Google's Next Victim? British Intelligence Services
from the killing-industries-before-killing-industries-was-cool dept
Google is at it again. Not content to singlehandedly destroy the motion picture, music, news and road map industries, Google's all-seeing eye, combined with its search engine, is now threatening the livelihoods of British intelligence agents, who will now be expected to tell their superiors "something they don't already know."According to Sir David Pepper, former director of the UK Goverment Communications Headquarter, the "Google effect" of having so much information available online has "substantially raised the threshold for producing intelligence for MI5, MI6 and GCHQ."
"Nobody wants the easy stuff anymore and there is no point spending effort and money collecting it," said Sir David, who was giving the annual Mountbatten Memorial Lecture at the Institution of Engineering and Technology.Now, not only is it going to be tougher for spies to outspy Google, but results will now be expected to compete with Google's famous fractions of a second.
"Many of the sort of things for which [officials] once would have turned to the intelligence agencies are now readily available to them online," he said.
"Thanks to Google Maps and Streeview anyone can today see photographic detail of far away countries which hitherto would have been available only through secret and highly sophisticated national satellites.
"Intelligence producers have had to become very sensitive to this phenomenon and very careful not to put effort into producing intelligence that purports to be secret which is in fact not secret at all."
Sir David Pepper also said "the Google effect" meant that officials who use secret intelligence were demanding it quicker than ever before.It's not all bad news, however. The "Google effect" can also be used for good, rather than just as a tool to put industries out of business.
"If the intelligence readers are used to getting information online very fast they're going to expect the intelligence agencies to be able to do much the same thing," he said.
But online information was offering opportunities as well as challenges to those in the espionage trade, Sir David said. "You can find out a lot about potential spies without ever meeting them, simply by looking at their online footprints,"* he said.*(Henceforth referred to as the "Facebook effect.")
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: google, intelligence, search, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
He does sound silly though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think he's just commenting on the way things are changing. Pointing out how much easier it is to get the basic information then previously. I wouldn't call it silly as such.
Of course it does raise the question of why we have so many Spooks at GCHQ if so many of them are largely redundant due to improvements of technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16067383
That led to 14 private photos of Mr. Zuckberg to be posted online by others calling attention to the issue.
But what interests me on the story is that the code was pushed to make it easier to denounce somebody and it shows what happens when you try to automate such things, people loose their privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The good ol days...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The good ol days...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyone else...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anyone else...
I need to get up earlier.
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anyone else...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anyone else...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To be fair...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If Google can find it...
Those tags should be pretty much used anytime I want to keep state secrets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If Google can find it...
meta name="robots" content="noindex"
meta name="googlebot" content="noindex"
Also I previewed it this time to make sure it works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Turns out the British Intelligence Service knew it was Google all along.
No wonder LOLcats are so ubiquitous on Google
;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, I would've thought that thanks to Google Maps and Streeview anyone can today see photographic detail of far away countries which hitherto would have been available only if you could afford a plane ticket and a digital camera.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]