Size Matters: Why The TSA Fears Thirteen-Inch Laptops, But Not Eleven-Inch Ones

from the makes-no-sense dept

Fri, Apr 6th 2012 8:28am — Mike Masnick

I used to travel with both a laptop and a netbook. More recently, I've usually traveled with a laptop and a tablet. I always took both the laptop and netbook out when I went through airport security, assuming that was required. Also, remembering reports that were written when the iPad first came out, I also take my tablet out and dutifully place it in a separate bin. The last time I went through the airport, a TSA agent told me (for the first time) that I don't actually need to take out the tablet, but she still thanked me for doing so. I may continue to do so, just to avoid any further hassle, but it turns out that the rules for what devices you need to take out, and what you don't, are ridiculously opaque. And, in fact, I probably never had to take out that netbook in the first place, though I wouldn't have put it past the TSA agents to force me to do so anyway if I hadn't.

Matt Richtel, at the NY Times, tries to get to the bottom of the weird rules for what devices come out and which don't and mostly comes up empty. He got curious after a similar experience, in which he was told his iPad could stay in his bag. The TSA insisted it had its reasons, but wouldn't tell him. Other security experts had some guesses, but no solid reasons. Then, there's the TSA's famous Blogger Bob. Oddly, Richtel and the NY Times apparently don't know how to do this amazingly cool HTML trick of "linking" (guys, it's 2012, get with the program), but Richtel quotes two TSA Blogger Bob posts, which I will link to here, finding them myself using another modern digital tool: the search engine. The first one says that smaller devices can stay in your bag:

Electronic items smaller than the standard sized laptop should not need to be removed from your bag or their cases. It’s that simple.

It’s important to remember, however, that our officers are trained to look for anomalies to help keep air travel safe, and if something needs a closer look, it will receive secondary screening. The key to avoiding bag searches is keeping the clutter down. The less clutter you have in your bag, the less likely it will be searched.

Only electronics the size of a standard laptop or larger (for example Playstation®, Xbox®, or Nintendo®), full-size DVD players, and video cameras that use video cassettes must be removed from their carrying cases and submitted separately for x-ray screening. Removing larger electronics helps us get a better look at them and also allows us to get a better look at the contents of your bag

That explains the what, but not the why. It also, once again, makes me think that it's often a safer bet to just remove, rather than give the TSA any reason to delay you. The second post is slightly more bizarre, in that it seems to suggest that there's a screen-size cutoff:

So with those rules in mind, the 11” model of the MacBook Air is fine to leave in your bag, and the 13” model must be removed prior to X-ray screening. Unless of course you own one of the "Checkpoint friendly" laptop bags... Keep in mind that even though you’ve done everything right, our officers are trained to look for anomalies and the need may arise to take a closer look at your gadget.

I hope this clears things up.

Got it? 11" screens? Leave 'em in your bag. 13"? Take 'em out. 12"? Well, are you feeling lucky?

I am curious, however, how many people actually have tried to go through TSA security with an 11" or smaller screen on a computer... and made it through without having to pull the device out of your bag. I can't imagine that most average TSA agents know this amazing 12" rule.

Either way, Richtel tries to parse the language to figure out why there's a screen size cutoff, and still comes up empty. Finally, he talks to an anonymous "security expert," who actually worked on "related issues with the Department of Homeland Security." That guy admitted what we all pretty much suspected all along:

He said that the laptop rule is about appearances, giving people a sense that something is being done to protect them. “Security theater,” he called it.

Richtel makes it sound like "security theater" is a new term, which it's not. But, either way, it's nice to get confirmation, yet again, that the whole thing is a joke. But, in the end, it doesn't matter, because rather than deal with security delaying you from catching your flight, it's still probably going to be easier to take everything out and put them all in individual bins.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blogger bob, laptop, security, tsa

63 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

WysiWyg (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:43am

Bombs?
I have always been of the impression that the point of checking your laptop is to make sure it's not a bomb?

Then I guess it could make some sense to have a size limit, since you probably can't make a decent size bomb that fits in say a cellphone (I don't honestly know that much about bombmaking).

Then again, the 13" rule seems very arbitrary.

