Spanish Appeals Court: Linking Is Not Infringement
from the and-again dept
For a few years now, we've been pointing out that various Spanish courts have reasonably ruled that merely linking to infringing works hosted elsewhere is not infringement. It seems that Spanish courts have to keep repeating this, and now there's yet another ruling, this time from an appeals court, once again pointing out that linking is not infringement. It's nice to see the courts keep saying this, though it only seems to give fodder to the entertainment industry to whine about how Spain's copyright laws need to be fixed. Let's try this on for size instead: it actually seems to show that Spain knows how to properly apply liability and to not blame an intermediary service provider for actions of its users.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But... but... but piracy!
And let "properly applying liability", due process, human rights and common sense be DAMNED. /sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: But... but... but piracy!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How can any number be infringing?
One of my side research activities is to represent any number in various formats (as per AOCP). This would mean that any binary number could be stored in different formats and hence how would one know what it was or what it represented? So that the same number could be a movie, a document or just a very long number depending on the person using it.
The thing that strikes me as being strange is that if you reverse the order of bits in the binary number you now have a number that is completely different. So how is this now infringing.
At all times, everyone has the use of every number imaginable, so how can someone say that they own a number which does not have physical existence and that no-one else is allowed to use that number.
Some people seem to have some weird and wacky ideas, though mind you there are still people who think that the world is flat or that macro-evolution is a proven fact.
Live Long and Prosper.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyrights are pointless in the digital age
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How can any number be infringing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How can any number be infringing?
For a while I got into the habit of spelling such words as "colour" and "honour" the English way; it still comes naturally to me and sometimes I have to remember not to. while I was doing that -- and extending it to similar words -- one day it occurred to me that unfortunately I didn't actually know the rules. So I was probably applying it where it didn't fit.
Since I'm not currently interested in investing scads of my time and effort learning a whole second set of spelling rules, I decided to just revert back to what I know. Better I spell using the rules I know than screw up the rules I don't know.
Thing is, we don't speak English here. We speak American. Once you realize that you'll stop complaining about our spelling. It's simply a different language with a lot of similarities.
:)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
so avagoonite.
We face the problem here that teachers teach children to spell consistently not correctly. So my comments were not a criticism but an attempt at humour - something that my wife and children consider somewhat off the planet. My daughter did marry a man like her father and my son-in-law has a sense of humour that brings as many groans as mine does.
I know my youngest still asks me how to spell words even when he has the dictionary sitting beside him.
Live Long and Prosper.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
The question to be asked then is if you can copyright one form of representation does that mean all representations of that number are automatically copyrighted by the person or company that has copyrighted the original representation? Even though they may not have considered alternate representations of that number.
Secondly, what is the situation, where a single number is used to represent a document, and image, a movie, an encryption key, etc? Does the person or company who obtained the original copyright on that number then hold the copyright on all interpretations of that number irrespective of who has come up with the number itself?
When a number can be copyrighted, from my point of view, it then opens a can of worms for which there is no simple, clear, precise and logical answer. Though when one starts looking at lawyers, laws, law-makers and those who carry out the law, once immediately sees that logic is not a strong point of any of these. At least with man-made law systems.
Live Long and Prosper.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anywhere In The World.
Rojadirecta is making a lot of noise about suing the United States Government, not in the expectation of winning, but merely so that everyone will know where they have gone. The American government is trying to claim a lie-- that it has actually shut Rojadirecta down, rather than merely blocking Rojadirecta-dot-com. Exposing that lie means that the previous users-- and a lot of other people-- intelligently go looking for Rojadirecta in other top-level-domains.
With more than a hundred different top-level-domains to choose from, it is statistically inevitable that the pirates would be able to find someone, somewhere, with an antagonistic attitude towards copyright-holders. One top-level-domain is all that is needed. I believe that the American State Department noted, in some of the Wiki-Leaks documents, that Spanish public opinion does not support copyright, that the attitude "on the street" resembles that of a third-world country, rather than that of the United States. It is hardly surprising that Spanish jurists tend to put this attitude into legal language. There will always be some country or other, which has little or no ability to export its own culture, for which royalty payments represent a drain on foreign exchange.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remember, Mike, it's the World Wide Web, not the World Wide Spain. Thankfully the rest of us are not subject to their weak kneed legal system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I'm amazed on how you are the minority and think so highly of yourself ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I read the court documents that Rojadirecta filed in the forfeiture action, and the Spanish court did rule that Rojadirecta facilitates infringement. This can't be good for Rojadirecta since the government's theory is that the website (and by extension, the domain names) facilitates infringement. Even if linking is not itself infringing, that doesn't save your pirate friends.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Too bad for you and your MAFIAA goons ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
> to their weak kneed legal system.
Why not? You guys seem to think the Spanish are subject to our legal system. Why wouldn't the reverse be true?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Anywhere In The World.
There is also proposals for an alternative, de-centralized .p2p domain system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
Same as with vinyl records. It's not like there is a copyright on the indentations made on the plastic, but as long as music can be "read" back from them, them it is a reproduction/fixation of the work. In practice there isn't much difference between making a recording with a needle and plastic, or the MP3 algorithm and silicon (or magnetized disks or whatever can store 1s and 0s).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
Same as with vinyl records. It's not like there is a copyright on the indentations made on the plastic, but as long as music can be "read" back from them, them it is a reproduction/fixation of the work. In practice there isn't much difference between making a recording with a needle and plastic, or the MP3 algorithm and silicon (or magnetized disks or whatever can store 1s and 0s).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
Portugal (my country) has no Mediterranean coast, so it's not technically Mediterranean. Also Latin does not equal south-american. Italian, French, Spanish and Portuguese are all latin languages and cultures. Latin was the (now dead) language of the Roman Empire which ruled over them all.
Central and south-america is called latin-america because the people speak spanish and portuguese, not the other way around. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: How can any number be infringing?
I'm old enough that our schools pretty much taught us to spell correctly. (I mean, American correctly.) I do remember the teacher telling us about a new, alternate method of teaching to spell phonetically, and showing us a book. At the time I thought it was pretty stupid, but heck, I was all of maybe 8.
These days... I'm not quite as arrogantly sure of myself on that opinion, but I'm still not convinced.
What I do know is that if I see a post that doesn't at least approximate English spelling (including substituting single letters or numbers for words), I will pass it by. I used to try to decipher such messages, and after having done so always concluded that it wasn't worth the effort I'd expended. Eventually I decided to stop bothering. I have yet to regret that decision.
[ link to this | view in thread ]