Czech Pirate Party Tries To Show That Linking Is Not A Crime
from the will-this-backfire? dept
The Pirate Party in the Czech Republic is trying to show that linking is not a crime by putting up sites that merely link to some infringing material. The party is doing this to support a high school student facing massive fines for linking to some works covered by copyright. I do wonder, however, if this will backfire. Law enforcement, industry folks and politicians who simply don't understand the technology will not realize the point of such a site, and merely assume that it's yet another "piracy" site. I would think a more effective means of doing this would be to merely iframe the results of a Google search...![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, czech republic, linking
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Framing *IS* LInking *IS* Piracy... so Use a Google Serach result
That lawsuit would be fun to watch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Attempting to calculate outcome...
Decompiling the mind of a government official...
Result:
while (self.attention_span < goldfish.attention_span)
{
�government.ban(Google);
�try
�{
��self.use(Google);
�}
�catch (search_engine x)
�{
��government.unban(x);
�}
}
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: an alternative
{
try
{
// ban can throw a public outcry exception is outcry level above threshold
government.ban(Google);
try
{
self.use(Google);
}
catch(search_engine x)
{
// just throw. no need to check threshold
throw new public_outcry(x.target);
}
}
catch (public_outcry po)
{
government.unban(po.target)
}
}
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Who is led by the all mighty re-election dollar without knowing anything == Politicians
Who states they gains the most from banning piracy. == MAFIAA
Who gains the most money, experience and claims they they are only doing what is in best interest of clients == Lawyers
Therefore on a sliding scale of idiocy I'd say Lawyers were most intelligent, followed by Mafiaa, then coming in a dead last are politicians.
QED
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Politicians are being re-elected.
Lawyers are laughing all the way to the bank.
MAFIAA are paying for it all and geeting nothing of real value in return. MAFIAA are definitely top of the stupidity league.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any time I use such a method, always, without exception, I provide a source link, show no hyperlinks that might be within the source text, and very rarely even post an image. As habit, the reader is reminded that those items are within the original source and encouragement is provided to see that same source.
Without links, that habit proves hard to continue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not really buddy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks to Monty Python.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]