Also, wasn't there talk about them making copies of harddrives to check for copyright infringement? Or was I dreaming that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:46am
  
  Re: Bombs?
  Well following their other rules I can make a bomb big enough to blow a hole in the plane with just 3.1 ounces of liquid. I could fir 3 ounces of liquid into a cellphone or a netbook.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:47am
    
    Re: Re: Bombs?
    And yes you could easily blow a hole in a plane with a bomb the size of a cellphone.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bosconet (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:56am
  
  Re: Bombs?
  But your laptop is a bomb. Short out that lithium ion battery and BOOM!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Atkray (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:21am
  
  Re: Bombs?
  Checking hard drives is the border patrol. They have not merged with TSA yet so it's a separate set of goons going through your belongings. Since it is all under the "homeland security" umbrella this oversight should be corrected soon.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chosen Reject (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:22am
  
  Re: Bombs?
  The sign I saw recently mentioned that they want you to take the laptop out so they can see if the electronics have been tampered with. I'm not entirely wise to the hiring guidelines of TSA agents, but my guess is very few of them would have any clue about whether some electronics have been tampered with beyond something entirely obvious, like the all electronics being gutted out.
  
  Hmmm... makes me we want to get an old laptop, gut it out and then go through just to see what they do.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:02am
    
    Re: Re: Bombs?
    you gotta go weirder than that just incase they do notice. Fill it with bailing wire and hard candies or something.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Machin Shin (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 1:08pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Bombs?
      Most fun would be getting your hands on some of the dye packs to put in there.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jake, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:34am
  
  Re: Bombs?
  Back in the days when my father had to make semi-frequent business trips to Northern Ireland, the rationale was that you could strip out the inside of a laptop and hide a handgun in it, so he was required to prove that it was capable of booting up; the late-90s IBM ThinkPads had a metal baseplate as a heatsink instead of using a fan, which would interfere with the X-Ray scanner.
  
  Of course, back in those days they didn't also go through your laptop's hard drive without probable cause or a warrant, or throw you in jail for having "materials likely to be useful to a terrorist" on it. And this I might add was at a time when we had the army running honest-to-whoever counter-insurgency operations within our own sovereign territory.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- elif, 7 Apr 2012 @ 12:36pm
  
  Re: Bombs?
  Actually cell phone bombs can be extremely powerful. Mossad in particular are quite fond of them for assassinations.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Abdullah P. Wasserman, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:45am

Passengers still have fists and feet and can spit.
Why aren't passengers bound, gagged, water-boarded and beaten unconscious before they travel on planes?

You say it gives the TSA/CIA/FBI/USA/SOB/FOD/XYZ/AAA...ZZZ/000...999 room to maneuver for bigger budgets?

But (Gard bless) 'merica is broke-assed and trillions of bux in debt.

Oh, never mind.

Why does the Soviet Onion seem kind of easy-going these days?

---

Aren't you better off today? Vote Democrat or Republican in 2012! America needs more of the same old shit!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:59am
  
  Re: Passengers still have fists and feet and can spit.
  I'm voting for Goldman Sachs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 4:49pm
    
    Re: Re: Passengers still have fists and feet and can spit.
    That doesn't really narrow it down to one party these days.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:54am

Wait, you pander to the TSA?
"safer bet to just remove, rather than give the TSA any reason to delay you."

I give them plenty of reasons to delay me. Honestly, they seem rather annoyed every time I show up at the TSA checkpoint with my bag full of Nerf blasters... and then refuse the body scan opting instead for the patdown.

I also often neglect to remove my liquids from my bag (although, they're generally in a quart bag).

Ultimately, a trip through TSA checkpoint for me takes at least 10-15 mins, and that doesn't include waiting in line. They seem genuinely annoyed, and I've noticed they're starting to preemptively push me through the metal detector instead of the body scanner - and I'm getting less fuss over my Nerf blasters recently.

FWIW, I fly the same trip at least twice a month... and you can hate me for being that guy who slows everything down >:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chosen Reject (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:30am
  
  Re: Wait, you pander to the TSA?
  I also refuse the body scan in favor of the pat down. I figure if they want to make my life miserable, I'll make someone else's life miserable as well. However, I'm pretty sure that the pat down would be the easiest way to smuggle knives aboard. I had my id in the middle of my folded up boarding pass in my cargo pants pocket during the pat down. The guy didn't say anything about it. A razor blade could have easily been in the same space without adding a significant amount of space to have made it any more suspicious then it already was.
  
