Forced MPAA Filter On IsoHunt Means Legitimate Content Is Being Censored

from the not-cool dept

Mon, Apr 9th 2012 8:15am — Mike Masnick

One of the more bizarre rulings in copyright/file sharing cases was the district court ruling in the IsoHunt search engine case a couple years ago. It's still involved in the appeals process, but the district court is one of the only courts so far to broadly interpret the DMCA's "red flags" rule to mean that general knowledge means you have to block access. The ruling ended up being that IsoHunt basically had to accept a keyword filter from the MPAA and block all access to anything that matched the keywords. As you can imagine, that's leading to significant overblocking of legitimate content.

TorrentFreak has the unfortunate story of filmmaker Brian Taylor, who released a short horror film called "the Bite" via his En Queue Film production studio, and decided to distribute it via isoHunt. However, that's when things went bad:

"I got it going, had downloads start from the US and Europe almost immediately, which made me a very happy guy," Taylor told TorrentFreak.

However, this enthusiasm faded quickly when he tried to access the torrent from a US connection a day later. Instead of a link to the torrent file the filmmaker was welcomed with the following message. “Torrent has been censored, as required by US court.”

They also note that a torrent of public domain music has been blocked by the MPAA (even though the MPAA's filter is about movies, not music). Of course, this is what happens when you force overblocking and the use of technologically stupid filtering methods like keywords. What's amazing is that a court made this same mistake a decade ago with Napster (forcing keyword blocking) and it didn't work then, and doesn't work now. It's amazing that judges who clearly are technologically illiterate find it reasonable to make rules up out of thin air like this one, that not only does little to block any actual infringement, but does plenty to block legitimate uses of tools.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: brian taylor, censorship, dmca, filtering, mpaa
Companies: isohunt

160 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:26am

OMG, federal judges are sooo stooopid! Nobody's smarter than Spike Spaznick!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Glen, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:48am
  
  Re:
  Stay Classless troll.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:51am
  
  Re:
  He didn't say anything about the judges being stupid. He said they were "technologically illiterate". But we wouldn't expect you to understand the difference between ignorance and stupidity now would we?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:45pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I got a parking ticket incorrectly. Apparently the law is technically illiterate and should be abolished.
    
    Real effective logic there.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Torg (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:47pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      If you got a parking ticket for walking on a sidewalk that you're not allowed to park a car by, then yes, the law is technically illiterate.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 3:07pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You have obviously never had to explain the internet to someones grandmother. It doesn't matter how smart they are it just doesn't make sense at first.
      
      Having done tech work for lawyers I know how clueless they can be, its not a intelligence problem its a generation gap. Sure after some time your can get anyone's grandma using a gmail account, but do they really understand what works and how it works? Not usually. It is the same thing with these judges, who have never searched for a torrent, or used iso hunt or downloaded much of anything. They just don't understand how these things work and the best ways to go about fixing them. So they implement something laughably stupid to anyone who has a good deal of tech experience, like keyword filtering on a search engine.
      
      My Titanic Failure - a independent CC movie about a judge who makes stupid decsions gets blocked from isohunt
      
      T1tanic
      Tit@nic
      t i t a n i c
      titan ic - All illegal torrents of James Cameron's Titanic all easily available on isohunt.
      
      But no youre right they are judges so this is a genius system.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 5:57pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      So you'd rather get parking tickets incorrectly than change the law? Wow, someone's certainly got money to spare.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:51pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "I got a parking ticket incorrectly. Apparently the law is technically illiterate and should be abolished."
    
    Real effective logic there.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:45am
  
  Re:
  Read the freaking article dummy
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ToFit, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:27am

The independents need to sue for business interference and press FTC to break up the monoply and unfair trade practices. They should press for the 150k damages for each media item distribution loss as the media companies claim each transaction is worth.

This MPAA and RIAA activity might even be chargable for raketeering if you could ever get the government to look at this seriously or understand that small businesses are being harmed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:34am
  
  Re: Too?Fit?
  The guv bums are bought (via lies, lobbying, bribes, whatever), and the independent artists cannot afford to purchase any justice, and so they will have no justice.
  
