Does The Punishment Fit The Crime? Is Manslaughter An Equivalent Crime To Copyright Infringement?
from the manslaughter-is-about-the-same dept
Via ZeroPaid, we learn of a fun article in the French publication Numerama, which tries to compare the length of time in jail one could get for file sharing in France to a few other crimes (Google translation from the original French). The results are telling, in terms of just how extreme current copyright laws really are. The article includes two lists. The first is of crimes that can get you about the same amount of time in jail. This list includes:- Manslaughter
- Sending death threats
- Doing biomedical experiments on a person without consent
- Provoking someone to commit suicide.
- Theft
- Escaping prison
- Forgery
- Exposing yourself in public
- Sexual harassment
- Domestic violence
- Identity fraud
- Abandoning a family
- Getting a minor drunk
- Making sexual advances on someone less than 15 years old
- Abuse and cruelty to animals
- Destruction of property
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, france, punishment
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It would make you think, perhaps...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, wait...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh no! I think AC's internet connection was cut halfway through his comment(probably HADOPI). Now we may never know what he perhaps thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I suppose you're right, but it's not a positive thought...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That the existence of those two independent crimes obviously proves that infringement is not theft, but a separate violation?
YES! You GOT IT! I'm so proud of you! I would pat you on your head right now if I could, but my priest tells me that would be cheating....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Now, that being said, just like there is petty theft, there could be petty infringement. Clearly, a kid stealing a piece of candy from the candy store doesn't get 20 years in prison.
It sort of makes you think that this post is a bit of a strawman, comparing "trading a couple of files" with grand theft.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The post is pointing out how ridiculous the comparison is.
It is promising that you see the difference between a kid stealing a piece of candy and armed bank robbery.
The fact that you acknowledge there could be "petty infringement" tells me that either there is hope for you to actually comprehend the nature of sharing or (unfortunately) more likely you see that backlash against IP is growing and are trying to establish a middle ground before you loose even what you now have.
I'll be an optimist and hope you are getting wiser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
However, if every kids in town comes in to take a piece of candy, sooner or later there will be calls to do something, to create a punishment that is enough of a deterrent to stop kids from taking candy. Clearly, the price of the candy alone isn't enough to stop anyone.
Also, you have to remember that there is a huge difference between criminal copyright infringement, and the merely civil.
It's sort of a wonderful strawman argument, seemingly the last refuge of the desperate anti-copyright campaigners.
Hey Mike, how come no comment on hotfile getting ordered to turn over their stats and account information?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
In France, as the law stands, you currently get less jail-time for attempted molestation of children than you can for copyright infringement.
If that isn't a fuck-up sense of priorities, I don't know what is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Perhaps maybe the real story is that " attempted molestation of children " in France isn't treated as a serious crime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If someone goes in and "takes" a "piece" of music via an unauthorized digital download, remind me again what's missing and from where?
Please don't go calling foul for other's strawman arguments, when you use a strawman yourself to refute the original response.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your blatant corporate feudalism
It's a basic element of our Bill of Rights.
These are the things that the original states wanted added to the Constitution before they would go along with it. They were afraid of the abuses of a large central government.
They didn't want the feds to trample over rights that they held dear.
The Bill of Rights isn't just a good idea. It's the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If they aren't catching anyone, how will a bigger deterrent work?
Will every candy store get its own designated cop?
Or will store owner be told to police his store better or get more staff?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Careful now DH! you know what goes on inside that head!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright infringement should in fact be on the list of capital crimes, and anyone who disagrees is a freetard!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I agree, we can then go after the guys at the newspapers for copyright theft for each image they have pilfered and have them executed. We can use DOJ to extradite the record label exec's in canada for their two decade long piracy spree of mbest of CD's. We can finally see and end to Lily Allen and her unauthorized mix tapes. We can go after politicians that use songs for their campains in an unauthorized way and put them to death.
I love double edged swords ... :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Troll
Thank you very much for attending.
We will continue offering quality trolling in the next coming days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: anonymous coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the RIAA website:
So hijacking, rape, murder, assault, etc. on the high seas is "too benign" a comparison to make with file-sharing?
Talk about a screwed up sense of ethics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the RIAA website:
A couple of excerpts from the Wikipedia entry on Piracy in Somalia (since it's a topic most people are aware of):
"Pirates' income from ransom has been estimated to be about 39 million euro (about $58 million) in 2009 and $238 million in 2010. However, indirect costs of piracy are much higher and estimated to be between $7 to 12 billion as they also include insurance, naval support, legal proceedings, re-routing of slower ships, and individual protective steps taken by ship-owners."
"Somali piracy operations extol significant human cost. Thus in 2010, 4,185 seafarers had been attacked and 1,090 were held hostage, a third of these were abused. According to Reuters, 62 seafarers died out of over 3,500 captives during a four year period having been murdered, or from suicide or malnutrition."
So dozens of lives and many billions of dollars lost to actual piracy, but this term is to "too benign of a term to adequately describe the toll that music theft takes on the enormous cast of industry players". That's a pretty bold thing to claim. I'd love to hear an RIAA supporter try to defend it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh No's!
Damn.... I didn't realize this was against the law. I'm guess I'm going to need a new hobby.... sigh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh No's!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh No's!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It depends ...
For example, if you share a song like "Let's talk about sex" from Salt&Pepper with a 14 year old then it would fall into the category "Making sexual advances on someone less than 15 years old"
But if you share any song from the Emo genre then you are "Provoking someone to commit suicide."
Then there is the method of sharing. Un-encrypted bit-torrent is "Exposing yourself in public" but transmitting data according to RFC-1149 could be seen as "Abuse and cruelty to animals"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It depends ...
Holy sweet Mary Jesus... I am kidding but I'm astonished to find myself thinking I wouldn't be surprised if some coypright moron agreed with me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It depends ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It depends ...
Holy sweet Mary Jesus... I am kidding but I'm astonished to find myself thinking I wouldn't be surprised if some coypright moron agreed with me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It depends ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It depends ...
So, yes.
And yes, I did know that off the top of my head ;p
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It depends ...
Just...wow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It depends ...
Next time I will use /joke tags.
For those who don't know what RFC-1149 is http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It depends ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It depends ...
;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
is it worse...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: is it worse...
If you put someone in a cage for years, they are going to have almost nothing to do, chances are they might 'sing a song' while in their cage, and the middlemen could claim the copyright on that and put the next person who copies it in the cage next to them..
Am I doing this right? trolling can be difficult....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: is it worse...
You left out the follow up...when the next person is put in the cage next to them, then, when the original captive sings the middle man can bust them for a public performance!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other prisoners: "WOW MAN! We are jealous of you!"
Prisoner 02: "I've killed 153 individuals. All after torturing them brutally."
Other prisoners: "Holy crap, you are THE MAN!"
Prisoner 03: "I infringed copyright."
Other prisoners: "For God sake, have you no decency? You low life scum. Vermin. DEVIL. You should be ashamed of being alive!"
Somehow I can't picture that scene. It's too much of an inversion of values.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and we would take care of our own, if anybody messes with us, we'll leave soo many angry comments on his cell wall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about copycat killers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
how much for grand theft?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: how much for grand theft?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
heh
and 5 years for infringements.
Fair is fair -.-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]