Swedish Teenager Turned Over To Police By School Headmaster For File Sharing Acquitted By Court

from the one-part-of-this-is-absurd dept

Tue, Aug 30th 2011 12:58pm — Mike Masnick

Last week, there was a lot of attention to criminal charges brought against a 15-year-old kid in Sweden, after his school's headmaster turned him over to the police after discovering some downloaded films and file sharing software on his computer. It did seem absurd to charge him with a crime, rather than civil infringement, but that's what happened, and the prosecutor in the case seemed almost gleeful about the possibility of convicting the boy of a crime. Except... it took just a few days for the court to acquit the boy. The ruling involved a head judge and three "lay judges." From my understanding of the Swedish judicial system, "lay judges" are somewhat (though not exactly) akin to a jury in the US (Swedes feel free to chime in and clarify). There was apparently a split among the lay judges, with two voting against conviction and one being in favor. The split resulted in acquittal. The prosecutor, rather than recognizing the sheer absurdity of the case, instead insists that it's "absurd" the kid was acquitted, and now vows to appeal. Because there's nothing more important than convicting someone of a crime for sharing a couple movies. Honestly, if Swedish prosecutors wanted to draw more support for the Swedish Pirate Party, I don't think they could have picked a better strategy.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: acquittal, copyright, crime, school, sweden

35 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:02pm

Bork Bork Bork
Bork Bork Bork Bork
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:18pm
  
  Re: Bork Bork Bork
  Great, now I got to run this thru Babelfish to get an answer to that judicial question...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Fushta (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:44pm
  
  Re: Bork Bork Bork
  Per Google Translate: No definitions found. Please reply in English :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Groove Tiger (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 11:57am
  
  Re: Bork Bork Bork
  Ok, I think I understand what happened, from the original article.
  
  The content companies wanted the teenager to lay some eggs, via payment for watching/hearing their music/videos. Instead, the headmaster found out that the teenager instead had laid a bomb, which was in the form of pirated content in his computer. He chased the teenager with a rolling pin but he managed to get away, so he turned him in to the swedish prosecutor, who then put the teenager in a pot. But then the court opened the pot and let the teenager go free. And now the prosecutor is threatening to appeal and pursue the teenager with a meat cleaver.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rick Falkvinge, 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:14pm

Lay Judges
For once, I'll try to be a bit informative. :)

The Swedish system works like this: you have an educated judge who went to law school in a panel of four at the lowest court. The other three are politically appointed from the municipal level.

They vote on the verdict. In the case of a 2-2 split, the option that favors the defendant wins. Here, two out of four wanted to acquit, so acquittal it is.

The idea with this is that if a law is obviously bonkers and out of touch with reality and, as it's called, "the public perception of justice", then the lay judges are able to overrule the schooled judge.

In terms of checks and balances achieved, it is therefore similar to the jury system.

However, the lay judges are in a minority in the appeals court, and absent from the supreme court.

Cheers,
Rick
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TheBigH (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:21pm
  
  Re: Lay Judges
  Thanks for the info. This seems like a sensible system that can defend itself to some extent against the letter of the law being used to obtain clearly perverse results.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - WysiWyg (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 2:26am
    
    Re: Re: Lay Judges
    No, the system is not sensible. It just means that the political arm gets their fingers in the judicial arm.
    
    It's an affront to democracy. Just because they for once ruled "the right way", does not mean that the system works. Even a blind squirrel you know...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- el_segfaulto (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:25pm
  
  Re: Lay Judges
  Excellent explanation. Very much appreciated.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- WysiWyg (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 2:28am
  
  Re: Lay Judges
  You forgot to mention that "the public" in "the public perception of justice" is defined as "whatever The Party says", not necessarily what the "general public" feels.
  
  Your entry almost reads as a defense for this insanely broken system. Please tell me that I'm mistaken.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thomas (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:15pm

Wonder how much..
the courts there are getting from the swedish equivalent of RIAA/MPAA to prosecute the kid?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:16pm

Cue trolls crying about Mike 'defending piracy' in 3 2 1...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mumfi., 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:46pm

Will never hold in the appeal court.
If the Judges had ruled according to the law they would have convicted the kid. He has confessed to the factual circumstances and he has "ups�t" (intent to commit the crime) or at least likgiltighetsups�t which implies that he probably would have done it even if he knew it was illegal. An upper court will convict.

Also, even if he is not convicted for lack of intent (dolus), the copyright holders may still drive the case in a civilian court for damages, as he after all has confessed the circumstances (culpa). And really the damages is the real punishment here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 2:03pm
  
  Re: Will never hold in the appeal court.
  I'd say the damage is already done at this point, the whole '15 year old kid' part will further dehumanize the pro-copyright people in the eyes of the Swedish public.
  It's a win-win for the Pirate Party regardless of the outcome of the case, and a PR nightmare for anyone arguing for stronger copyright.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:36pm
  
  Re: Will never hold in the appeal court.
  I am more curious how they got statements from a minor who had no one there to make sure this rights were being upheld.
  
  I don't claim to understand the differences in the legal systems from the US to Sweden, but one would expect that a teacher demanding answers from a student to use in a criminal case would be looked upon poorly.
  You have someone in authority demanding answers - or else.
  