  (Also, "raketeering?" Wouldn't that mean "engaged in raking"?)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- gorehound (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:06am
  
  Re:
  They never will until We as a People Vote out the Source of the Problem.
  And the Source of the Problem is both the Democrats and the Republicans.
  They both need to appease their MPAA/RIAA Masters.
  If not they will miss their millions in blood money.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:32am

Moral of the story, don't attempt to distribute legitimate content through sites that are dominated by piracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Benjo (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:36am
  
  Re:
  So don't use torrents to distribute? How stupid is that?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - bobsta, 31 Jul 2012 @ 9:24pm
    
    Re: Re:
    free mass advertising man that's how stupid it is.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chris Rhodes (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:36am
  
  Re:
  Instead, trundle down to your local RIAA/MPAA-controlled venue, hand over your copyright forever, and prepare to receive the rich, 0.5% royalty rewards* that your work will accrue!
  
  *Royalties not guaranteed. There may be a team of lawyers working on ways to refuse to pay out. See fine print for details.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:54am
    
    Re: Re:
    Or use YouTube, put them on your own file server in any number of formats, put them on a free hosting server, etc... There are more distribution methods that reach a greater number of potential viewers than torrent listing sites.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:59am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      How can we put them on Youtube. You said we should avoid any sites that are dominated by piracy. According to Viacom, Youtube is the pirate flagship.
      
      As for your other suggestions, I don't think those would work, especially when someone is wanting to get mass exposure. Personal hosting is great when you already have a following, or when you have tons of money to make a large following. Using existing services that have large numbers of users is far better for independent artists to get the mass following necessary to make such self hosting worthwhile.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        According to GWiz ("Really? Isohunt get a million unique visitors a day.") YouTube would have been a far better choise since it gets 1000 times as many visitors per day than isohunt. So your arguments are ridiculous, and I don't give a fuck what Viacom says about YouTube, obviously Mr. Taylor doesn't either otherwise he wouldn't have used torrent streams to distribute his video. Please Mr. Knight tell use what percentage of torrent traffic is authorized distribution.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:30am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Obviously, I don't have that data. However, according to the Supreme Court ruling in the Betamax case, it doesn't matter:
        
        http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/464/417/
        
        Whatever the future percentage of legal versus illegal home-use recording might be, an injunction which seeks to deprive the public of the very tool or article of commerce capable of some noninfringing use would be an extremely harsh remedy, as well as one unprecedented in copyright law.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:58am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        And of course, crickets from the shill after that, since there's nothing he could even remotely spin to say that was wrong.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:54pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        yep it happens a lot ;D
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Robert (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:38am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "what percentage..." 78%.
        
        The remaining 22% is unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material.
        
        I made that number up, just like the losses were made up by the MPAA/RIAA/IFPI/etc.. and you have no proof or means to prove counter to my claims (unlike the data the discredits the MPAA/RIAA/IFPI/etc.. data).
        
        Everyone should be able to use the technology available, via physical stores or bitTorrent or whatever they choose. That's called fair access to distribution means. And such fair access does not exist because the MPAA/RIAA/IFPI/etc.. fear competition (they know most of what they release could not stand up against several independent works).
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:18pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "I made that number up, just like the losses were made up by the MPAA/RIAA/IFPI/etc.. and you have no proof or means to prove counter to my claims (unlike the data the discredits the MPAA/RIAA/IFPI/etc.. data)."
        
        Actually you didn't make it up "just like" they do. Your numbers actually add up to 100%. If they would have made up the numbers it would be more like...
        
        130%/-2%
        
        Mathematics isn't their strong suit remember?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:42pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        My percentage is 100% authorized.
        Others I don't care.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:05am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Like the Youtube that is being sued, or hosting services such as megaupload that are being arrested and sued? When observably these people think "piracy" = "anything that doesn't give most if not all of the money straight to the **AA companies" it rather sounds like you did nothing to challenge Mr Rhodes' point.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:09am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      There are more distribution methods that reach a greater number of potential viewers than torrent listing sites.
      
      Really? Isohunt get a million unique visitors a day. That's damn good for the price.
      
      And the underlying point is still there:
      
      Torrents are a completely legal and reasonable way to distribute a work you own the rights to. The MPAA filter is blocking legitimate content they have no rights to. Bottom line.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:10am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        YouTube gets over 1 BILLION users per day.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:12am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You can't download from Youtube. I think that is the point you are missing. Isohunt is about being able to download content. Not stream it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Richard (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:19am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Actually you can download from Youtube - all yiou need is a plugin eg realplayer
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:23am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You CAN download from YouTube, it just violates their terms of service.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:27am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        So why are you suggesting it as a way to distribute content for download? You are making no sense whatsoever.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:30am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It's "pick a tiny part of a sentence you can disagree with and ignore the rest even if doing so invalidates your previous argument"-day.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        That One Guy (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:02am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I thought they always did that, or is it that they just do it a little bit more on that particular day?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:06am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That's the part of my argument he picked so I rebutted his argument. He was the one that chose the straw mand argument. I have addressed the other parts of his comment it other threads I don't want to just repeat the same thing over and over again.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Apparently, you do, since that's all that you seem to do around here.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        The Logician (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:14pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Your assumption of the .torrent format's nature is incorrect, Gray AC. The format and the use of it are two different things, and it would be advisable for you to see them as such. The .torrent format is merely that, a format, a tool. Nothing more and nothing less. Its uses are widely varied, so do not focus on one merely because it displeases you. You state that that is its only use without any empirical data to support that conclusion. Therefore, your argument is invalid.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:23pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I don't think you understand what a strawman argument is. We are talking about someone who is trying to legally distribute his content via download being blocked from doing so.
        