  I've long since given up the idea that the TSA does anything to make me safer, but after my last experience (I don't fly often) I think we're less safe now than we were 11 years ago. At least from the perspective of what gets on the plane. The only two things that needed to happen to prevent another 9/11 were done long ago: 1) Keep passengers from the cockpit, and 2) make passengers not accept a hijacking. Number one happened shortly after 9/11, and number two happened before United flight 93 got to its target.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Eileen (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:41am
    
    Re: Re: Wait, you pander to the TSA?
    Yes, the two points you mention have been repeatedly made, and at this point an airport or plane is in no more danger (arguably less) than any other collection of 100 - 300 individuals you might find anywhere.
    
    There's money to be made in security theater though!
    
    At this point, the troubling thing is that they're not even trying to claim this will prevent another 9/11. So by extension, any group of 100 - 300 people is open for TSA treatment: bus terminals, trains, stadiums, etc. Welcome to the police state. I put the over/under of looking like Brazil (the movie) at 2020.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aaron, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:56am

11" - no hassles
I travel relatively frequently and have done so for several months with an 11" MacBook Air. Despite seeing many varieties of TSA incompetence, I have never been asked to remove it from my backpack.

I often travel with the 11" MacBook Air in the same pouch as an iPad - which causes long, quizzical gazes into the X-ray machine, but it hasn't been a source of questioning or trouble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Sean T Henry (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 1:43pm
  
  Re: 11" - no hassles
  Stack your Ipod and Iphone on top of that with a hardback copy of 1984 where you scratch the words "instructions for peace" under the title.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
palma wurzel, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:57am

confusing
i recently traveled w/ a dell laptop, macbook & ipad. piled all 3 in a tray. they made me put the ipad away & put the laptops in separate trays. then they laughed at me, presumably for being a nerd. although truth be told, i found it somewhat amusing too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- New Mexico Mark, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:49am
  
  Re: confusing
  Good thing they didn't catch on that you were actually smuggling electronics.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 8:57am

they probably think that if the device has a smaller screen, there cant be as much info on it - visible, anyway! you know what they say-out of sight, out of mind!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Richard (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:06am

Norway
Travelling from Heathrow to Oslo I have noticed that on the way out (UK) security demands that you remove laptops from the bag - whilst on the way back (Norway) security demands that you don't remove your laptop from the bag.

Personally I suspect that the Norwegians have thought this through better than everyone else has...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:16am
  
  Re: Norway
  People's laptops are gross disease carrying nightmares. The Norwegians probably just want you to keep your 3 year old germ culture out of their breathing air. :b
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Darryl, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:28am

I think the actual rule is if you have taken it out of your bag you will be told you don't have to do that. If you have left it in your bag you will be told to take it out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:01am
  
  Re:
  Darryl ?!?! is that really you? The post was amusing, not an attack, relevant and there was not a double space between sentences. Either your meds are getting better or this is a different Darryl.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - [citation needed or GTFO], 6 Apr 2012 @ 12:08pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I'd say different. This one actually used a capital D. :)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obedience, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:28am

Obey
Actually, the more absurd the rules, the better. Because the intention is to make you get used to obeying without asking why.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TtfnJohn (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:37am

So much of what passes for airport (and cruise ship) security is "theatre". X-Rays and scanners ought only to confirm what a well trained agent should notice anyway, that there's something not right about the passenger that goes beyond a nervous flyer. Things like unable to make eye contact, a high level of anxiety and a number of other signs that there's something wrong with this person.

The size of a screen on laptop or pad computer don't enter into it. Yes, it's possible that you can pack an explosive in a laptop or iPad though only by making them essentially useless. In most cases there would also be some evidence of wide spread tampering which someone would need to do to remove the motherboard and pack in explosives such as broken seals.

Mostly, though, it's just for show. A well trained and well informed terrorist such as the ones who struck on 9/11 will know, in detail, about security measures and the best ways of circumventing them. As did a group of Sikh separatists based in Canada who didn't even board the planes. The bombs, with timers, went on as luggage and then the terrorists simply didn't bother to get on the flights.

