Court Recognizes Daily Groupon Deal Hunters Aren't Likely To Be Confused By Groupion's Enterprise Software

from the but-i-want-half-off-my-crm! dept

Groupion provides CRM software as a service (SaaS). Groupon distributes "deal of the day" offers that are typically unprofitable for advertisers and often have the extra "benefit" of causing the advertisers to get trashed on Yelp. Groupion sued Groupon for trademark infringement. I previously blogged on the complaint.

The court denies Groupion's various motions. The court runs through a typical multi-factor likelihood of consumer confusion analysis:

  • mark similarity. Calling this factor "critical," the court concludes that consumers can keep the marks separate. The visual depictions of the logos are different, Groupion has one more syllable, and the words are portmaneaus from different inspirations ("coupon" + "group" vs. "groupware" + "companion").
  • product similarity. "The parties' products are used for different functions and purposes, and are purchased by different classes of consumers."
  • marketing channels. The Internet's commonality is discounted (cite to Network Automation), and the rest of the parties' channels are disparate as you would expect when one company is B2B and the other B2C.
  • mark strength. The court says "Groupion" is weak because others are using similar marks in its field and Groupion didn't show evidence of the mark's commercial strength.
  • intent. Groupion asserted that Groupon must have selected the mark knowing about it, but Groupion didn't provide any evidence to that effect. Groupon's failure to stop after Groupion's C&D was irrelevant.
  • evidence of actual confusion. None of Groupion's evidence "demonstrates instances of actual confusion by its customers regarding the source of its products."
  • likelihood of expansion. Groupon bought a mobile apps business, but the court says it will use that to distribute deals, not for intracompany groupware.
  • purchaser care. B2B software buyers are careful, as are advertisers.
Thus, the factors point against Groupion's likelihood of success, so the court denies the preliminary injunction, Groupion's motion for summary judgment and motion to cancel Groupion's registered mark. I assume Groupon will view this as an invitation to bring its own summary judgment motion and kill this case. The judge's tone was unmistakable.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: likelihood of confusion, trademark
Companies: groupion, groupon


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 12:43am

    Thus, the factors point against Groupion's likelihood of success, so the court denies the preliminary injunction, Groupion's motion for summary judgment and motion to cancel [Groupon's] registered mark.

    FTFY.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 10:56am

      Re:

      Hmmm, no confusion?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 6:33pm

        Re: Re:

        No confusion because I'm still able to deduce which name is correct by context.

        If there is confusion, I would not be able to detect this mistake.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 1:12am

    I'm surprised they haven't sued Google. If you type in "Groupion", it shows results for "Groupon" instead.
    I can't imagine that causing any sort of harm to their business (since anyone actually trying to do a search on them would click "Show results for Groupion instead"), but that didn't stop them in this case...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Richard (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 4:52am

    Question

    Would a morion in a hurry be confused?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:27am

    The present tense play-by-play style of writing makes me feel like I'm reading over shoulder of the judge as he types!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:30am

    The present tense play-by-play style of writing makes me feel like I'm reading over shoulder of the judge as he types!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    TtfnJohn (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 11:30am

    I can see some times when proof reading must be hell.

    This is one of them. ;-)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 10:05am

    3 Reads to get it down . . .

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.