The Engine Of Innovation Realizing It Can't Ignore DC Any More
from the kicking-the-slumbering-beast dept
Today marks the launch of an exciting new effort among the startup ecosystem: Engine Advocacy. If you're an entrepreneur, investor, innovator, creator or involved in the overall startup ecosystem, please check out the website and consider joining.As you may recall, a few months ago a few of us involved in the startup world started talking about how ridiculous it was that folks in Washington DC keep pushing ridiculously bad legislation that impacts innovation and competition in a really negative way -- without recognizing the damage this causes. The end result was that, in almost every instance, legislation that was going to impact the true engine of innovation and economic growth in this country was being crafted and implemented without hearing from those actually doing the innovation and creating the economic growth. This was most immediately seen in the mess created by PROTECT IP and SOPA, but involves a variety of other topics as well: immigration, broadband, privacy, patents and many other issues all impact how the startup ecosystem (including not just entrepreneurs, but inventors, innovators, investors, technologists, advisors and additional supporting players and infrastructure as well) can and does grow and contribute to the economy.
Traditionally, this crew has mostly ignored what's happening in Washington DC -- and for a good reason: they're busy innovating. Too often, it's the businesses that are trying to hold back competition and change that spend time in DC, while those who are actually changing things are much more focused on executing on their vision. That leads to bad legislation.
With the PIPA and SOPA fight blowing up so quickly, some of us worked together to put together an initial entrepreneur's letter signed by 135 entrepreneurs asking Congress not to approve PROTECT IP. Today, we're sending an updated version, which also covers SOPA, and is now signed by over 200 entrepreneurs, all concerned about the impact these bills would have on their ability to innovate. A similar effort was put together by some of the top venture capitalists around. Soon after that, some of the signers of both letters teamed up to go to Washington, DC and speak to Congress about the bill. Since then, we've helped others in the startup world go to DC as well.
Out of all of this came the idea to build this loose coalition of those involved in the startup world, which became Engine Advocacy. It's an exciting group of entrepreneurs, investors, advisors and others who are very involved in driving new innovation via startups. We want to make sure that the voice of the entrepreneur is being heard in Washington DC -- and that those in the startup ecosystem are aware of what's going on in DC. We have big things planned over the next few months, and if you're interested in being a part of this, we urge you to sign up on the website. Let's make sure that the engine of innovation, jobs and the economy is not stifled by politicians who simply aren't aware of what the consequences of their actions will be.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: engine of innovation, entrepreneurs, innovation, protect ip, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They are to the tech innovators what the record companies are to musicians. A way to get started but it costs you dearly in the long run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
Anyway, instead of "startup world", how about just starting on Step2? (I can't even write it without confusion, because it ends in question marks!) You've "worked" on this for ten years, ought to have SOME ideas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
Love the (mis)use of CAps! And the fake out of making us think this was going to be a question and then turning it into a statement at the last second with that period there. Nicely trolled!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
/Choose/ =your= BATTLES |idiot|
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
God that would be nice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/12500917012/riaa-doesnt-apologize-year-long-blog-cen sorship-just-stands-its-claim-that-site-broke-law.shtml
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moniker Mike is off to "startup world", eh?
10 WAIT FOR NEW TECHDIRT POST
20 WRITING RAMBLING DIATRIBE
30 ASK MOMMY FOR SNACK AND TAKE NAP
40 GOTO 10
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's funny...
...but I thought that, to be unaware of the consequences of one's actions was a prerequisite for being a politician.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I fear that with time even though it has an admirable initial purpose will morph into the same thing others has become and be part of the part of the problem, someday tech giants too can become obsolete, by others even more tech savvy and prepared and this group would be the roadblock to them.
But if that is what is needed today, what the heck welcome for the moment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DC = Dumb & Corrupt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
be modified, the very same thing that led people here to lob spiteful grenades at those who prepared a letter supporting one or more of the pending bills.
Talk about a double standard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Perhaps they don't want us to modify the letter because they are afraid that people will start criticizing IP more than what this letter does? Either way, this letter shouldn't be signed and we should focus our attention on a more relevant letter instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Its not a double stanard. Its a separate system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cite with substantiating data needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, e-bay, Google, etc, etc, etc, etc.
Think internet companies, venture capital, and angel investors. Realize that anyone of the companies I mentioned, can buy or shut down all the record labels and about half the move studios in the US and not break a sweat. Realize that the giant is awakening, and you only have your own stupidity to blame.
Now, for a simple message ... I told you so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This site criticizes data proffered by content creators as not withstanding scrutiny, so it seems to me that the linked site should likewise be suject to scrutiny by making it back up its proffered data.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Politicians respond to either money and/or votes
Ghostwriting the Law
To get the attention of politicians, you are likely going to either need to pay them, or you'll need to mobilize enough voters (people who actually show up to vote) to show politicians that they will be voted out of office if they don't do what you suggest. This could be a decades' long process, but if you want to create a more entrepreneurial culture in the US, it's good to get working on it now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just an FYI.
Sharon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
another biased article
Masnick and his monkeys have an unreported conflict of interest-
https://www.insightcommunity.com/cases.php?n=10&pg=1
They sell blog filler and "insights" to major corporations including MS, HP, IBM etc. who just happen to be some of the world’s most frequent patent suit defendants. Obviously, he has failed to report his conflicts as any reputable reporter would. But then Masnick and his monkeys are not reporters. They are patent system saboteurs receiving funding from huge corporate infringers. They cannot be trusted and have no credibility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DC Startup Culture
Also, what DC startups do you all think we're most instrumental in getting this law kicked out? I wrote a post about the recently at http://startupratings.com/5-hot-tech-startups-dc/, and am curious on everyone's thoughts. Feel free to let me know your thoughts (or burn me) if you feel it necessary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]