Swiss Justice Minister Decides That ISPs Should Have To Retain Data Despite No Legal Basis

from the well-that's-one-way-to-do-things dept

There are big debates in both the US and Europe about the reasonableness and legality of requiring massive data retention by ISPs. However in Switzerland, the Justice Minister, Simonetta Sommaruga, has decided to dispense with all of that and has just told ISPs they have to start retaining all sorts of data even if there's no direct reason for it (link is a Google translation from the original French). Apparently various companies are now protesting this, but it takes a special sort of out of touch politician to simply declare such a thing without realizing the widespread legal debates in other countries about the legality and usefulness of this very thing...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: data retention, law enforcement, privacy, simonetta sommaruga, switzerland


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Tor (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:21am

    The article doesn't tell me much. Is there anyone from Switzerland here who could try to explain what this is all about?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 2:41am

    It is about massive data retention : All data that goes to or from a swiss Internet connection must be logged, so when (if) a future investigation require the data, it can be accessed.

    The big problem is, however, that Simonetta Somarunga didn't asked for the stakeholder's opinion and review (ISP, consumer protection societies, experts...) and that that the decision will not be voted by the population, as normally done when modifying the law because it was passed as an ordinance. In facts, the modification was only an update of the ordinance, which already had some dispositions for post and telephone.

    The furtive manner of passing this ordinance and the fact that it is not easily fought by consumers and ISP had raised some protests.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Tor (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 3:13am

      Re:

      Thanks for the clarification. I don't understand the exact meaning of "ordinance" in this context. Is this a law that was preceded by a parliamentary vote or just some kind of regulation? (this can make a big difference when determining whether this is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights)

      Surely "all data" cannot be logged, so I assume that you are talking about traffic data. It would be interesting to see this aspect being compared to the EU data retention directive.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        The eejit (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 3:36am

        Re: Re:

        I suspect that it's a by-law, rather than a full-on Bill.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 6:59am

        Re: Re:

        I'm not really sure about which data will be logged, I assume it is traffic data.

        In Switzerland, an ordinance is a law written by the Federal Council, in areas where it is competent to do so (because of federal laws or constitutional). This generally rules of application (execution) of federal laws. (Wikipedia [fr])
        In contrast with the law, the ordinance does not require a vote from the population in order to be implemented.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    out_of_the_blue, 2 Aug 2011 @ 7:07am

    Legal basis, HA! We don't need no stinking legal basis.

    I'm telling you people, you're living in the 20th century. There's still a slim pretense of gov'ts obeying laws, but less every day.

    Switzerland is not the bastion of freedom that particularly Americans think: headquarters of international banking, those secret accounts enable much skullduggery around the world besides artificially inflate the touted Swiss prosperity, and the political climate is close to a rigid German model. There's a myth that the Nazis passed it by because every Swiss has an automatic rifle, but in fact, Switzerland was USEFUL to Nazis as destination for stolen gold, and it's still HIGHLY useful to globalists and spy agencies as a way to invisibly transfer bribes.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      The eejit (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 7:34am

      Re: Legal basis, HA! We don't need no stinking legal basis.

      Then perhaps it's time to set fire to everything, and rebuild from scratch.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    abc gum, 2 Aug 2011 @ 7:28am

    "I'm telling you people, you're living in the 20th century."

    The 20th century is so yesterday

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Qûr Tharkasdóttir (profile), 3 Aug 2011 @ 1:24am

    Good girl

     
    The last few years, Switzerland has been trying hard to be the good girl in the gang: economy, financial activities, policing and of course military cooperation, to name the essential ones, are all domains in which integration with EU-US aka. NATO has been on the agenda. A month ago or so, this has even stretched to Switzerland obeying Israel's injunction to stop visitors to Palestina from flying. So we shouldn't be all too surprised if this pattern now extends to so-called security.

    If the growing political/free speech censorship we are witnessing on the European internet – under all kinds of pretexts: copyright infringement or the specious interpretation of diffamation laws – now extends to Switzerland, it might be interesting to watch what will happen with those activists and bloggers (Beppe Grillo is one name that stands out) who either are hosted or have declared their intention to be hosted on Swiss servers.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 10:27am

    I was not a fan of this. Just ridiculous.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.