Dutch Communications Agency Cracks Down On Pirate Stations; Can Go From 'Warning' To 'Fine' In 30 Minutes
from the sorry,-lenscrafters,-time-to-step-up-your-game dept
The Radio Communications Agency of the Netherlands has ramped up its efforts against pirate radio stations, which it claims are disrupting non-pirate radio stations along with airline communication. This isn't so surprising, as it has been increasing fines and enforcement over the past few months.In response, pirates have been setting up stations using collapsible antennas (some reaching as high as 40 meters) in order to shift venues, as it were, should The Man suddenly appear. In response to the pirates' response, the Radio Communications Agency has expedited its processes to the point that it can now make this amazing/perhaps unbelievable claim:
The illegal broadcasters could be fined 2,500 euros just half an hour after receiving a warning letter.Without any further details forthcoming, it's hard to imagine how this works. Here in the U.S., it can take months for the FCC to hand down a judgment and fine offending pirate radio stations. Officials in the Netherlands have been able to push their turnaround time down from several weeks over the past several months, and they've got a smaller area to police, but a half hour?
If it can trim it to a half hour between the arrival of the warning letter and the fine, wouldn't it just be easier to include the paperwork for the fine in the same envelope? Or is someone trailing the mail carrier with his or her fingers poised on the speed dial for the local enforcement team? The mind boggles. (And by "boggles," I mean "tends not to believe.") Or maybe it's some sort of EULA ("By reading this letter, you agree to be fined directly for illegal broadcasting...) wrapped in a Mission Impossible-esque self-destruction device, only instead of self-destruction, your warning letter morphs into a bill for $2,500 Euros.
No matter the delivery method, it's a bold claim, one equaled only by Domino's Pizza's long-remembered (but oft-violated) slogan of "30 minutes or it's free." Unfortunately for the pirates, there's nothing free about this offer.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: netherlands, pirate radio, radio, warnings
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They will get the tracking trucks and circle in on them, and then the voice changer mounted to the jeep will break and people will know it was the nerdy new kid all along. But the state will find out that they have been dumping bad test takers, and keeping the money. And then everyone will talk hard on the airwaves!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And then fire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And then fire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next thing you know, they'll put them on ships
Apparently, lessons are never learned...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next thing you know, they'll put them on ships
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I gather the range is enough it is heard outside of The Netherlands. At the end of the Xmas season, they fold it all up and take it away.
He used to keep a web site up with pictures of the crew, the setup, and what songs they would play for the day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
NL isn't so small that you can cover it with just one antenna. You need several to cover the entire country (thank god too, otherwise we'd have had no radio signal a few weeks ago, when the biggest antenna collapsed due to a fire in the tower)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What a waste of resources. They should be going after crimes with actual victims, not victimless crimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Who said it's victimless? If my grandma can't watch her soaps with the volume all the way up, she'll be cranky all night. I call that a victim!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
When you're investigating a victimless crime, yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes.
"Who decides they're victimless?"
If there is no victim, then it's victimless.
"Victimless" as you blindly claim without a shred of fact to back you up is still illegal."
A victimless crime means there is no victim. If you want to claim that there is a victim, then the burden is on you to provide for a victim. Since no person or government is entitled to a monopoly on spectra, no one is being deprived of something that they're entitled to. There is no victim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, that's dumb.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Pirate radio stations set up their broadcasts in those bands that have no broadcasts. I am sure you don't have a radio station for every decimal point in your neck of the woods.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
But who's interfering with who's signal? Since we all have an equal natural right to those signals, the 'non-pirates' are also interfering with the 'pirates' just as well.
I have just as much a right to those signals as anyone else. If any government doesn't like it, I vote we collectively overthrow that government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Good luck overthrowing your abusive government. I'd love to see you fail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, because some people are just born more entitled than others by virtue of the fact that they did nothing to deserve it.
Of course we all have an equal natural right. Even the founding fathers agree with this.
"People/organizations have given ranges and power they're allowed to broadcast."
