Ireland Signs Controversial 'Irish SOPA' Into Law; Kicks Off New Censorship Regime

from the block-block-block dept

Remember how EMI sued the Irish government for failing to pass a SOPA-like law that will force ISPs to act as copyright cops and censor and block access to websites that the entertainment industry doesn't like? Well, apparently, the end result is that the Irish government has now signed the bill into law. This happened despite widespread protests in Ireland against the bill.

The Irish Minister for Research and Innovation, Sean Sherlock, is insisting that the final version of the bill is much more limited than earlier proposals, and that it took guidance from recent EU Court of Justice rulings that say ISPs shouldn't have to be proactive about blocking. That still means that copyright holders can petition to force ISPs to block all access to various websites, and as we've seen in other countries in Europe, you can bet that the major record labels and studios will be doing just that very soon (if they haven't already) -- though their track record on properly calling out infringement isn't very good.

Sherlock, apparently realizing just how bad this looks to the citizenry, is trying to balance this announcement out by also saying that he's launching the "next stage" of the process to review copyright in Ireland, with the goal of "removing barriers to innovation." This is an ongoing process that we first wrote about last year, when the country realized that existing copyright law was holding back innovation.

Of course, the end result is that the government appears to be trying to move in two different directions at once. On the one hand, it's catering to the legacy entertainment industry interests and hindering the internet as the platform that enables new business models... while at the same time paying lip service to how it has to increase such innovation. Here's a tip: the first thing towards increasing innovation in business models online is not putting misplaced liability on service providers, not setting up a censorship regime, and not removing the incentives for the entertainment industry to actually embrace innovative business models.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blocking, copyright, free speech, ireland, isps, sopa


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Arthur (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:34pm

    Typical legislation sequence

    1. Pass draconian law to censor the Internet.
    2. Promise to study what to do about the Internet.
    3. If any studies happen to get done, ignore.
    4. Repeat.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Zos (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:40pm

      Re: Typical legislation sequence

      it worked so well with drugs, why change?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        hfh, 1 Mar 2012 @ 4:07am

        Re: Re: Typical legislation sequence

        I do hope you're joking right?

        Drug prohibiton is THE biggest mistake of the last century, it doesnt work, and never will.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PlagueSD (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:48pm

      Re: Typical legislation sequence

      You're doing it wrong. The correct internet meme is:

      1. Pass draconian law to censor the Internet.
      2. Promise to study what to do about the Internet.
      3. ...
      4. profit!!!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 6:28am

        Re: Re: Typical legislation sequence

        Wrong order mate.

        1. Profit
        2. Pass draconian law to censor the Internet
        3. Promise to study what to do about the Internet
        4. ???

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:40pm

    Paul MacGuiness must be off congratulating himself right now. And I would imagine the process is just as dirty as I think it sounds.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bob, 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:59pm

    Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

    You said so yourself. We've tried 10+ years of giving our stuff away for free and waiting for first the advertisers and then the tip jars to pay off. So far only Big Search has gotten rich off the content.

    The fact is that giving stuff away and letting someone else make money off of it is now the old business model. The real place we need innovation is finding an acceptable paywall that helps the artist afford health insurance while keeping the patrons happy enough to pay.

    That where we need innovation and that's why you celebrated it when Louis CK and Kevin Smith did it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Alex Austin (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:04pm

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      And, this has what to do with the price of tea in China?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Gwiz (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:11pm

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      ...that helps the artist afford health insurance...

      Tell you what bob, I'll start giving a shit about that when I can afford decent health insurance for myself, ok?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Torg (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:21pm

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      "The fact is that giving stuff away and letting someone else make money off of it is now the old business model."

      Exactly! That's why we're trying to popularize new business models that help the artist prosper instead of the record labels. You've finally got it, bob!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 9:37pm

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      It's funny how you don't even know what a "paywall" is.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 9:44pm

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      I hope you don't mean you want every artist to be able to afford health insurance. Bad artists don't have a right to make money if no one wants their shit. Just like most people can't afford real health insurance if they create a start up that fails. Artists aren't taking any bigger risk (and possibly a lesser risk), and deserve no more protection than others.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 1:38am

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      Who is this Big Search? All I can find when I Google it is "Matt Popieluch: Best known as the singer and co-songwriter of Foreign Born". Why does he make so much money as an artist and the others don't? Maybe they're doing something wrong? By the way, are you allowed to use his name all the time? Doesn't he mind?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      The Groove Tiger (profile), 1 Mar 2012 @ 6:35am

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      Health insurance is the Ultimate Paywall.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Alastair McKinstry, 1 Mar 2012 @ 11:44am

      Re: Putting up a paywall is an innovative business model

      Nope, we tried the paywall route first. That didn't work, as people wouldn't pay, but would get free content elsewhere, even if not as good; it didn't matter.

      Eg. the Irish Times : originally all paywall, then free, as otherwise there was no money, now just small money from advertising.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    awbMaven (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:17pm

    Typically "Irish" from an English p.o.v.

    So, you pass a crap law and then promise to go about changing other laws to make it less crap.