  Can anyone share information about how the system works in Sweden per the rights of the accused and such please?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Mumfi., 31 Aug 2011 @ 1:48am
    
    Re: Re: Will never hold in the appeal court.
    In Sweden there is no such thing as illegal evidence. All evidence may be used regardless of how it was obtained, even hearsay or illegal searches and such. Evidence is then evaluated by the Judges. If the boy was questioned without a parent percent, that�s another court case right there, it does not affect the admittance of the questioning protocols as evidence thought.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - That Anonymous Coward (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 5:36am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Will never hold in the appeal court.
      thank you for explaining that.
      
      I'm shocked by it, but I think that is because we have a much different system in the US that we like to think is "fair" and from our point of view that is "wrong" to allow everything in even if it was gathered illegally.
      
      But it seems like Sweden has things in place to help keep the scales balanced.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TN, 30 Aug 2011 @ 9:15pm
  
  Re: Will never hold in the appeal court.
  I just HAD to Google Translate 'likgiltighetsups�t' to hear what it sounds like :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
JesseJ, 30 Aug 2011 @ 1:48pm

Swedish Courts
Your description is fairly consistent with Stieg Larson's when they are trying Salander toward the end of "The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Steve R. (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 6:24pm
  
  Re: Swedish Courts
  In watching the three movies I was very intrigued by the machinations of the Swedish judicial system.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 2:02pm

"Because there's nothing more important than convicting someone of a crime for sharing a couple movies"

No, it is "Because there's nothing more important than convicting someone of a crime."

Mike, you have become a real apologist for all sorts of illegal behaviour recently. What gives?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ven, 30 Aug 2011 @ 2:21pm
  
  Re:
  No, it is "Because there's nothing more important than convicting someone of a crime."
  
  And here I thought that seeing that justice is done was more important.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:16pm
  
  Re:
  AC, you've been using more and more strawmen lately. What gives?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- el_segfaulto (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:29pm
  
  Re:
  So, as a United Statsian I am obviously for convicting people of crimes provided that they are proven guilty AND that the punishment is in proportion. This is equivalent to ruining somebody's life for running a stop sign (a crime with more serious repercussions than any non-commercial IP infringement).
  
  If it was a slap-on-the-wrist and/or some community service it would be one thing. I will certainly grant the European system hasn't been doling out excessive penalties like the **AA lackeys on this side of the pond, but anything more than 10x the lowest commercial price for the films in question is completely disproportionate to the actual damage done to society by his "crime".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ed, 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:53pm
  
  Re:
  Oh come on, be real !! We are not talking about murder or kidnapping or assault. So, according to you, let's build thousands of jails with tax payers money for the millions who at least once in a lifetime downloaded a movie for private viewing. There are zillions of more important things in life, stop being uptight.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Aug 2011 @ 5:02pm
  
  Re:
  And you are out of touch with reality if you believe sharing anything is any kind of crime.
  
  Apologist for authoritarianism?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Paul, 30 Aug 2011 @ 11:04pm
  
  Re:
  It's a civil matter not a criminal one.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- G Thompson (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 11:46pm
  
  Re:
  No, it is "Because there's nothing more important than convicting someone of a crime."
  
  So therefore using your logic, the USG or the individuals in the DOJ should be charged with misprision because they have NOT charged anyone with the alleged crime in the 'Puerto 80' matter.
  
  Think you will find the relevant Federal offence under 18 U.S.C. � 4:
  Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ASTROBOI, 30 Aug 2011 @ 2:57pm

Ironic
The irony is; we can't show you a picture of the kid or even tell you his name because his privacy is so important. But we can put him in jail or screw up his life. But only in private.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
btr1701 (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 3:24pm

Appeal
> The prosecutor, rather than recognizing the
> sheer absurdity of the case, instead insists
> that it's "absurd" the kid was acquitted,
> and now vows to appeal.

The government can appeal an acquittal in Sweden?

Holy crap. That's much more troublesome than an inappropriate application of copyright law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- abc gum, 30 Aug 2011 @ 5:05pm
  
  Re: Appeal
  double jeopardy?
  
  I'll take Full-Retard for 500 Alex.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That Anonymous Coward (profile), 30 Aug 2011 @ 11:42pm
    
    Re: Re: Appeal
    One wonders if double jeopardy exists in Swedish courts.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Aug 2011 @ 4:05am

Boy must understand that everything has a price, sharing is for criminals.

You want food? PAY.
You want water? PAY
You want help? PAY
You want culture? PAY

PAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAY PAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAYPAY

Now go to jail to be sodomized and think about it, muhahahahah.

Then come out as a true criminal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Sean, 31 Aug 2011 @ 3:19pm
  
  Re:
  I'll share something with you, You're a Troll...
  
  Now sue me.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 31 Aug 2011 @ 6:15pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Troll not troll,
    
    thank you
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DannyB (profile), 31 Aug 2011 @ 9:44am

Fixed that for you
> Honestly, if Swedish prosecutors wanted to draw more
> support for the Swedish Pirate Party, I don't think
> they could have picked a better strategy.

Honestly, if Swedish prosecutors wanted to draw more
support for the Swedish Pirate Party, I don't think
they could have picked a better TRAGEDY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]