For VPN Provider HideMyNet DMCA's ABC's Not As Easy As 123
from the you-are-the-weakest-link-goodbye dept
Besides circumventing censorship, one of VPN services' main functions is safeguarding users' privacy. To find out how far these services go to protect their customers' privacy, Torrentfreak conducted a 2-question survey among VPN providers, with mixed results.As I was looking for a VPN provider myself and got tipped about HideMyNet, which is missing from Torrentfreak's overview, I decided to ask them the two questions myself:
Your service has been recommended to me multiple times, but before I start using your service, I have two questions.
1. Do you keep ANY logs which would allow you or a 3rd party to match an IP address and a time stamp to a user of your service? If so, exactly what information do you hold?
2. Under what jurisdictions does your company operate and under what exact circumstances will you share the information you hold with a 3rd party?
A few hours later I received their response:
A baffling response which, besides being rude, also shows the company is completely clueless about the DMCA. We got in touch with a lawyer who's a DMCA expert who had the following to say:1) Yes, any serious company would. I would be concerned about the quality of a company who did not. If no logs are kept it'd be impossible to respond to a DMCA complaint which puts the company liable for a 100,000$ fine. I highly doubt you're going to find any company willing to risk that sort of liability on a 5$/month vpn account. Good luck!
2) USA - Also, it's the jurisdiction of the server endpoint -- Not the company itself.
"Sounds bogus to me. 17 USC 512(m) says the safe harbor is not conditioned on "monitoring the service." However, the service provider will be asked for evidence of its takedown practices, but the service provider only has to give what it's got. The $100k fine is made up too."
Classy, HideMyNet. Inventing a $100,000 fine to scare potential customers into using your service instead of a competitor's. Lesson learned: always make sure a service actually knows what it's talking about before handing over your money and beware of VPN providers that will sacrifice your privacy regardless of whether you are in violation of some country's copyright laws or not.
So what was it HideMyNet: simply unaware of the law? A case of untrained sales representatives being allowed to make up facts? Scared of the weight and money the entertainment industry's lobbies are throwing at suing the hell out of honest companies? Or do you have other motives to hide behind the DMCA?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dmca, privacy, tracking, vpn
Companies: hidemynet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sweden, really?
I wouldn't trust any privacy thingie that was hosted in Sweden no matter what.
Just my snarky opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sweden, really?
I wouldn't trust any privacy thingie that was hosted in Sweden no matter what.
Just my snarky opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
I'd be surprised if any commercial VPN does NOT keep full logs -- despite the opinion in #1. Unless working for the company and know so personally, you're at best gullible, trusting a corporation when their risk is about $100K vs a $5 sale.
No company is likely to say to a gov't: "Sorry, the trail stops here in our server!" -- That leaves them holding the bag, and it may be full of HOT potatoes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
You were saying?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
Did you read the part about the $100k being made up or do you have a citation for that amount?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
"I read the first two paragraphs - time to comment. I'm all in!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
Yes I did, as soon as I saw your "name" beneath the title.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
Sorry OOTB for proving you are wrong, I know that you'll probably just ignore this answer and all the others as we are wrong based upon your unique view of the real world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
http://torrentfreak.com/make-bittorrent-transfers-anonymous-with-btguard-100419/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Did you just skip over "Sounds bogus to me."?
Better than being like you: at best gullible trusting a company rep pulling some /bogus/ numbers out of his ass. OTOH, you certainly can relate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rule #1
EU has strict privacy laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Rule #1
A quick application to the FISA court to "find the terrorists" followed by a secret court order to the VPN providers to retain records would do it.
That combined with the ability to collect "business records" in secret vis a vi the patriot act and the government has all the records it wants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
There really are, after all, much bigger fish to fry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
Storage is cheap. It doesn't take much imagination to see there are only a few internet backbones that are controlled by the government whom are seizing "business records." (ie data traveling over the backbone and security certificates issued within the United States)
That combined with the great breakthroughs in quantum computing means that factoring in polynomial time is just around the corner, if not already here. Meaning all common encryption schemes will soon be, or already have been broken.
Once you understand what the government is technically capable of and legally allowed to do, the fact that you can just buy these congressmen becomes really scary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
When I started to find this within myself is when my smile began to fade.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
You don't actually care about these things until they're about to affect you negatively.
It is possible to bring that smile back. I got a dog. If you treat a dog right, they are friendly, loyal, hard working, and willing to give of themselves for their clan.
They're about the polar opposite of a politician.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
SHE is a little bitch. Pisses me off just like a politician. Demands attention and everything be done HER way.
HE, on the other hand, just wants to be a part of whatever it is you happen to be doing. He also gets demanding if you ignore him, but all he wants is to be included.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
They're about the polar opposite of a politician."
No Way!! Not polar opposites at all. Mostly the same.