        You are the one making suggestions that don't meet 1 or more of the following criteria:
        
        1) Allow for a direct download.
        2) Provides a high enough bandwidth for mass distribution
        3) Have wide exposure
        
        Torrents and IsoHunt meet all those requirements.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        But that's what the people from your perspective do. Repeat the same flawed arguments with the same made up preposterous claims over and over in hopes that if they say it loud enough and often enough enough people will believe it that they have effectively justified their abuses of people.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:36pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That's the part of my argument he picked so I rebutted his argument.
        Except it completely contradicted your own earlier argument.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:00am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        isn't that contradicting your statement of not using a service dominated by piracy?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:08am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        YouTube is not DOMINATED by piracy. Not matter what you THINK Viacom is arguing. No one could make that claim, even you can't make that claim and you know it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:53pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Ok. So you are saying that Youtube is not dominated by piracy. You claim that no one can make that argument seriously. Yet, here you are claiming that a technology you obviously don't understand is DOMINATED by piracy. Do you have some inside knowledge on every torrent everywhere that the rest of us do not have?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:58pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        The funny thing is that I agree with you that Youtube is not dominated by piracy... I'm just pointing out that by your own admission YouTube can be used to pirate, so can IsoHunt, but apparently IsoHunt is so bad because you can directly download a file in a non-roundabout manner.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:24am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "Don't use sites that have piracy, just use this site and tell users to use it illegally. That will fix all your problems with useless laws stifling your ability to distribute."
        
        DERP whhhaaaa?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:14am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I don't think you understand the difference between illegal and against their terms of service. They are completely different.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:39am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Sorry you are right it is not illegal. Still your argument is don't use this service designed to let people download your work because lots of pirates also use that service. Use this other service not designed to let people download your work and then give them instructions on how to download it even though that violates the terms of service and will have your video pulled and your account suspended.
        
        Lets just agree that youtube is not a viable alternative to torrents.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:03pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        What they are confused about is why you think IsoHunt is dominated by Piracy, but YouTube isn't. Just because you can't download something directly from Youtube without violating their user agreement doesn't mean the stuff on YouTube is automatically piracy free. Even though YouTube is full of infringing material, it is still legal, and a lot of content that is legitimate is censored through bogus takedown notices in the name of censoring the actually infringing material.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        silverscarcat (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:52am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yes, and every single one of them looks at the same thing.
        
        I think you're confusing "hits" with "users".
        
        I know I check on Youtube like 80 times a day.
        
        That's 80 different hits from 1 person.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:38am
  
  Re:
  I'm just going to assume that you're completely obvious to the fact that you've thoroughly contradicted yourself there and laugh uproariously.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Machin Shin (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:40am
  
  Re:
  What a wonderful idea, now why don't you enlighten us all on the other wonderful distribution methods that are out there for these artists to use. Now remember this distribution service needs to be free, extremely fast, and able to reach a large number of people easily.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - :Lobo Santo (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:54am
    
    Re: Re: Quick Fast & Easy
    You and your requirements!
    
    If you have ludicrous requirements like "fast" "easy" "free" "lots of people" then of course you land on torrents!
    
    Don't you get it? If the gatekeepers die out, we'll have no gates! We already have no Jobs (Steve Jobs 1955-2011), no Cash (Johnny Cash 1932-2003), and no Hope (Bob Hope 1903-2003) and you want Bill Gates dead!!??!! What's wrong with you?!
    
    /troll
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - That One Guy (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:05am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Quick Fast & Easy
      Thankfully Kevin Bacon is still alive, don't even want to think of what would disappear with his death...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Torg (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:39am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Quick Fast & Easy
      In that case, all we need to do is get an old celebrity to change their last name to "piracy", "copyright", or "corruption" and wait for the problem to solve itself.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:00am
    
    Re: Re:
    YouTube, Vimeo, DailyMotion, just to name a few. Or put your video on free hosting sites in the format of your choice. http://www.free-webhosts.com/webhosting-01.php
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:17am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      webhosting might work, but it's hard when you have a small or non-existent fan base.
      