Nothing is 100% but TSA isn't concerned with that as much as they're concerned with the theatre around boarding a plane which will convince people that it is 100%. Until, heaven forbid, the next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beefcake (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:44am

Shoes at the Airport
By that logic, there should be a shoe-size threshold as well. Proposal: US Mens size 10 or smaller, you're free to keep your foot odor to yourself (provided the blueshirts don't detect any anomalies such as a loose heel or an unfamiliar knot). Size 10 or greater, remove your shoes for screening. While the rule only applies to Men's sizes, profiling is wrong so if you have a women's size 10 or higher you may also be asked to remove your shoes for screening.

If your footwear is European sized, no matter what the size you must remove them for screening because you've clearly done business or traveled abroad and therefore are subject to enhanced screening. Once screened, said footwear will be turned over to ICE at the International Terminal to ensure it isn't counterfeit or infringing on a copyright. If it is, you will be subject to rendition to a secret holding cell at Disney headquarters. But if you're cleared after all this, you are free to continue to your gate where you'll have an unobstructed view of your plane taking off without you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:53am
  
  Re: Shoes at the Airport
  Well, theoretically, there is a shoe size limit (or rather, a shoe-wearer age limit).
  
  Anyone 12 or younger can keep their shoes on now. How they came to that conclusion, I don't know.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sean T Henry (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 1:50pm
    
    Re: Re: Shoes at the Airport
    Well they figured that age out by finding the mean age that kids in the US learn to tie shoes.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
silverscarcat (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:45am

12" is the average huh?
Must be hard for porn stars to get through TSA security then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
William C Bonner, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:54am

I've been carrying "Subnotebooks" all along.
The screen on my current laptop (an HP dm1z) is the largest notebook screen I've had since before the TSA came into existence. It's got an 11.6" screen.

Are you saying that the smaller laptops that I've been carrying for the past decade I should have been able to leave in my bag all this time?

I used to hate carrying electronic components through customs because I had to explain tech stuff to non technical people. I've always just treated my laptop like the next guys laptop when his was a 17" screen. Mine just doesn't rip my arm out of its socket.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael (profile), 7 Apr 2012 @ 12:06pm
  
  Re: I've been carrying "Subnotebooks" all along.
  What did you have to explain to them about your notebooks?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
joe, 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:15am

o say does that star spangled banner yet wave
o'er the land of the inane
and the home of the ... secure?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bastiat's Ghost, 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:43am

A device of any size or function
A device of any size or function can be broken down into components small enough to make it through airport security and then be re-assembled pre-flight. The most unobtrusive way to do this is to have multiple people carry 1 component each inside of various objects or body cavities. These components are handed off to a single person in the bathrooms or any other area with inadequate security coverage. The device that is being built up could even be handed off to several people over several days depending on the desire for obfuscation and the size and complexity of the device.

In short, there is no method to prevent the construction of a bomb, knife, or zip-gun short of stripping everyone completely naked and having them go through full body X-Ray or MRI scans. Even those measures will prove inadequate once cybernetic prosthesis and genetic engineering become commonplace. It is not difficult to imagine that someone could have their bone marrow in some of their bones replaced with high explosives with a biological trigger, even with today's technology.

If you want to be safe, try not to piss off the rest of the world. And hope that fortune smiles upon you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
zbeast, 6 Apr 2012 @ 10:44am

Ya,, I carry a scarry bag.
I carry one bag that always phreakes them out.
it's my digital art bag.. The bag is about 2 inches
thicker than a standard laptop baq
but it has a lot in it..
2 spare battery's, 4 charger. 2 digital wacom pens.
one Wacom tablet, macbook pro, scanner, drawing pad (paper).
portable light table. The bag is heavy and has branded cable shoulder strap with pull out back pack straps.
icom radio and it's cables and controller.

Because of the heaviness and the high density metals it always gets searched.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael (profile), 7 Apr 2012 @ 12:07pm
  
  Re: Ya,, I carry a scarry bag.
  Artists are the greatest threat to national security, after all.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve R. (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 2:32pm

What About the Luggage with Wheels and Extendable Rods?
Another insane rule. Seems that a lot of luggage with the wheels and extendable metal rods could be designed to be easily broken down and re-configured into a weapon. So why are they allowed and scissors aren't?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ryan Diederich, 6 Apr 2012 @ 3:04pm

Simple as THIS
When on a cruise I found out that the contents of handheld bags were x-rayed on their way back on to the ship. With a simple thing called common sense, I put a personal knife in with my camera. No one ever bothered me, and I felt quite safe traveling around the islands that we stopped on.

