Potential Patent Infringement Threatens To Doom Highly Anticipated Open Source Project

from the promoting-science-through-patents dept

Mon, Nov 21st 2011 1:19pm — Zachary Knight

John Carmack, the guy behind the Doom series of games, has alway been a supporter of open source software. He has in the past released the source code for the original Doom and Quake to the open source community. This open access has led to Doom and Quake being used in a variety of ways and has allowed numerous people to learn how to make games. It has really come as no surprise that Carmack has decided to open source the code for Doom 3. What is surprising though is that move has been held up due to an old patent infringement suit.

Back in 1999, Creative Labs filed for a software patent for a 3D shading technique called "depth fail". When Carmack was developing Doom 3, he independently invented the same technique. This led to some patent troubles that eventually ended with Carmack licensing the patent from Creative Labs. This old wound is now causing pain for Carmack once more. Because his lawyers are not willing to risk another lawsuit over the patent, Carmack is being forced to code a new solution to the 3D shading technique in order to work around the patent. This is holding up the the release of the code to the open source community.

Although the patent issues are a pain in the butt for those in the open source community, one nice thing is knowing exactly what patents you are infringing and exactly what areas of your software need to be reworked to avoid the problem. This is something that other patent holders are not willing to grant to those they are threatening, Take for example Microsoft and its claims that Linux and Android violate its patents. If MIcrosoft would just tell the open source community what it thinks is infringing, then the developers could just work around those issues. Instead, Microsoft insists on using its patents as a weapon to threaten companies into licensing deals. This behavior is well outside the bounds of the US Constitution's clause to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts".

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: doom, john carmack, open source, patents
Companies: creative labs

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

:Lobo Santo (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:25pm

Unless
"This behavior is well outside the bounds of the US Constitution's clause to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts"."
Unless, of course, one counts the art of pointless lawyering.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Nov 2011 @ 2:03pm
  
  Re: Unless
  Make no mistake, being a good/great lawyer is an art. That's why there's tons of hack lawyers and so very few good ones.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - :Lobo Santo (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 2:06pm
    
    Re: Re: Unless
    True, but one could argue that being a good/great anything is an art...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- monkyyy, 22 Nov 2011 @ 12:31am
  
  Re: Unless
  i think its more of a sport then an art
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- hmm (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 2:53pm
  
  Re: Unless
  Unless, of course, one counts the art of pointless lawyering
  
  it clearly says **USEFUL** arts.
  
  Even a lawyer couldn't stretch the truth that he's useful that far......
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:43pm

If MIcrosoft would just tell the open source community what it thinks is infringing, then the developers could just work around those issues.
But then that kills the new buisness model. They need someone to sue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike42 (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:43pm

Late in the game...
It's known as, "Carmack's Reverse", and he already fixed it. John "added four lines and changed two" according to twitter. He also said something about 6 lines of code being a pathetic excuse for a patent.

Still waiting for the release...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike42 (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:45pm
  
  Re: Late in the game...
  It does make one wonder, "what if John had patented the 3D engine?"
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dark Helmet (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:47pm
    
    Re: Re: Late in the game...
    Then obviously other software developers would have routed around the patent by creating an entirely NEW THIRD DIMENSION! Patents promoting progress FTW!!!!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 21 Nov 2011 @ 2:17pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Late in the game...
      "an entirely NEW THIRD DIMENSION"
      
      im pretty sure that is what OOTB comes out of
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 21 Nov 2011 @ 10:51pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Late in the game...
      "an entirely NEW THIRD DIMENSION!"
      
      What about we get more innovative here and create a fourth, a fifth, and a sixth dimension!!!
      
      See, patents promote the progress by encouraging people to create innovative work arounds!!!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Mike42 (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 4:51am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Late in the game...
      Actually, all he did was change it back to the slightly less efficient way to calculate volume shadows, which eats an extra clock cycle. Thus, a 6 line change.
      John WAS a staunch supporter of open source, and didn't patent any of his techniques, because he believed in the golden rule: "I'd be really pissed if I couldn't do something in code because of a patent." (paraphrased from "Masters of Doom" and filtered through my faulty organic memory.)
      I've been noticing some non-open vibes coming from him since ID was bought out. (Endorsing DirectX over OpenGL is one.) I'd be interested to know if he's intending to open-source Tech 5 whenever he develops Tech 6.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- E. Zachary Knight (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 1:52pm
  
  Re: Late in the game...
  That is good to hear. Based on the tweet history though, he is still waiting for confirmation from his attorneys on the changes.
  
  Not surprised that he only have to change a total of 6 lines of code to bypass a software patent.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
vegetaman (profile), 21 Nov 2011 @ 3:43pm

See, the patent system encourages innovation!
See, the patent system does encourage innovation!

Now John Carmack has to innovate a way to get around a patent somebody else filed on an idea he managed to independently discover around the same time.

/sarcasm

(Seriously though, John Carmack is awesome in my book. Open source software all the way!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fb39ca4, 21 Nov 2011 @ 6:00pm

source code
I thought source code is an educational description, and not infringing anyways. See LAME mp3 encoder if you aren't sure what I am talking about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul, 22 Nov 2011 @ 2:32am

As a start up you have limited chances....
I found an article here advizeing on how to avoid patent infrigment.
Nice read, but the conclusion I get from this is that a 2,4 or10 man team these days stand no change on creating something new without a lot of cash to begin with or luck.
The amount of effort to try to create something that is not patent Infringeing is more than it will take to inplemet the idea.
In the end I don't think you can avoid patents so I guess for all developers out there just go and work for big corporations and propose your ideas to them in the end you will get a 5% salary raise and the CEO will get a 5% increase in stock value, I think its a fare thing to do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ahow628 (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 4:59am

Fail is right.
If it is called "depth fail", is it really 3D?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike42 (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 2:50pm

Source Code Released!
And here it is: https://github.com/TTimo/doom3.gpl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmm (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 2:55pm

Why
Why hasn't creative labs died already?

pointless, useless out-of-date products that pretty much no one wants or cares about anymore.

SOMEONE must be keeping this failed business afloat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Henry, 24 Nov 2011 @ 8:43pm

Patent infringement occurs across all industries and all sectors of the economy. There are no Patent Police, so fighting patent infringement is the job of the company that owns the patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]