      And, I don't see how YouTube, Vimeo, or any other video sharing site is any better than a file sharing site. In case you've never been on YouTube bogus take down notices abound aplenty...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:25am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah of the billions of videos that are hosted on YouTube you would be concerned about his video being taken down because of a bogus takedown? Please try to find a better argument because that was lame.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        That One Guy (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:06am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah, cause it totally wasn't blocked on the site listed due to a bogus word filter program...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:08am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        which is pretty much how the automated takedown system that companies have in place works for youtube and various other sites. If your content contains certain keywords or tags the system will send a notice.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:07am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You must be new here :D
        
        Bogus takedowns is a problem, youtube receives a million takedowns per year, not like "OMG half of youtube is censored by bogus takedowns!" but enough to be a big concern.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - AzureSky (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:39am
      
      sorry but
      sorry but those sites do not allow unlimited bandwidth, they also limit concurrent connections and download speeds(as to be fair to other users)
      
      Vimeo isnt ideal, most people I talk to have no clue what Vimeo is or cant watch videos there due to buffering issues.
      
      DailyMotion isnt ideal for similar reasons, Also your forced to use formats approved by said services, much like youtube where the quality tends to be questionable after encoding to youtube formats...
      
      really these days, torrent based hosting makes alot more sense if you want to share quality content, streaming sites force you to compromise on quality, also streaming content dosnt work to well if somebody wants to watch it offline like many people I know do when travling.
      
      also note that I am quite sure that the MPAA and RIAA view these sites as just a shade less rogue then megaupload.
      
      just like mediafire is now a target of the MPAA these sites that could be used for infringement are all evil according to the mpaa/riaa, because they dont give the riaa/mpaa the majority of their income.
      
      I have seen every major video hosting service/site listed at one time or another as "rogue", no reasonable service is free from these accusations, and if one shows up, it will be accused...its a given....
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Machin Shin (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      None of those compare to what you get from torrents and you are kidding yourself thinking they are. YouTube, Vimeo and such end up being lower quality and they are streams. A stream of a video is not the same as actually having the video file.
      
      You then point to free web hosts. I guess you missed the part about being FAST. On a free web host you are going to be sharing a server with who knows how many other web pages. If you get 10-20 people downloading an HD video from your site while others are on the other pages on the server then it is going to be a crawl. Not to mention the fact the host will promptly throttle you or just kick you off.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:26am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Free web hosting is not going to support multiple direct downloads of a movie. It would be slow as shit or just crash out right. It is not a viable alternative to torrents.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:13am
    
    Re: Re:
    said the mpaa/riaa shill
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:48am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Says the freeloading pirate. See name calling doesn't really accomplish anything especially when you don't know me or my circumstances.
      
      I work as a software engineer for a business software company.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:03am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You are a software engineer and you have no clue what a torrent is and what makes it useful? I thought I have seen everything in this world, but a software engineer that is clueless about software is new to me.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:11pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Unfortunately, it's not new to me
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        This is what happens when you have an educational system based on chasing vapid grades and pieces of paper that are supposed to represent knowledge by regurgitation. People hired in positions that they aren't qualified for because they were good little conformers in school instead of actually learning something.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Cowardly Anonymous, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        There are plenty of people that can't even write simple code walking out of college with a BA in computer science. I see the next wave of them every day in class and when working on projects. They just spam different common versions of syntax until something compiles and call it a day.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Lets see, circumstances.....you claim to be a software engineer, but don't know a damn thing about software, so you're moonlighting in hopes to be hired to be a **AA shill, or you're just flat-out lying about the software engineer thing, and are already being paid to be a shill.
        
        I'm pretty sure that covers it, shill.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:52am
  
  Re:
  Moral of the story, don't attempt to distribute legitimate content through sites that are dominated by piracy.
  
  So you admit that the filtering doesn't work then.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:03am
    
    Re: Re:
    I don't care if the filtering works or not, I don't use torrent distribution for anything. I don't seek out pirated works, I don't upload videos, I don't share illegal content, I don't download illegal content. It's that simple.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - MrWilson, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:06am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "I don't use torrent distribution for anything"
      
      Then I take it you don't have a level 85 Draenei paladin?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:09am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I dont even know what that is.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:22am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It's secret pirate speak for downloading all the movies. ALL of them........
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2012 @ 3:59am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Not only does the software engineer not understand torrents, he also doesn't understand google.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:08am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Those things may or may not be true, but I'd still risk a wager that you are still guilty of copyright ingringement.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:12am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      I don't use torrent distribution for anything. I don't seek out pirated works, I don't upload videos, I don't share illegal content, I don't download illegal content. It's that simple.
      