Just ask Jack Abramoff. If you treat a politician right (ie. support their re-election, offer a future job as a lobbyist, fund their SuperPAC), they are friendly, loyal, hard working (for you), and willing to give of themselves for their clan.
Are you in their clan? It's easy to tell. If you've had two or fewer closed-door meetings with the pol, then no, you are surely not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
Take Politicians.. They can be equated to quarks since they try to constantly charm you, go up and down on issues like a yo-yo, say they come from the bottom but always try to stay up top of the class system, are extremely strange at any time, have a huge amount of spin generated and leave a very sickly flavour in your mouth after dealing with them in any way.
Also like quarks politicians are never found in isolation and they try to control how they are directly observed. Also they are constantly found surrounded by sycophants with hadrons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
Interesting. Been watching a lot of Star Trek DS9 lately and your definition fits the Ferengi ""Quark" perfectly.
His fixation on "profit" fits perfectly in the current climate of lobbyists and politicians.
I hereby declare all trolls "Ferengi"!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
I wear the same tinfoil hat. The US gov't is not trustworthy about ANYTHING. Incumbents must go at all costs. It's time for time limits. Lifetime politicians must come to an end.
Sorry to hijack this into a political rant, but it's all [political nowadays, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rule #1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Rule #1
Sorry if I wasn't clear, but I'm from the same land as you. Ever since Clinton's term was up, that piece of paper has been treated like toilet paper by the powers that be.
Honestly, should we even have to battle such things? Shouldn't lawmakers think these things through BEFORE they propose unconstitutional laws? Is that not why they are "supposedly" there... because they're supposed to know better? Should more tax dollars need to be spent defending unconstitutional lawsuits just to represent the "PEOPLE" who spoke loudly, and they completely ignored in the first place????
If you're that comfortable with the way things are now late at night, me thinks you're due for a nightmare or two.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
Clinton? Really? The one who tried to mandate the Clipper chip, and make it illegal to have encryption that the government didn't have keys to? That Clinton?
You'd have to go back further than that. Let's see... Former CIA chief? Nope. Guy who spent tax dollars on foreign terrorists? Nope.
I'm not sure how far back you have to go to find a president that actually viewed the Constitution as his defining mandate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
Interesting question. You'd have to go back before my interest in politics, so I'm not really sure. Carter? Johnson? Kennedy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Rule #1
By choosing to focus on "Clinton", you missed my point completely which was that since the turn of the century (Bush, Obama) the problem has grown increasingly worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rule #1
The following countries are safe for VPN because they either do not have any data retention laws or their data retention laws are not applicable to VPN providers. Companies can always choose to keep logs on their own though, so always check their policy.
Argentina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hong Kong
Iceland
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Panama
Romania
Serbia
Sweden
Taiwan
Ukraine
Uni ted States
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://btguard.com/encrypt.php
It can serve as a VPN.
idk if there are extra costs involved or slower speeds but encryption means it functions as a VPN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better alternatives
Rather try one of the following:
vpntunnel.se (payment in Ukash)
mullvad.net (payment in bitcoin)
perfect-privacy.com (LibertyReserve, Webmoney and Paysafecard)
Stay away from StrongVPN. They log and terminate users without proof.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No logs whatsoever. They are very clear about. Great service, fast and reliable connection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VPNTunnel.se and Cryptocloud
HTTP://vpnandusenetreviews.com/vpn/cryptocloud-review
HTTP://vpnandusenetreviews.com/vpn /vpntunnelse-review
A Swedish vpn provider should actually be able to keep their word...btw vpntunnel has a deal going currently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because they die if they use it.
Anything strong enough to keep the creeps out will also attract bandits, so people need to learn first to live with it or do without freedom, personally I prefer the bandits, they are a bit less scary than big brother.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Just because you are interested in these things (or live in Iran or China, etc) does not mean you are interested in piracy.
There is more to the internet than piracy.
Some people would just like to be anonymous. Maybe their ex-girlfriend is a serious stalker. Or their ex-husband is homicidal. Or they just don't want the ad companies to log their visits (they would be logging the VPN, not the end user)
Seriously, think about the world from a different angle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There is no such thing as "Completely Anonymous" on the internet, just higher levels of security...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Tack on VPN and proxies and it's going to be rather difficult to find you...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have a great desire to be left the hell alone and remain unmonitored by my government.
I am sitting here trying to figure out a legitimate reason why anyone would want a VPN connection today.
I have a great desire to be left the hell alone and remain unmonitored by my government.
A reason that does not involve piracy, circumventing regional restrictions, or hacking.
I have a great desire to be left the hell alone and remain unmonitored by my government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In your foggy mind, what is the difference between privacy and anonymity?
I'll give you a hint. There is none.
To answer your questions:
"Why would someone need a VPN connection?"
There are several reasons. To prevent snooping and dpi by unwanted parties like private investigators or to protect trade secrets, military secrets, or any other legitimate secret from prying eyes. VPNs are used in nearly all corporate, military, and governmental infrastructure to keep out prying eyes.
