Roger Ebert Points People To The 'Ebert-Edit' Of Psycho On The Pirate Bay

ICANN Takes Over Time Zone Database; Dares Astrolabe To Sue

from the relax,-we've-got-it dept

Mon, Oct 17th 2011 2:24pm — Mike Masnick

You probably heard a few weeks ago about how an astrology software company, Astrolabe, claimed it now controlled the copyright for the historical time zone database that nearly every Linux and Unix system uses to set clocks to local time... and was suing the two individuals who maintain the database. Of course, plenty of people have pointed out that you can't copyright facts, but facing a lawsuit is no fun, no matter how you look at it.

Late last week, however, ICANN announced that it was taking over the time zone database and would continue to maintain it. It also wasted no time effectively daring Astrolabe to sue it:

"We are aware of the lawsuit," [Kim Davies, a technical manager at ICANN] said. "We believe it's important to continue the operation of the database. We'll deal with any legal matters as they arise."

In other words: Hey Astrolabe, try suing us, because we're ready for you.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, facts, lawsuits, time zone
Companies: astrolabe, icann

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Norm (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 2:01pm

My first thought ...
was "**** yeah, go ICANN!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jay (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 2:08pm

Second thought...
"Oh crap, ICANN..."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Keith_Emperor_of_Penguins (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 2:33pm

I bet Astrolabe is asking
I wonder if ICANN sue them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Poster, 17 Oct 2011 @ 2:47pm

ICANN has my support. Copyright bullies should be treated like the jerkoffs that they are, and Astrolabe is no different.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
iamtheky (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 2:51pm

TD certainly needs a section for celebratory posts so that we can readily identify the companies and individuals seemingly* fighting the good fight.

Maybe update this to something a tad more technical than email:

"current time zone information, which comes from tips sent by volunteers through an email list."

maybe a blog like this where they could connect with fans by always being sold out of T-shirts :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OC, 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:16pm

labe!
Suing over facts is so labe!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:18pm

is this the equivalent of "Come at me bro"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:18pm

Looks like the big brother showed up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Beta (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:31pm

I see your stock falling... falling...
I guess Astrolabe didn't foresee this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:32pm

This should be from the "feeling lucky, punk?" dept.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 3:58pm

Maybe ICANN will be kind and give astrolabe some astrolube when they SLAPP them around!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RobShaver, 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:06pm

What facts are we talking about?
Time zones are not facts ... they are an invention for human convenience. The earth does not rotate in one hour increments. The earth rotates once a day, but decided/declared that there are exactly 24 hours in a day, which we know is not exactly correct.

So I'm glad ICANN is taking some action, I don't think anyone's trying to copyright any facts here. If I'm wrong, please point it out so I can be a little smarter next time.

Peace,

Rob:-]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:14pm

Re: What facts are we talking about?
Based on the logic of your post.....

Names are not facts as they are an invention for human convenience. When you were born instead of giving you a number based on your birth order (an actual fact, but hard to track) you were given a name. And most likely your name is Robert so Rob is not exactly correct either.

Does that mean I can sue you for being named Rob since it is not a fact?

Can you sue somebody else for using the name Rob or Robert?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
PlagueSD (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:17pm

Don't mess with ICANN. They're the ONE entity that CAN make you disappear from the internet...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris Rhodes (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:34pm

Re: What facts are we talking about?
Inventions are not facts?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:48pm

Re: What facts are we talking about?
The problem with your reasoning is basically a category error. The tzdata database stores facts about timezones, not the concept of having timezones itself.

The database contains facts like "The Australia/Canberra timezone is offset +10 hours from UTC, except in the summer months when it is offset +11".

Governments around the world have a nasty habit of repartioning their time zones and fiddling with the Daylight Saving rules. We need a database to keep track of all those rules and the changes to them, so that we can work with dates and times in software.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 4:52pm

Re: What facts are we talking about?
If I'm wrong, please point it out...

Please see Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service (1991).

In part III of that opinion, Justice O'Connor makes clear that �the names, towns, and telephone numbers of 1,309 of Rural's subscribers� are �uncopyrightable facts�.

III

There is no doubt that Feist took from the white pages of Rural's directory a substantial amount of factual information. At a minimum, Feist copied the names, towns, and telephone numbers of 1,309 of Rural's subscribers.�.�.�.

