such laws. Of course, there are other factors to take into account as well, including the general cost to the taxpayer. Over in the UK, James Firth filed some Freedom of Information requests with the UK government to try to understand how much such things are really costing. He got an answer from Ofcom, the telecom/ISP regulator, who noted that it's expected to have spent about £5.9 million (or just under $10 million) by the end of this year on implementing the digital copyright enforcement measures in the Digital Economy Act (which are mostly about a three strikes plan). Firth notes that this is just one part of the government's costs, and he has other FOI requests out for other parts. He also notes, per Ofcom, that the agency hopes to get this money back from fees from copyright holders making use of the process, but that's not guaranteed. Definitely an interesting bit of information to explore, which usually gets ignored in these discussions.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: costs, ofcom, three strikes, uk

19 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

E. Zachary Knight (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 8:33am

Here is another question
Instead of asking how much it costs the tax payers, I would like to pose the following question:

How much is this legislation likely to cost the overall economy?

This means, how many services will have to shutter their websites in order to prevent people from falling victim to this legislation? How many people will move out of the country to bypass these laws and take their skills elsewhere? How many people will be blocked from purchasing from online companies or earning an honest living using the internet as a result of these laws?

I want to see the governments of these nations try to quantify that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve, 20 Jun 2011 @ 8:36am

Oops...
Looks like someone forgot a semicolon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:05am
  
  Re: Oops...
  If it compiles, it is free of bugs. :-)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2011 @ 8:49am

So it costs about $10M and they expect to make that back, meaning it will probably be free but there's a chance it won't be. This isn't much of a story. I'm sure you'll have another story here soon about how stupid IP laws are and how the sky is falling because of it. Must be slow today. Don't worry, I'm sure you'll make something up. You always do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sam sin, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:12am
  
  Re:
  as you always do, then!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:36am
  
  Re:
  Orly? If there was even a possibility that you (or anyone) would not get 10 million dollars back, how flippant would you be about it?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:59am
  
  Re:
  You miss the point that this is just to the Government. Aside from the costs to the ISPs in enforcing the DEA, as well as the costs (which will be passed on to consumers eventually).
  
  That �5mil figure is just the start, and is wasteful spending that could be cut, instead of the Surestart program, which has a noticable effect on children.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 11:14am
  
  Re:
  Who's getting the money back? The taxpayers? The government? Hell no!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DEANE, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:00am

@AC

not much of a story when the UK government is wasting 10m of the taxpayers money? to me that is a serious amount.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:04am

As if we don't have enough victimless crimes already.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:08am
  
  What do you mean victimless?
  These crimes aren't victimless.
  
  Copyright shakedown extortion letters aren't victimless.
  
  Getting your internet cut off after three false accusations isn't victimless.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - anymouse (profile), 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:30am
    
    Re: What do you mean victimless?
    Copyright infringement is 'victimless' unless you count the 'potential lost sales of the recording industry'....
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Bengie, 20 Jun 2011 @ 10:29am
      
      Re: Re: What do you mean victimless?
      Don't worry, the loss of sales is usually overwhelmed by the increase of sales caused by free-advertisement.
      
      The only real non-commercial copyright infringement that hurts the industry is people actually selling copies. P2P is just advertisement.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
herbert, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:14am

if Ofcom thinks for 1 second that they will recoup any of the costs, they are in 'cloud cuckoo land'. they dont have a hope in hell!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anonymous, 20 Jun 2011 @ 12:45pm
  
  Re:
  the music industry doesn't even pay their own artists, the very people that earn them money in the first place, so no chance of Ofcom getting anything back, at least not from them. serves them bloody well right! assholes!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anonymous, 20 Jun 2011 @ 12:46pm
  
  Re:
  the music industry doesn't even pay their own artists, the very people that earn them money in the first place, so no chance of Ofcom getting anything back, at least not from them. serves them bloody well right! assholes!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:23am

You'd think they might consider the roaring success of Eircom's pilot program. I mean what is 300 letters sent to innocent people when the poor media companies business model needs more shoring up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
James Firth, 20 Jun 2011 @ 1:06pm

Recouping �6m...
Look at it another way - the music industry expects to recoup this �6m investment somehow, either by suing a significant proportion of repeat "infringers" or getting more music sales.

Since all studies to date (2 authoritative) plus anecdotal evidence (Guy sells a million eBooks at 99c - nets $350,000) show that lowering price is the key to making more money from legitimate download sales I'd say it's probably not option 2.

So they need to recoup �6m from suing repeat "offenders". But by the tone of recent judgements they're going to have a job proving the ISP account holder is liable for what's happening on their network, so essentially that's �6m down the pan.

And the government? Well they're locked in now too. If they don't implement this, it's �6m wasted that they'll never get back. At least when warning letters start landing on doormats the taxpayer is going to start seeing some returns (all but the �215,626.49 sent on non-reimbursable items).

So yes, I think it's a big deal.

@JamesFirth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mr Big Content, 20 Jun 2011 @ 9:44pm

You Cannot Put A Price On Law Enforcement
How much money is it worth to sleep easily in your beds at night? That has a value that is more than mere money. So to try to measure anti-piracy efforts in those terms is absurd.

After all, a multi-billion-dollar industry deserves some consideration, don�t you think?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]