After that I knew how to pack my bags so that they would never be screened, simply allow a low enough density of objects such that an X-Ray could pass through them.

If they posted instructions such as this in a widespread manner, then the process of screening would go much faster.

Also, they let my small bottle of lens cleaner on the plane, but my AA batteries had to be screened separately
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jameslee, 6 Apr 2012 @ 3:50pm

odd rules but TSA is odd
ha this is really odd. makes you really wounder what the real point of TSA is. we know the real point of the EPA is to protect companies not the public.

TSA has to go!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 3:59pm

believe it's due to the mechanical system of the DVD drive. ipad/ipods and smaller laptops do not have a mechanical drive system....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Security theater coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 4:29pm

Netbook and iPad no issues
I've probably put my 10" netbook through the checkpoints a dozen times without having to pull it out. iPad probably 4 times, no issues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mega1987 (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 5:00pm

IMO...
I think they don't like the number 13... It's bad luck for them.

hehehehehehe....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 6:26pm

I think one of the problems with airport security is that the rules are not really evidence based on anything. They're based on the unsubstantiated opinion and intuition of some random bureaucrat (committee) that probably knows very little about physics, chemistry, weapons, explosives, terrorists, etc... and just goes on his own subjective intuition and arbitrary conjectures and feelings on the matter at the time he wrote the policies.

It's like when they stopped that guy with the cup cake. Were there any objective criteria for doing so? No, but it was some random person's gut feeling that he should, some random TSA agent who probably knows little about chemistry, biology - potential bio hazards, weapons, bombs, etc... He was just basing it arbitrarily on what he felt comfortable with allowing on the airplane at the time.

and I think this is a problem with airport security in general. Little of it is based on objective criteria over what constitutes a dangerous item and more of it is based on spur of the moment feelings and comfort zones by whoever happens to be there at the time. The policies are not evidence based, they're faith and comfort based at the time that they were written.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 6:29pm
  
  Re:
  Oh, and here is a more recent example of TSA overreaction that hasn't made it on Techdirt (at least not yet).
  
  http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/04/03/1912241/tsa-shuts-down-airport-detains-11-after -science-project-found
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 6:30pm
  
  Re:
  Oh, and here is a more recent example of TSA a overreaction that hasn't made it on Techdirt (at least not yet).
  
  http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/04/03/1912241/tsa-shuts-down-airport-detains-11-after -science-project-found
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:01pm
  
  Re:
  whomever *
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Drew (profile), 6 Apr 2012 @ 9:00pm

I guess the thought of Mandingo sized anything will scare any woman.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Agent Phoenix, 7 Apr 2012 @ 3:06am

I have a 10" Asus netbook and I've tried to go through screening without taking it out. Security has always made me take it out of my bag AND its sleeve. Stupidly annoying. I also keep my bags very organized. I think there's too much inconsistency in air travel. Some places make you take your shoes off; some make you take off every outer jacket layer of clothing.
They say inconsistency is the mark of the true mad man. Airport security is as mad as it gets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CT2Mike, 7 Apr 2012 @ 5:43am

Inconcistency in TSA Handling
Face it, EVERY bit of the screening, from beginning to end, is meaningless to the point of MISDIRECTION.
It is ALL security Theater. ALL.
As a point of fact, the weapons used by the 9/11 terrorists DID NOT GET CARRIED ABOARD BY THEM.
They were placed there by EMPLOYEES. Hmm
People that work around the equipment.
People we trust to do their job right
People that we expect to use Judgement in determining what is and is not Safe.

I trust TSA like they trust me. NOT AT ALL.
But I recognize what they are, and what they represent.
The Gestapo was created to ensure internal security was maintained and kept secure.

I do NOT fly, and WILL NOT. Not because I fear Terrorists; because I fear Tyrants.
I chose NOT to give up my rights, simply for convenience and a little security. If it means I can't fly, I don't fly.

Name one government that gave back a right it took.
Historically, even after Marshall law is relaxed, it is NEVER the same, there are new mandates, strictures, and laws. ALWAYS.

TSA is your very own domestic Police State Overlord Enforcers.

