Hollywood Film Editor Gives Detailed Explanation For Why Hollywood Shouldn't Support SOPA/PIPA
from the nicely-done dept
Marta Evry, a successful freelance film editor who's worked on Castle, House and many other shows and movies -- and who is a member of the IATSE union, one of the unions supporting SOPA/PIPA -- has written a very thorough, very detailed, and totally worth reading explanation of why she cannot support SOPA/PIPA. It's quite well written and thought out. She points out that she is, clearly, directly impacted by piracy in that her living is made from working on content that is frequently infringed upon. She also demonstrates the potential limitations of existing law that SOPA/PIPA supporters insist are the problems that require such new bills. However, she then goes into great detail on the problems in the bills, and explains why she can't support them. Honestly, it may be the most thorough, convincing, and detailed takedown I've seen of the bills -- and from a Hollywood insider whose union supports the bills.How is this possible? Because the divide over SOPA/PIPA isn't political, it's between those who understand how the internet works and those who don't, those who see opportunities for growth and innovation and those who fear change and are holding on to old business models for dear life.Seriously. Just go read the whole thing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: film editor, hollywood, pipa, protect ip, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.deadline.com/2012/01/exclusive-hollywood-moguls-stopping-obama-donations-b ecause-of-administrations-piracy-stand/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is also why Obama has arranged a meeting, and fundraiser, with the Tech Industry, another Hollywood betrayal.
What is interesting is that the Tech Industry dwarfs the Hollywood based Entertainment Industry but these are people not used to lobbying. They shape the future through innovation and development where they usually prefer to keep the Government out of the loop.
However it seems the time has come that the Internet needs protection from the abuse of Hollywood. It would be most interesting if Obama changed paymasters provided the Tech Industry assembles a large enough pool.
The future without Hollywood trying to endlessly ram through new IP laws would be most interesting. Maybe even the Tech Industry can fix the many Copyright problems that already exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My mind exploded. The most insightful comment of the year has made the interwebz before January is over and it came from inside the MAFIAA?
*goes collect the pieces of neural tissue spread around*
Jokes apart, it's refreshing to see such great article. She earned +1000 internets today =D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
*Except for the usual non-lawyer mistake of using "probably cause" instead of "probable cause".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's more a battle between one way broadcast and interactive IP based communication. The old schools know how to dictate, the new school knows how to interact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Then again, she is right. It's not political, It's those who don't know the internet and how it works and those who don't and won't.
So sad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Clearly she is just one of the freetards, and I'm sure even now agents of her employers are scouring her computer(s) to see if she is the spy secretly downloading infringing content in an effort to sully their names.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I will be pointing SOPA/PIPA newbies to that article from now on when it is an easy detailed read.
I did spot a few minor things missing like this dreaded new law making linking unlawful. For example YouTube gets hit through the removal of safe harbour but FaceBook gets punished as well through letting their users link to YouTube and other media sharing sites.
These bills are so bad that they cannot be fixed and need to be killed outright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What will the shrolls say, I wonder?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What will the shrolls say, I wonder?
1. Attack her for not being famous enough for her opinion to be valid.
2. Claim she hasn't read the bill and so doesn't understand it / has been brainwashed by those of us daring to have a different interpretation.
3. Attack Mike for posting another SOPA article.
Let's see where they go...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What will the shrolls say, I wonder?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My grade for the article: Clearly an A+ for effort, but at best a D for substantive content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Too much for you, Lamy? DOn't worry, I think Wikipedia's ended its blackout so you can do some proper research. Perish the thought ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Anyway, nice pick, #2 is the one that requires the least effort and thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Would be interesting to get HER view of our resident trolls and the garbage they spew.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
www.righthaven.com
:-)
Good for a chuckle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: www.righthaven.com
I was worried for a while there when I feared that the IP protection industry may have got it.
We can now look forwards to a full site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: www.righthaven.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Infographic: Why the movie industry is so wrong about SOPA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Infographic: Why the movie industry is so wrong about SOPA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Excellent post, Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clueless
http://gizmodo.com/5877143/riaa-reminds-us-why-we-hate-them-with-obnoxious-smarta ss-tweet?tag=sopa
Love the line from Gizmodo:
...If you want to convince the public (you know, those people you like to sue) that you aren't a bunch of assholes, maybe try a different tack. Or, if you're going to be a dick, maybe be a dick who can spell?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Safe harbor?
Therefore she's kind of missing the point about what's so bad with SOPA/PIPA. They don't really change the landscape that much for infringers, but they change it drastically for ISPs and others who currently have DMCA safe harbor protection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Safe harbor?
Unless you are a politician. Or the RIAA/MPAA. Or a Big Content Rights Holder. Then you can remove and go "my bad, sorry" and sweep it all under the rug like a big giant "redo" without any repercussions. Do this as an individual sharing 8 songs however, and you get sued out of existence in the harshest manner possible with the full weight of the judicial system pushed squarely down on top of you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Safe harbor?
I wrote the article in question.
Just a quick response - I originally posted this article on my own blog, so I was referring to how DMCA's "safe harbor" works for me as the owner of a site, not a user uploading a clip to YouTube or another site I didn't own the domaine name for. My understanding is I would be covered under those circumstances. However, if I am mistaken about this, I'm willing to correct the record. Any information you may have would be appreciated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8
The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.
Can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]