Apparently, FBI's 'Forensics Team' Creates Aged Photos Of Terrorists By Doing Random Google Image Searches

from the is-that-copyright-infringement? dept

Fri, Oct 14th 2011 12:12pm — Mike Masnick

We've all seen those forensic "aging" pictures that are often used to try to show what a fugitive might look like now, when law enforcement doesn't have a recent photo available. I always assumed that there was some sort of science behind doing that. However, it appears that when it comes to the FBI, the way it's done is to do a Google Image search, find an image the FBI likes and then do a simple photo merge with the person they're trying to "age." Of course, that became a bit of a problem recently, when it came out that the photo the FBI used to age both Osama bin Laden and another senior al-Qaida leader, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, happened to be a Spanish member of parliament named Gaspar Llamazares.

Llamazares is not happy about this -- especially since both of the people who his likeness was used to demonstrate have since been assassinated. He's now planning to sue the FBI. I am curious what charges he'll bring. I can't see anything really sticking, to be honest. There might be a copyright claim from whoever holds the copyright on the image -- and that would be pretty amusing, given the Justice Department's rather strong views on the absolute evils of copyright infringement. But really, the whole story seems pretty ridiculous.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: aging, fbi, forensics, gaspar llamazares, osama bin laden, photos

29 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Dark Helmet (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:14pm

Hahaha
"Llamazares is not happy about this -- especially since both of the people who his likeness was used to demonstrate have since been assassinated."

I honestly just can't stop laughing at this sentence. God my government is stupid some times....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:24pm

What, no cries of "fair use" and "non-commercial use" and all that stuff?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:31pm

Re: Hahaha
It's even funnier if you think that FBI often make up its own terrorist plots and solves them. I"d be vewy vewy afraid if I were Llamazares. Since I'm not I'll just laugh hysterically and wish him good luck.

I never thought posting your pics on Facebook could get you into terrorism plots lmao!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:33pm

Re:
Fair use? Yeah, for sure but when it might put his life in danger if not mistakenly connect him to terrorists and give him all sorts of headaches in airports?? PRovide your picture for experimenting, please.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Killer_Tofu (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:36pm

Surprised they don't regularly
At the rate the US government seems to want to use my taxpayer money to fund the IP cartel, and to pass incredibly stupid laws to help fund them, I am not surprised they don't commit copyright infringement more often. That way they can just say "whoops" and directly hand over 150K per instance of infringement to those holding the copyright.

At least using that method to siphon government funds for the copyright nutjobs wouldn't get ridiculous laws passed that harm all of humanity.

(Might be exaggerating but not by much as the laws always harm the entire US citizenry at a minimum)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:36pm

Irony?
On the "If you liked this post, you may also be interested in..."

FBI Successful In Breaking Up Yet Another Of Its Own Plots To Bomb The US

Does The FBI Really Use Surveillance Vans With WiFi SSIDs Saying 'FBI_SURVEILLANCE_VAN'?

And I rofl'd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
crade (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:44pm

isn't that george clooney?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:48pm

Re:
Couldn't be; George Clooney has perfect symmetry and a smaller nose.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rikuo (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:52pm

Re:
Can't be George Clooney - a woman in her 40-50's just walked by my screen when I had that picture up and she didn't swoon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:55pm

Re: Hahaha
"my government is stupid some times...."

They're smart sometimes too ... :)

J/k.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
gojomo (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 12:58pm

Attack of the Drones
When the assassination drones home onto their targets by facial recognition, then he'll have a good case. Of course, then it may be too late (for him).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
aguywhoneedstenbucks (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 1:09pm

Re: Irony?
Mine is FBI TORRENT TRACKER
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 1:35pm

"I always assumed that there was some sort of science behind doing that. However, it appears that when it comes to the FBI, the way it's done is to do a Google Image search, find an image the FBI likes and then do a simple photo merge with the person they're trying to "age.""

Oh, so that's how face aging works. I was always wondering about that. Let me see here.

Michael Jackson + John McCain = George Bush (in ten years)

Elvis Presley + George Washington = Arnold Schwarzenegger (in 20 years).

Dick Cheney + Britney Spears = Donald Trump (in 15 years or so).

I think I'm starting to get the hang of this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
anonymous, 14 Oct 2011 @ 1:44pm

a case of 'mistaken identity' could drop him right in the crap! if an FBI agent doesn't know a person is already dead, he could be killed all over again. that would prove interesting! think of the publicity it could bring until it was revealed 'oops! we goofed again!'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hothmonster, 14 Oct 2011 @ 2:10pm

We can't trust this "Llamazares," if that is his real name, he looks like a terrorist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Devil's Coachman (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 2:52pm

Re: Re: Hahaha
Yeah, like when did that happen? Citations, please!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Devil's Coachman (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 2:55pm

Re:
How about:

Phyllis Diller + Joan Rivers = Lady Gaga (tomorrow morning, sans makeup)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shane C (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 2:58pm

Photographers viewpoint
From the viewpoint of a photographer, I'd think he'd pursue defamation of character, libel, and probably a few other civil items. The FBI certainly knew (or should have known) who is was, and although he could be considered a celebrity, they definitely knew the situation was false.

This is no different than the National Inquirer publishing a false story. The only way they get away with it on a regular basis, is they buy the stories from people that tell them it's true. Once they know it's false, publishing it would be negligence under the Sullivan rule. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IPTroll, 14 Oct 2011 @ 2:59pm

Re: Re: Re: Hahaha
http://www.fbi.gov/

Go look, you'll find it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 3:00pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Hahaha
ROFLOL, I just noticed, on the FBI's Website, it's National Cyber Security Awareness month.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 3:25pm

"I am curious what charges he'll bring. I can't see anything really sticking"

let me help your ideas.

think about your mothers photo at a Poster of the National Whores Association.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 3:40pm

Distraction
I'm much more concerned about how US intelligence uses social networking any any other data it can gather to build profiles of people who they fell is someone who might commit a crime, then entrap the person by contact out of the blue with a total setup by the FBI, or simply take him out with a drone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 4:10pm

Re:
That was my first thought. My next thought was the Coen Bros' film, Burn After Reading. At least we learned something today.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Atkray (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 5:08pm

Re: OOTB
Ahh,
I wondered why he wasn't posting today.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 14 Oct 2011 @ 6:40pm

Re: Hahaha
> God my government is stupid some times...

Perhaps, but as Mike pointed out, there doesn't seem to be anything legally actionable here.

I'm sure the plaintiff will try some silly stretch of some other cause of action to cover it, but that's no different than the government using 'computer hacking' to go after Lori Drew, which we're all pretty much against around here, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2011 @ 9:24pm

Re: Re:
Or, in this case, it's more like Paris Hilton + Hillary Clinton = Paris Hilton in 5 years. I think that's more analogous to what the FBI did.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2011 @ 10:15am

Re: Re: Hahaha
I never thought posting your pics on Facebook could get you into terrorism plots lmao!

Really?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nasch (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 7:52am

Re: Photographers viewpoint
From the viewpoint of a photographer, I'd think he'd pursue defamation of character, libel, and probably a few other civil items.

What exactly did the FBI say that's false and defamatory?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 11:17am

Hi Mike, this is a year or two old. A quick google search turned up this HuffPo article from Jan 2010. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/16/gaspar-llamazares-bin-lad_n_425989.html

I think the update might be that he is now planning on suing the FBI, but I haven't really looked that closely.
[ link to this | view in thread ]