Day Before Patent Reform Was Signed, Mad Dash By Trolls To Sue: 51 Cases Against 680 Defendants

from the in-under-the-wire dept

While we still think that the new patent law that was signed by the President last week won't do much to make a difference, it does appear that a bunch of trolls who were at least a little concerned about the "joinder reform" part decide to sneak in as many cases against as many defendants as possible before the law went into effect. As you may recall, one of the few useful parts of the law was that it made it harder for patent holders to lump together totally unrelated companies into a single lawsuit. Doing so was popular for a variety of reasons: it's cheaper, obviously, but also because it made it easier to justify an East Texas (or other preferred) jurisdiction.

Groklaw noted a bunch of last minute patent troll lawsuits being filed right before the bill was signed into law, naming three such trolls that brought 12 cases against 222 companies, but also noting that this didn't represent all such cases. In fact, the folks at RPX contacted us with more data on this, noting that 85 cases against over 800 defendants were filed in the two week period before the bill was signed into law... and that includes 51 cases against 680 defendants the day before the bill was signed into law. This is in comparison to an average of about 160 companies sued in a "normal" week for infringement.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: lawsuits, patent reform, patent trolls, patents


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2011 @ 12:54pm

    What a parody our system has become. So pathetic.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2011 @ 12:58pm

    So wait...is patent reform actually changing something, or are these guys just scared for nothing?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2011 @ 1:18pm

    Re:

    These guys are scared because they know The Maz is coming for them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Chosen Reject (profile), 21 Sep 2011 @ 1:49pm

    Re:

    They're not scared about their trolling practices. It's just that they saw their costs were about to go up. This is like buying a bunch of your favorite cereal before the sale ends. It's not that you're afraid you won't be able to buy it after the sale ends, just that you know you can save money now.

    The problem, was the joinder reform was the only useful thing in the bill. The patent trolls will still be able to abuse patent law, they'll just have to pay a bit more because they can't lump all of the defendants into one lawsuit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Mike, 21 Sep 2011 @ 1:54pm

    Re:

    The law pretty clearly changed the way suits against multiple defendants can be brought, aka joinder. Or, to be exact, clarified that it's not enough to have an allegedly infringed patent in common. You need something else.

    After the law passed, you should* see no more cases filed against 100s of defendants together in a single case. What you'll see instead is 100s of different cases.

    This has potential to be both good and bad for defendants. We shall see. The reasons for this are too numerous and complex to explain in a comment, though.

    * I'll note that there have been several cases naming multiple seemingly unrelated defendants filed after the law passed.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Carlos Solís (profile), 21 Sep 2011 @ 2:19pm

    Is the patent system alive and working? Nope, it's Chuck Testa!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    hmm (profile), 21 Sep 2011 @ 3:37pm

    patent reFORM......they just reFORMed the lawsuits into slightly different layouts...the evil scum sucking troll companies that actively want to hurt humanity to make a profit and don't care if children or the elderly or anyone else die as a result of their license scams will keep filing away, knowing its still possible to suck at the tit of humanity without returning anything of value.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    abc gum, 21 Sep 2011 @ 6:16pm

    Attention PatentMart shoppers - BlueLight Special on Aisle six. Get 'em while they're hot.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    patent litigation, 26 Sep 2011 @ 8:49pm

    sorely needed

    This new spate of suits indicates that the new disjoinder rules may indeed be sorely needed. At least now no one can say that Congress isn't doing anything to address the patent troll issue. Even though it's likely not enough to resolve the problem, at least it seems to be a step in the right direction.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    staff, 27 Sep 2011 @ 9:24am

    another biased article

    Masnick has an unreported conflict of interest-
    https://www.insightcommunity.com/cases.php?n=10&pg=1

    He sells blog filler and "insights" to major corporations including MS, HP, IBM etc. who just happen to be some of the world’s most frequent patent suit defendants. Obviously, he has failed to report his conflicts as any reputable reporter would. But then Masnick is not a reporter. He is a patent system saboteur receiving funding from huge corporate infringers. He cannot be trusted and has no credibility. All he knows about patents is he doesn’t have any.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 10:09am

    It's the thought of nothing that scares em

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.