      I don't do any of the things you listed either, but I still use torrents. It's that simple.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:01am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Please Gwiz, tell me how often you use torrents for LEGAL means. It isn't a very popular distribution method for LEGAL content.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:17am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Jamendo is a music site offering access to more than 30,000 Creative Commons-licensed albums. All music is available for free via direct download and BitTorrent.
        
        Gameupdates.org features a few thousand torrents specifically tailored towards the gaming community, but we�re not just talking patches and demo relases: The site also offers access to a few hundred trailers, previews and in some cases even full-featured films promoting games like Grand Theft Auto IV, Guild Wars 2 and Star Wars: The Old Republic.
        
        Public Domain Torrents is a slightly older site with the occasional database error, but that only seems to be fitting for the subject matter. The site features hundreds of torrents for movies with expired copyright. In other words: Pretty old stuff. Or classics, depending on your point of view.
        
        Legit Torrents is aggregating legally available torrents from various sources, with the content including the NIN concert DVD Another Version of the Truth and the Michael Moore film Slacker Uprising.
        
        Limecast is a podcast directory operated by the makers of Limewire. Users can opt to stream or download clips right within their browser, or access torrent files for episodes of popular podcasts like GeekBrief.TV, Diggnation or the Ricky Gervais Podcast. Not all the feeds seem to be up to date, but the site is still pretty neat.
        
        Mininova is still serving access to close to 10,000 legitimate torrents, including HD space mission footage from NASA, documentaries from public broadcasters and user-generated animation shorts. Mininova still clocks about 300,000 downloads per day.
        
        Blizzard games studio, makers of World of Warcraft, use torrents to distribute all their content. From new installs to patches.
        
        Most of that was pulled from: http://gigaom.com/video/ten-more-sites-for-free-and-legal-torrents/
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You know, that statistical information pertaining to mininova is interesting. It would have been great to throw in the faces of the kids claiming because MU had a 10 to 1 download to upload ratio it was used primarily to infringe.
        
        If mininova only has 10,000 legitimate files still up and gets 300k downloads a day that would mean in 3 days it would be well under the 10-1 ratio.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:56pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Let's not forget my personal favorite:
        
        The Humble Bundle allows for torrent downloading of all games purchased through it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        why is comment so broken T.T
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:10pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I was trying to say that I
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:11pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Oh, ok I know what the problem was...
        
        anyway I was trying to say "I love the Humble Bundle, got a lot of great games from that"
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:38am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Well for one, every time PlaneShift puts out a client update. I download via torrent and try to seed it as much as possible.
        
        I have downloaded and watched the first couple of the Pioneer One episodes.
        
        I also plan on checking out some of the artists who pop up on The Promo Bay just to support them.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I don't see how that's of any relevance to the story.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:15pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I love how yet again, point proven which he can't answer, and.....suddenly goes quiet.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:20pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Really? Hmm. That must be while recently the Cyanogenmod team has put all their nightlies and release candidates and stable ROMs up and available through download using torrents.
        
        It must also be why awhile back I got to preview Windows 8. Released through a torrent.
        
        I guess that's the same reason quite a few BIG game companies release updates and patches through torrents.
        
        Hmm. I know of quite a few bands, software companies, etc that do nothing but release stuff using torrents. Why? Because IT IS LEGAL. It eases the burden of hosting the data themselves, while allowing for maximum upload/download rate (which the users handle) and so on and so forth.
        
        Oh, and I forgot to mention, there are a plethora of albums, shows and movies also being distributed freely and legally through torrents. Vodo anyone?
        
        Yes, but we'll take the word of some Anonymous Coward who claims to be a software programmer on the legality and usefulness of torrents and torrent sites. He's obviously quite educated and knowledgeable. /s
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Cowardly Anonymous, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:28pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Blizzard maintained a torrent for the official downloading of Starcraft Broodwars for many years. I don't know if it still exists, as it has been a long time since the last time I had reason to download it. That one is not only legal, it's proprietary.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:56pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        They handle all their software distribution that way now. They have a bunch of high bandwidth servers spread around so you still download primarily from them, but you do share with other peers. So if all their servers got slammed the network could support it. But most people downloading a game or patch, with Blizzard's software, close it after its done so you don't have the same kind of long term seeders as you would with a normal client.
        