Why would you want to be anonymous?
Maybe you want to communicate with loved one serving over seas without prying eyes getting ideas about troop movements or locations. Maybe you want to communicate with your employer without being known to everyone on the network. Maybe you want to communicate with a private investigator without your spouse knowing. Maybe you want to cheat on your wife.
Throughout history, there have been many, many reasons to want to be anonymous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I used to live in Turkey where the web was censored and I was seriously worried about the government knocking on my door for blogging about them in a critical way. There's a law in Turkey which outlaws "un-Turkish" behaviour or discourse.
Also, I travel a lot and use public WiFi's... I don't want to risk identity theft or people being able to get into my data.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There are tons of legitimate reasons to want encryption and privacy. For example, I do not want information to be gathered about me for tracking purposes of any sort, such as advertising. Using my VPN + a proxy, I can keep my physical location from them and prevent them from looking at my network packets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a system admin and security researcher, I frequently have the need to trace back and or investigate certain pieces of malware.
I do not want to alert my target to my identity or even the subnet that I am coming from as this could provide valuable information about which of their attacks was recognized.
A second point you may want to consider is why should I have to have a specific reason to be anonymous. Why should I have to reveal my identity to check the weather, read news, engage in political commentary, or exchange naughty messages with my wife?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
One example is for people on certain ISP's that have trouble with games like World of Warcraft. The traffic that WoW creates and uses for updating (p2p) is not handled well on some ISPs.
Users will have high latency, disconnects, etc.
So, some users that are playing on a server across the country will pay for a VPN service that is on the same 'tube' that the WoW server is on...better latency...better game play, less disconnects.
Ain't a dang thing illegal or 'piraty' about any of it.
As much as you guys think the world revolves around you, it doesn't. There is a lot of other things going on in the world that have nothing to do with music or movies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
End result?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: End result?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VPN have to log data to work !!!
Sure, there are valid reasons why you might want to use a VPN but as has been explained here there are many 'other' reasons as well.
It also has little to do with the specific VPN provider, it is not something really within their control.
If you believe "the authorities" cannot monitor the traffic going into and out of a VPN then you do not understand much about how the internet works.
The VPN HAS to hold records of you activities, (records are logs), otherwise they would not be able to provide you with that service !!!
if an IP address is accessing the VPN and the VPN is in turn accessing another IP address, and the same IP's keep comming up at the same time, you do not need the 'logs' to work out that the VPN server is that IP to the clients IP.
If you log into your VPN they have to know who you are (you have an account), they have to know your IP and details, and your login info.
But if you honestly think that a VPN would not hold the records of your connection times, and the IP addresses that the server has accessed you are quite clueless.
If you are going to do something illegal, you might consider using a VPN, the 'authorities' know this so one of the first places they will 'check out' is these 'hot spots' of illegal activity.
Especially the ones who claim they do not hold records !!
The best way to avoid conflict with the law is not the break the law.
It is not the best way to avoid conflict with the law by trying to circumvent or 'get around' the law by deceptive means.
Seems like this article is about wanting to break the law, and complaining about that being difficult, and complaining that other companies are not willing to assist you in breaking or possibly breaking laws.
Anonymous and private are not the same thing, a private person says nothing, an Anonymous is not 'private' but the opposite to private, ie, public.
A private person does not say anything, an anonymous person wants to say lots but does not have the balls to put his name to it.
If you do not even have the conviction of your claims to put your name to it, then you are Anonymous.
You can say whatever lies you like as an anonymous commenter, because no one can question you specificially on your claims.
That is how the anonymous want it... true cowards..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: VPN have to log data to work !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: VPN have to log data to work !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why Hidemyass is not on the list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: why Hidemyass is not on the list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
100K fine
HideMyNet does not currently meet "Safe-Harbour" criteria. If you're a traffic middle man it does not mean you receive "Safe-Harbour" status automatically. This is where our current zero tolerance policy comes from. We're working toward receiving Safe-Harbour status so we can be a little more lax regarding Acceptable Use.
However, it is true that you will not find a VPN provider anywhere with USA endpoints that does not log. If a VPN provider is unable to respond to complaints via their uplinks in the US they will be cut off. If a company says they don't log but have USA endpoints they're lying or having to switch uplink providers every week.
In regards to "Classy, HideMyNet. Inventing a $100,000 fine to scare potential customers into using your service instead of a competitor's."
To be quite blunt, I don't know any vpn provider that would want pirates as customers. They're the most time consuming, least profitable, annoying/whiny of any customers or potential customers I've encountered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OpenVPN?
They are in US, do they keep logs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VPN Services
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is what you looking - https://vpnalist.com/proxy-mirror-the-pirate-bay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is what you looking - https://vpnalist.com/proxy-mirror-the-pirate-bay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]