DailyDirt: Women's Work
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
The social challenges of reducing the employment gender gap isn't exactly new, but there could be a growing number of good reasons to reduce inequalities in the workplace. The economic benefits of more female employment might boost GDP statistics (though GDP is far from a perfect measure of an economy). It's a complex issue, but here are just a few interesting data points on this subject.- The often-quoted statistic that women are "paid 77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men" isn't as accurate or as simple as that single number. There's a gap (women *are* paid less), but the whole story should account for factors such as education levels, hours worked, and occupations. [url]
- The "Opt-Out Revolution" described the phenomenon of working women choosing to drop out of the workforce in the early 2000s to raise kids and lead more enjoyable lives. Apparently, a decade later, there weren't that many fairy tale endings for that choice, and nearly 90% of those SAHMs want to get back to work (but less than half find full time employment). [url]
- Japan could potentially boost its GDP by as much as 14% by adopting "womenomics" policies that would encourage more women to enter or stay in the labor force. In Japan, about 70% of women stop working after having kids -- nearly double the figure for countries like the US or Germany. [url]
- Womenomics could work for the rest of the world, too. However, the benefits might not be as large, with estimates that countries like France and Germany could boost their GDPs by 4% if more women were in the work force. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: employment, gdp, gender gap, happiness index, sahm, womenomics
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
77%
That in itself is a problem worth fixing.
But 77 percent is still the "right" number to focus on, because the fact that women don't get the same education, work experience, jobs, and hours, are also problems worth fixing.
(I say this as a man in a male-dominated field whose wife is better-educated and better-paid than him.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 77%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 77%
If one class of people is systemically disadvantaged, saying "Is there something wrong with letting people make their own decisions and live with the consequences?" is pure intellectual dishonesty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 77%
I asked what was wrong with letting women make their own career decisions-- decisions with consequences. If that's what you call dishonesty, then you and I are simply speaking different languages.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 77%
What is wrong with encouraging multitudes into careers and then pulling the rug out from underneath them?
What is wrong with taking advantage of workers?
What is wrong with deregulation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 77%
A more interesting question may be why they chose one, or why they weren't able to achieve both. Usually "choosing family over career" means "raising a child" in this topic. So, was adaquate child care available? If it was available, how expensive was it? Was any flexibility available from employers?
Was there *really* a choice, or was there only the appearance of a choice?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 77%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 77%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 77%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 77%
Well no, it's not a "problem worth fixing". It's not even (necessarily) a problem. Not everyone wants the education, work experience, jobs and hours that get the most pay. The fact that a certain group selects certain options that result in less pay isn't a "problem". It's simply a fact. Different relative valuations of money and non-monetary values are not a problem. In fact it's a good thing. Can you imagine a society where everyone valued nice days at the beach relative to money at the same ratio? Or everyone wanted to limit their work hours to the same extent and were all equally committed to do this? It would be bizarre inefficient and dystopian in a weird, 1984ish way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is well known that a large quantity of the populace falls within the middle class, bell curve sort of fits. It is also well understood that, to a large extent, the economy is driven by middle class purchasing. When middle class jobs are lost and their replacement is minimum wage the economy suffers. Simply looking at the unemployment rates is missing a big part of the picture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It has also halved inflation-adjusted pay for workers doing the same job 30 years ago (double the labor supply -> same demand -> half the wages). Not saying women shouldn't work per se, just saying that pushing it from a top-down approach doesn't necessary increase a family's earnings as a whole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wage gap
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0882775.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]