        Really its a easy way for them to spread out the 10+ million downloads of a 500mb file in a 24 hour period when they patch WOW. They don't have to worry about mirror links, region based web addresses or one server buckling under the pressure of the requests, they just use available resources from their pre-existing network more than they use real peer-to-peer distribution.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 6:18pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I take it you don't watch Miro TV.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2012 @ 1:23pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'd just like to say thanks for all the info in this subthread about public domain torrents et al. Lots of great stuff for me to check out over the weekend there. Cheers guys!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2012 @ 11:03pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'd just like to say thanks for all the info in this subthread about public domain torrents et al. Lots of great stuff for me to check out over the weekend there. Cheers guys!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:13am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You are not the market these people are targeting. So why should they listen to your "advice"?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - weneedhelp (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:16am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      We don't care what you do or don't do.
      
      Want a cookie?
      
      I have been using torrents for a while for perfectly legitimate reasons. Just because YOU don't use it doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't.
      
      I mean hell, you dont use your brain either. Err!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Richard (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:36am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      I don't use torrent distribution for anything.
      
      Then you are a fool to ignore the cheapest distribution method available.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:14am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      said the mpaa/riaa shill
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:18am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "I don't care if the filtering works or not, I don't use torrent distribution for anything. I don't seek out pirated works, I don't upload videos, I don't share illegal content, I don't download illegal content I DON'T HAVE FREINDS, I DON'T HAVE A LIFE. It's that simple."
      
      There fixed it for you.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Lowestofthekeys, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:24am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "I don't care if the filtering works or not, I don't use torrent distribution for anything. I don't seek out pirated works, I don't upload videos, I don't share illegal content, I don't download illegal content. It's that simple."
      
      You sound incredibly out of touch with technology, especially when you equate the innovation of torrent distribution with only piracy.
      
      Plenty of legitimate uses have been found for distribution via torrent, in fact the movie titled "The Tunnel" found success being trnasferred via torrent (http://www.thetunnelmovie.net/).
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:29am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      So your argument is: "I don't care if something he finds useful is not available to him because some giant company doesn't like it because it is not a service I use. If I can make it through life without needing something so can this guy!" ?? because your alternatives all suck. But you wouldn't know that because you don't have a need to distribute large files to random audiences in large groups quickly.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - silverscarcat (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:57am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      So I guess you've never found out about various video games that are fun but impossible to get here in the U.S. then?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:55am
  
  Re:
  Moral of the story, don't attempt to distribute legitimate content through sites that are dominated by piracy.
  
  Yeah. And don't record Little Susie's birthday party on a VCR tape either.
  
  Those things are great tidal waves of Boston Stranglers that will make the film industry bleed and hemorrhage forever.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - TaCktiX (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:00am
    
    Re: Re:
    If only. Then we wouldn't have to worry about their moaning today because they would've died out by the time the 1990's rolled around.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:05am
    
    Re: Re:
    What are you talking about. Your comment is not even remotely related to my comment. You might as well have typed in random words.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Modplan (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:16am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Do you really not know your history?
      
      It was argued that the VCR would kill TV because it allowed people to commit piracy, and they should be allowed to effectively ban it. It's only use as far as they were concerned was piracy. Courts ruled that time shifting was fair use, and entertainment companies made lots of money from home video regardless.
      
      So before you claim people should move on to services that aren't pirate havens, you might want to provide the name of a service that:
      
      a) Isn't some sort of haven to piracy
      b) Is still useful to artists wanting to distribute their work for free (to them) and free of charge (to their fans)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      What are you talking about. Your comment is not even remotely related to my comment. You might as well have typed in random words.
      
      Lol. Not random words. A paraphrasing of Jack Valenti's words concerning the VCR and how it would destroy the film industry in the early 80's. Kind of like today, with the MPAA and all these so called "sites that are dominated by piracy".
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:16pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        And once again, he's shown how he's wrong.....and disappears.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:47pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I think he's been taking lessons from bob.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah he reminds me a lot of the troll AC from the comments of the "Megaupload Points Out That The Feds Want To Destroy Relevant Evidence In Its Case" post.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:04am
  
  Re:
  Your logic elsewhere:
  
  Moral of the story, don't attempt to communicate in English because some people use English to swindle others out of money.
  