    Arse-about-tit imv, a bit like ACTA in the EU being discussed again tomorrow: http://wp.me/p1jRDO-5T

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Rikuo (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:21pm

    I'm Irish, living in Dublin, and apart from Techdirt, I haven't heard ANYTHING at all about this, not in any of the newspapers (can't say anything about TV, as I don't watch TV, or listen to the radio).

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      blert, 29 Feb 2012 @ 6:20pm

      Re:

      You might not have noticed the tiny boxes with "articles" in them most of the mainstream press gave this coverage by. Or maybe you missed RTEs 20 debate on primetime.

      Online media such as the thejournal.ie gave it exstensive coverage. You the coverage that over 80,000 people signing a petition against deserves.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Atkray (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 6:36pm

      Re:

      Well there you go freetardo, if you weren't so busy pirating all your content you would have time to watch the tv programming that has been so thoughtfully provided for you and then you would have know about and understood this just like bob up there.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:25pm

    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
    A MOVIE REMAKE THAT NOBODY ASKED FOR IS INNOVATION

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Torg (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 5:29pm

      Re:

      PROTESTS ARE BLACKMAIL
      FREE SERVICES ARE BAD FOR THE CUSTOMER
      MONEY IS SPEECH

      Hey, this is pretty easy.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Another Anonymous, 1 Mar 2012 @ 11:59am

        Re: Re:

        DISARMAMENT IS SAFETY
        GOVERNMENTS ARE GOOD
        CELEBRITIES ARE EXCELLENT ROLE MODELS

        Am I doing it right?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Andrew F (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 6:41pm

    Does this affect search engines. If I recall correctly, Google has a rather large presence corporate in Ireland, so it'd be interesting to see how they react.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 6:41pm

    It is irony that someone named Sherlock doesn't have a clue right?
    I get confused sometimes....

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:32pm

    Nice to see that we now have a real-life example as to whether such measures "break the internet". There will be a lot of interested parties watching this one.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:47pm

      Re:

      Assuming of course they are willing to stop what they are doing and see the results.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 4:56am

        Re: Re:

        People will probably figure it out when they wake up one day and their internet doesn't work. Here's betting it doesn't happen and all of the inflammatory Chicken Little rhetoric is revealed as bullshit.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 6:37am

          Re: Re: Re:

          The internet will still work but if all goes according to plan it will just turn into TV version 2.0

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 8:11pm

    The liability has to end up somewhere. Your solutions all seem to be that nobody is responsible for anything, even their own actions and those of the people using their services. So who else is actually responsible?

    The internet is broken, BTW... Ireland is just trying to fix it a bit.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dave, 29 Feb 2012 @ 8:27pm

      Re:

      "The internet is broken..."

      In what regard? Please explain the way in which the "internet" is broken.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 6:40am

      Re:

      If by broken you mean: works as intended to connect the world and allow individuals to share and transmit information, and by fix you mean: give greater control to large companies and make any interface that allows user generated content to be too great of a liability to own. Then you are correct.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed Campion, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:36am

      Re:

      You cannot get the genie back in the bottle. For better, or worse the old media business models are dead. The only viable model for media companies is the Netflix one. (Low monthly fee, for all you can eat).

      Media companies can whine all they like about CD sales not being what they were, tell it to the horse, and buggy manufacturers. Hobbling the internet, so that you don't have to change your business model is state socialism for the wealthy.

      There is a tiny chance that a hypothetical government could devise a positive piece of legislation for the internet. Neither this, not SOPA are that piece of legislation. In fact, they are actively harmful to the consumer, and in the long term to the rights holders.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 8:20pm

    Vote them out of office!

    Is it too much to hope that, come next elections, the Irish public will vote out the assholes who passed this law despite widespread opposition?

    The easiest prey is that which does not fight back.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Zem, 29 Feb 2012 @ 9:20pm

    Lol Ireland

    Looks like the Irish experiment of self rule and nationhood is over after less than 100 years. GOGO Ireland.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed Campion, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:45am

      Re: Lol Ireland

      You're trolling,I'll bite anyway. We are currently in the fifth french republic. Sure, the first Irish Republic (1948-2011) is over.
      Of course you appear to value glibness over actually knowing anything.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 11:56pm

    One step forward, two steps back

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Claire Ryan (profile), 1 Mar 2012 @ 1:19am

    I wish I could feel surprised at this, but no. I'm not.

    Ireland is run by a large number of career politicians:

    - some of whom effectively inherited their positions from their parents
    - many of whom have no actual skills other than being personable
    - with little to no concept of how the Internet works
    - in an environment where corruption is rampant, excessive, and largely unpunished
    - and surrounded by businesspeople who have a habit of seeing the government as a tool to be used to increase their profits.

    Of course it was passed. Cronyism alone would ensure that. If the Irish government are not going to listen to the people when it comes to something like bailing out the defunct banking system - after it was run off a cliff by rich bankers with ties to the major political parties - then they will not listen now.