Yes, because he with the biggest guns have more rights, and since governments have more guns and weapons, they have more rights. Is that how the world works?
"It's called the Spectrum and it's tightly regulated."
Might makes right, is that how it works?
"Pirate means you completely ignore said regulation, regardless of any damages you may cause legitimate users of the legitimate signal you're snuffing out."
and who decides what users are 'legitimate'. Oh, that's right, those with the biggest guns, is that how it works?
"That's illegal last I checked."
and the law is the ultimate authority of morality and what should be because you said so. Because the legislators with the biggest guns said so. Right?
"Good luck overthrowing your abusive government. I'd love to see you fail."
At least you admit our government is abusive. Yes, our government is abusive, yes it has the most guns, yes everything it does is immoral, yes we're powerless against it, but that's no reason for us not to try. We should not tolerate governmental abuse, we should resist. It maybe tough, we may have a disadvantage, but that's no excuse to just give in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Even if they have broadcasters, I do not care. I have just as much a right to broadcast as them, and if the government doesn't like it, I say we overthrow that government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No, I have just as much a right to broadcast on those spectra as anyone else. No one has more of a right to broadcast on any spectra as anyone else. There is no such thing as a 'rightful' holder, we're all rightful holders.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legality
It's a bit like the bible. We know the bible is the one and only truth, because it says so itself. Perfect logic.
So, when they are acting totally crazy, it suddenly is not crazy anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just look at his attitude and his articles. They say it all.
A good analogy would be how a girl (content) was saying she was being raped (pirated) and the offender's defense was simply "deal with it."
Mike Masnick thinks creators need to "deal with it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not sure why the analogy is popular, possibly because it is viewed as a method in which difficult things are made easier to comprehend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fail 1 - Tim post.
Fail 2 - Trying to imbue content with human characteristics to get a response so you can bait someone into an argument where you claim the moral high ground of if you believe this you believe in rape being acceptable.
Fail 3 - This post had nothing to do with content, but was about the idea that they could send a letter and 30 minutes later begin assessing fines.
Fail 4 - As a troll, you should really stick to your daily talking points rather than try to wing it on your own... your not very good at this.
Thanks for playing, please send wave 2.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
a person (this article) was strangled (deliberately misread by a stupid troll).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their taking our radio station !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Registered Mail?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Registered Mail?
The pirate broadcasters have moved to a mobile setup now and can more than likely be out of anywhere in well under 30 min.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Registered Mail?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbTQPAhI9zQ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Registered Mail?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the pirate site is mobile (no fixed address) how could the letter be delivered?
You print out and send a letter to "Pirate Station, 1000 Holland Road, Netherlands", but the pirate station has moved to "5000 Windmill Road, Netherlands", there's no proof of delivery!
It's the wrong address!
What verification could be provided that would hold up in court?
"We never received the letter, Your Honor!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
retroactive fining?
And, unless they used recorded delivery, there is no 100% guarantee that the letter arrived the next day, so that sentence already looks pretty weird.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: retroactive fining?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh no, wait, Mike will say "it wasn't me", and weasel word his way out of it again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you want to debate with us here, go right ahead. There was a commentator called Bob yesterday who was quite vocal, but at least s/he made an honest effort, despite the fact lots of us disagreed with him/her. You though...f*ck this, I'm just gonna stop this here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
f*ck me, you are dense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That's what you wrote. You said that Mike wrote this piece and will later claim "It wasn't me".
And how do you know these unauthorized radio stations paid for the music or not? Ever hear about innocent until proven guilty? More than likely yes, but I'm not going to judge them because I don't know for sure one way or the other.
This article has nothing to do with copyright infringement. It talks about people setting up radio stations without going through the legal process and of the Netherlands now suddenly being able to send fines within a half hour of sending a warning. It doesn't talk about infringement. Whether or not these guys bought the CD's isn't in the purview of the article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
no u
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's not about 'intellectual property' but rather about broadcast-licensing.
And the post isn't even about getting rid of a monopoly power of a government.
Strike 3! You'rrrrrrre OUT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]