  Moral of the story, don't use kitchen knives to chop vegetables because some people have stabbed others with kitchen knives.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:08am
    
    Re: Re:
    Not even close, the dominate use of the English language is to communicate, not to swindle. The dominate use of knives is to cut food not to stab others.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:14am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      The dominate use of torrents is to distribute content not pirate.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - A Monkey with Attitude, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Unless your a troll or shill then:
      
      the dominate use of the English language is to to swindle, not communicate.
      
      FTFY
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Dreddsnik, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:25am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      " Not even close, the dominate use of the English language is to communicate, not to swindle. The dominate use of knives is to cut food not to stab others. "
      
      The dominaNT ( note the correction ) of all language is, in fact, to obfuscate. Communication has always been secondary to deception. Examine any carefully worded contract or legal document. The wordings are used to hide true intent and leave room for loopholes. Heck even the Bible ( if you believe in 'magic books' ) states ....
      
      7 " Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech."
      
      which would indicate the creation of different languages was meant to create confusion.
      
      Language was always primarily a means of deception and confusion.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - weneedhelp (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:27am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "The dominate use of knives is to cut food"
      
      ASSuming thats all you believe a knife can do.
      
      http://www.acetoolonline.com/Klein-Special-Purpose-Knives-s/7874.htm
      http://www.service.klei ntools.com/Tool/PRD/Category/Special-Purpose%20Knives%20KNIVES-SPECIAL%20PU
      https://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/M9_bayonet
      
      Knives serve many purposes, and I will even go as far as to say the dominate use of knives is not to cut food.
      
      "Not even close, the dominate use of the English language is to communicate, not to swindle."
      So f'in stupid I will just leave it at that.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- weneedhelp (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:20am
  
  Re:
  "don't attempt to distribute legitimate content through sites that are dominated by piracy."
  
  According to greetards like yourself, there are no legitimate services.
  
  Every one that pops up gets attacked for... OMG a user may have uploaded something they did not have authority to do so. EEEEkkk! Off with their heads.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- monkyyy, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:47am
  
  Re:
  wait...... ur comment was distributed through the internet?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:15pm
  
  Re:
  Yes, if you don't like the truth, just "report" it out of existence. That is the problem with this site, you really ARE a bunch of mindless knobs who refuse to listen to any opinion that doesn't allow you to steal content, that supports the MPAA, the RIAA, ASCAP, hell establishment of any kind. I give up trying to educate you, you want to remain ignorant fine. I wont be returning to this site, see this is why you feel like so many people on here agree with you, you run everyone else off.
  
  The "report" button should be used for people who are making OFFENSIVE comments not for people with opinions that differ from yours. Censorship of opposing opinions is worse than collatoral damage from takedown notices.
  
  Now instead of having discussions you can all just use thumbs up to say what a great job Mike is doing and you can pat each other on the back. That makes this site even less useful than it already was.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:37pm
    
    Re: Re:
    In which world an opinion will ever stop anyone from stealing anything if they so desire to do so?
    
    LoL
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:40pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Tell me, if we're the mindless knobs why can you not back up your assertions with actual, proven facts instead of parroting the PR of these lobbying companies? People like you ARE offensive to us, because you spew mindless 'factoids' out as if they were /real/, and scream at us to prove our assertions without doing likewise for yourself. You even go silent when someone presents you with facts to back themselves up.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Torg (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:49pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Normally I don't like reporting opposing viewpoints, but you just made it too tempting that time.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:55pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Oh I see, you got backed into a corner on all of your points so instead of responding to them and/or admitting you were wrong you just attack us for reporting your stupidity. See you tomorrow.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Cowardly Anonymous, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:39pm
    
    Re: Re:
    It's not gone, just a little harder to see. The large amount of discussion following the comment is likely to entice people to view it anyways, which they still have the option to do. Please take the time to contrast this with Brian Taylor's experience with the MPAA filter.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:12pm
    
    Re: Re:
    There's no reason why differing opinions can't also be offensive.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - bongo houzi (profile), 1 May 2012 @ 7:53pm
    
    Re: Re:
    don't let the website hit you in the ass on the way out.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:49pm
  
  Re:
  Well if I can't use .torrent files because they are dominated by piracy, I say we should ban .mp4 .mpeg .avi .mkv etc. because they are used for piracy too!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:54am

it's what happens when you have morons that dont understand technology making court rulings concerning technology. those that are having legal content blocked need to sue those that have had the keyword filter put in place, not the site that has been forced to implement that filter. the judge should also be severely reprimanded for instructing isohunt to implement the filter without having any idea of the consequences. no point in lurching from one balls up to another one without knowing the detrimental effects first. suffering 'collateral damage' is a poor excuse and doesn't help those with the blocked, legitimate content!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zos (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:03am

Given that they don't understand the tech, or why keyword blocking won't work, it's not precisely reasonable to expect them to understand, or even be aware of the existence of, those tools you mention.
Here's what we've learned from the drug war... "You, and everything about your incomprehensible hippy lifestyle are now criminals. it doesn't matter how we screw up your lives, because all of you dirty pirates are breaking the law. You aren't consumers, or voters, or citizens. you're defendants in waiting, in need of being run to ground." If we don't have a law that fits you're crime, we'll make some shit up. Or we'll charge your wife with conspiracy (kim dotcom's learning all about this one).