The question that remains is whether Rural selected, coordinated, or arranged these uncopyrightable facts in an original way.�.��.

We conclude that the names, towns, and telephone numbers copied by Feist were not original to Rural and therefore were not protected by the copyright in Rural's combined white and yellow pages directory.�.�.�.

In the copyright context, the word �fact� may approach something of a term-of-art. I hesitate to say that it does, but telephone numbers, in particular, are invented �facts�. Invented by the telephone company: Rural Telephone Company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 5:27pm

Re: What facts are we talking about?
Time zones are not facts ... they are an invention for human convenience.

Veeck v SBCI (5th Cir., 2002)

It should be obvious that for copyright purposes, laws are "facts": the U.S. Constitution is a fact; the Federal Tax Code and its regulations are facts; the Texas Uniform Commercial Code is a fact. Surely, in principle, the building codes of rural Texas hamlets are no less "facts" than the products of more august legislative or regulatory bodies. While the Supreme Court has not stated directly that laws are "facts," it has broadly observed that, as with census data, "the same is true of all facts�scientific, historical, biographical and news of the day. `They may not be copyrighted and are part of the public domain available to every person.'" Feist, 499 U.S. at 348, 111 S.Ct. at 1289.

The Astrolabe v Olson case is in the First Circuit, so the Fifth Circuit's opinion in Veeck is merely pursuasive for that case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 5:38pm

Interesting move by a group that is more typically associated with screwing the Little Guy.

In any case, well played ICANN! Astrolab^Hme, your move!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2011 @ 6:04pm

Am people say copyright don't impact others.
It has a negative impact on everything just look at it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AW (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 7:30pm

...That the internets know where they are? Seriously we don't need to be fortune tellers to find out that they are in Massachusetts, they list it on their website. I've got a friend who runs in those circles, maybe I can get a meet and greet and talk some sense into them, since they obviously can't tell how bad of an outcome this will be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
G Thompson (profile), 17 Oct 2011 @ 9:02pm

Re: I bet Astrolabe is asking
*Thock*

Note: I did press funny on your punny
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 1:41am

I wonder.....
... if this means "time" will now be shut off for random timezones because the DHS has determined that time is a major factor in piracy (synonymous with terrorism of course) and asks ICANN nicely?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Swedish Turnip (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 2:22am

ICANN has internets nao plz?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 2:29am

Re:
> They're the ONE entity that CAN make you disappear from the internet...

No, they cannot. They do not have that power.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Muomar Gaddafi, 18 Oct 2011 @ 5:02am

Re:
ALL YOUR TIME ZONES ARE BELONG TO US!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 5:41am

Re: What facts are we talking about?
Time zones...

Note that Astrolabe v Olson et al is in the District of Massachusetts. A case from that district is Skinder-Strauss v Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education (D.Mass., 1995), where the court opined that, in the context of copyright, information about time zones was so-called �common property.�

.�.�. information that is so-called "common property" and does not vary with the creativity of the compiler. For example, a standard calendar, a list of important holidays, a map of Massachusetts, a national map including time zones, and a date calculation chart are all common forms of conveying information and/or are "ideas" that cannot be considered separately from their expression. After all, there are only a very limited number of ways that an author can render a calendar, date calculation chart, or list of holidays. Cf. Harper House, 889 F.2d at 204, 204 n. 5 (holding that common property such as area code/time zone maps and standard calendars contained in daily organizer are not copyrightable); 37 C.F.R. � 202.1(d) (1995) (excluding from copyright "[w]orks consisting entirely of information that is common property containing no original authorship, such as, for example: Standard calendars, height and weight charts, tape measures and rulers, schedules of sporting events, and lists or tables taken from public documents and other common sources").

Emphasis on �a national map including time zones�.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 5:47am

Re: My first thought ...
Astrolabe probably wet their pants =D

And to quote Obama on this awesome taunt: Yes, ICANN!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 7:26am

We need someone courageous enough to challenge the flaws in our outrageous laws. Even though I can't do it, ICANN can do it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jason, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:19pm

Re: Re:
Sure they can. I can envision an announcement in a few days that will state. "Organizations suing ICANN will not have their Internet addresses and domains renewed."

That should just about do it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:34am

Ouch. This is like suing a small software company then finding out it's a shell corporation funded by Microsoft.
[ link to this | view in thread ]