They won't be mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- WysiWyg (profile), 7 Apr 2012 @ 9:11am
  
  Re: Inconcistency in TSA Handling
  "As a point of fact, the weapons used by the 9/11 terrorists DID NOT GET CARRIED ABOARD BY THEM.
  They were placed there by EMPLOYEES."
  
  Care to elaborate on that? Perhaps a source or two?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael (profile), 7 Apr 2012 @ 12:11pm
  
  Re: Inconcistency in TSA Handling
  You've given up your right to air travel.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymouse Dron, 7 Apr 2012 @ 7:14am

Month long vacation in Asia...
A max legal size carry-on bag (9 x 14 x 22 inches IIRC) crammed to the f'in brim with consumer electronics , right down to a shortwave 'field' radio. DSes, PSP, cameras, walkie talkie, iPods and phones, charges, headphones, GPS, etc.

Laptop was separate, in the also-permitted laptop case. A walking Best Buy store. Even brought a power bar so that we wouldn't run out of seat AC outlets on the aircraft. LOL.

Checked bag had the metal detector for an afternoon of beach combing under the coconut trees.

No problems at all. One inspector was a bit concerned by two loose 9-volt batteries in the inventory we brought. But his supervisor decided that there were enough sources of electricity to light up a small city, so he waved us through.

Cute wife brought a dozen pairs of shoes in her carry on bag.

Best. Vacation. Ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vlad, 7 Apr 2012 @ 8:47am

Watch me, I'll bring in a nice AlienWare gaming desktop. lol!

screening electronics like this is useless because if they were bombs, chemical scanning (which happens automatically) will pick it up. If you used a sophisticated software to detonate one, any laptop size, ipad, macbook, smartphone would do it.

So really... would they screen someone's hair for potentially hiding something under what they might presume to be a wig?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Xjy Xjy, 11 Apr 2012 @ 3:20pm

Ritual humiliation
If they monitored heart rate at security I'd never get on board. I was once a bit flustered after hurrying to catch up with a friend at Heathrow and was swearing under my breath - immediately some goon woman was next to me asking if I felt "uncomfortable"...
The joke is, that if you strip off naked to avoid all the shit they arrest you for disturbing the peace. It's like Playboy - a big soft porno tease.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2012 @ 8:47am

Varies by agency as well
There is a lot of variation depending on where you are as well. When I travel, I always take my Kindle. I never had an issue. When I went to the UK last time, they made me take it out.

TSA, as mentioned above, don't care about something like this.

UK Customs did.

So the definition of 'electronic device' really varies depending on where you are it seems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 24 Aug 2012 @ 4:14pm

Agents don't have a clue about netbooks
I've tried keeping my netbook in the bag a half a dozen times and each and every time, the TSA agents have to take the netbook out and scan everything again. AFAIK, they've never notified their agents about this netbook rule, and the agents don't read their own web site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Damosel Smith, 4 Sep 2013 @ 6:07am

Laptops are designed to be efficient, easy to use and fast, all while taking up only a little bit of space. Some are designed for different purposes and come in different sizes. For example, laptops designed for extreme portability can be less than a quarter inch thin but lack processor power, while gaming laptops will be more powerful, but less portable. The screen is one of the most important parts of a laptop. Choosing the right size depends on your needs but can be relatively simple to decide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vaughn, 1 Nov 2013 @ 11:27am

tech
yes Damosel, I agree portability on these smaller t4 units has become a big issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mosleyjennifer10 (profile), 8 Feb 2014 @ 1:33am

Another excellent example of innovation, I am happy to find it. There are so several developers working on this segment but this is one of the best innovative idea ever. Thanks for sharing it here.

imacland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Juanita, 4 Dec 2014 @ 5:36pm

Boogie Man
"Security Theater"?

You're right, such a thing is hardly a foreign (or new concept). Heck, it's what parents do every night for the kid that's scared of the boogie man. "See little Susie? I've just checked under your bed and nothing was there. But, we'll leave your door open just in case you get scared...".

However, it makes me wonder what other unnecessary rules are being pushed on passengers for the sake of soothing the incessantly paranoid. How many flights have been missed over something so asinine?

*sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Judy Alex, 9 Dec 2014 @ 11:41pm

Size Matters
When you go to any other country or even traveling any every best suitable bags are important for that. The business of travelling bags distributors & manufacturing getting improved because of more traveling needs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]