    The chunk of Ireland that votes is largely the older population who view technology with deep suspicion. The major political parties are a choice between the deeply corrupt, the ineffectual and incompetent, and the so-small-they're-powerless. And the younger, college-educated generation (most of us, we can get close-to-free third level degrees) between 20 and 30 years old are emigrating in their thousands, in keeping with the long tradition of the Irish saying 'fuck this' and getting out of the country when faced with economic disaster.

    In short: the only thing that'll have an effect on this is if the major tech companies (who base their European HQs in Ireland to take advantage of the ridiculously low corporate tax rate) start kicking up a fuss or bribing the right people. Nothing in Irish politics matters except money, and if they threaten to take all their money and leave for someplace less obviously crazy, the law will be struck down so fast your head will spin. But nothing - NOTHING - the actual populace can do will make a difference.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 2:10am

      Re:

      "- many of whom have no actual skills other than being personable
      - with little to no concept of how the Internet works
      - in an environment where corruption is rampant, excessive, and largely unpunished
      - and surrounded by businesspeople who have a habit of seeing the government as a tool to be used to increase their profits."

      You just described a large part of the politicians world-wide :)

      (but interesting post)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 1:48am

    @awbmaven

    just read from the link posted. wow! Karel De Gucht is so full of BS it's unbelievable! wonder how long it took and what incentives he received to make him such a lying arse hole? the conversation later will be very interesting. i hope that gets posted.

    as for Ireland, they obviously didn't have the balls to stand up against EMI. how can a country sell out it's people like that? will be interesting when the EU decides whether it ACTA is legal or not if Ireland has to change things.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 3:03am

      Re:

      "how can a country sell out it's people like that?"

      You don't know the half of it! Being forced as citizens to repay bank debts etc.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    lux hibernia, 1 Mar 2012 @ 5:44am

    Fallout from which will only hurt others

    The media companies know that legislation like this will have no effect on illegal downloads. They are trying to set precedents and create an atmosphere that will allow them to take more steps towards monopolising content and destroying the public domain.

    The unintended consequences of this will be to hurt small content creators, innovators and business owners. When I say 'unintended' I mean by the legislators. The media companies couldn't care less about what happens to artists.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2012 @ 8:54am

      Re: Fallout from which will only hurt others

      No one wants to destroy the public domain, you buttfag

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Ed Campion, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:57am

        Re: Re: Fallout from which will only hurt others

        Thank you for your erudite, and valuable contribution. Please understand that open ended legislation compiled by non-experts will have consequences in areas that they were never supposed to.This is the chief problem with SOPA, and this Irish piece of legislation.

        The other is that the old business models are dead, hobbling the internet so that big media dosen't have to change its business models, is socialism for the wealthy.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    TDR, 1 Mar 2012 @ 6:12am

    I guess the luck of the Irish isn't going to be so good this St. Patty's day...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2012 @ 8:15am

    That means the money now goes to VPN services.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Richard Bennett (profile), 1 Mar 2012 @ 11:56am

    Innovative New Business Models

    The Internet's business model for content seems to involve giving your work away for free and buying lottery tickets with the artist's earnings from Starbucks.

    I don't think that's going to work.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed Campion, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:48am

      Re: Innovative New Business Models

      You cannot get the genie back in the bottle. For better, or worse the old media business models are dead. The only viable model for media companies is the Netflix one. (Low monthly fee, for all you can eat).

      Media companies can whine all they like about CD sales not being what they were, tell it to the horse, and buggy manufacturers. Hobbling the internet, so that you don't have to change your business model is state socialism for the wealthy.

      There is a tiny chance that a hypothetical government could devise a positive piece of legislation for the internet. Neither this, not SOPA are that piece of legislation. In fact, they are actively harmful to the consumer, and in the long term to the rights holders.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dave, 1 Mar 2012 @ 2:55pm

    Sell-out

    I have to say that the Irish aren't exactly renowned for being the brightest bulbs in the box and this little incident seems to confirm that their politicians are certainly in the low-wattage category. There will be tears, mark my words. They will find that this is a very hot potato and will do nothing to stamp out piracy.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Claire Ryan, 1 Mar 2012 @ 5:02pm

      Re: Sell-out

      ...You're kidding me. I posted a rather long comment on why this is largely about corruption, and all you got is hurr durr dem Oirish be stoopid?

      Your ignorance is showing.

      (FYI, it's not called the Land of Saints and Scholars for nothing. How about you do the research before you decide to open your mouth next time?)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Liam M, 3 Mar 2012 @ 6:49am

      Re: Sell-out

      You're crossing the line there, Dave. Our systems are the legacy of archaic imperial systems not suited to Irish culture, which were adopted out of practical necessity in trying to put together a sovereign nation. I for one am confident these will ultimately balance out. The 'brightest bulbs in the box' notion is from another legacy - one of historical spin-doctoring.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rob, 1 Mar 2012 @ 5:27pm

    what a load of horseshit..send this ejit an email to complain and would the last person to leave Ireland please turn off the broadband
    http://www.labour.ie/seansherlock

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2012 @ 8:21am

    Does this mean no more internet commercials?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.