Get used to it. pirate is the new dopefiend. (and anyone not toeing the line is a pirate. or a terrorist. whatever.)
Welcome to being the new enemy in "the war on".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zos (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:04am
  
  Re:
  your* /sigh
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:25am
  
  Re:
  I'm pretty sure the **AA has already started the "War on Piracy" if not in name, at least in tactics.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:40am
    
    Re: Re:
    The "War on Piracy" is Hollywood-speak for failing to compete.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 9:10am

There was a filter?
wow, I've never even noticed a filter on IsoHunt. I don't think it works very well, it's still pretty easy to find "infringing" material there, and anything I don't find on IsoHunt I can just go grab from TPB, sooo what does that filter even accomplish?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:20am
  
  Re: There was a filter?
  it accomplishes case law...that's the only way the **IAs know how to "innovate"
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bengie, 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:09am

Punishment
"They also note that a torrent of public domain music has been blocked by the MPAA (even though the MPAA's filter is about movies, not music)"

There needs to be legal recourse for when "mistakes" are made. Both the Judge and the company should be held responsible.

We need punishments that scale so three "mistakes" within a year will bankrupt any company, no matter how large.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Machin Shin (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:42am
  
  Re: Punishment
  I vote for the 6 strikes and we cut the companies access to the internet. They seem to think this is a logical and fair punishment so why not turn it around and see what they say.
  
  Of course these don't need to be actual "mistakes". They just have to be accused 6 times and then without warning cut their net.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Cowardly Anonymous, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:45pm
    
    Re: Re: Punishment
    Freeze their assets, accuse them of criminal conspiracy and dump all of their data too.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
lexieliberty (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 10:22am

Bitches don't know how use the internet.
MPAA is lame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Guy (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:04am

Appeal
Now that they can prove censorship of legitimate expression is being carried out, it sounds like it's time for a new appeal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:20am

Actually, it appears that ISOHunt is being particularly malicious in their application of the ruling, attempting to curry anger with people like you.

ISO Hunt is the one choosing what is and is not blocked. They can go a better job, but are appearing to choose not to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:30am
  
  Re:
  Better job or no, filter tech WILL cause these sorts of problems.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 11:59am
  
  Re:
  ISO Hunt is the one choosing what is and is not blocked. They can go a better job, but are appearing to choose not to.
  
  What? The MPAA provided the list of keywords, per the courts instructions. How exactly is IsoHunt choosing anything? They block stuff that matches the keyword list.
  
  It even says that in the article above:
  
  "The ruling ended up being that IsoHunt basically had to accept a keyword filter from the MPAA and block all access to anything that matched the keywords."
  
  If I was to create a documentary titled "The Last Hours of the Titanic" and I put it out a torrent of it, IsoHunt would have to block it in the US because of the word Titanic.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Robert (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:10pm
    
    Re: Re:
    The Last Hours of the Tie Tan Nick
    
    Or
    
    The Last Hours of the White Star ocean liner that sank after being struck by an iceberg, April 15, 1912.
    
    And then the MPAA will update their list to include "white, start, ocean, liner, sank, iceberg, April, 2012"
    
    LOL
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - bongo houzi (profile), 1 May 2012 @ 7:58pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      prolly already on the list
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 12:56pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Which again shows that ISO hunt isn't doing a good job with the filter, and is in fact being very literal and annoying to try to prove a point.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 1:42pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Which again shows that ISO hunt isn't doing a good job with the filter, and is in fact being very literal and annoying to try to prove a point.
      
      Ok. Let me explain this s-l-o-w-l-y for you.
      
      A keyword filter consists of a list of words. If the keyword appears in the name of the torrent (and maybe in the description - not sure about that part) IsoHunt has to block that torrent for US users. They have no choice at all. A keyword filter is, by it's nature, very literal. That's kind of the whole point of this article - that keyword filters for infringing content are not very efficient and will always block some legitimate content.
      
      And that is not even taking into account that content is considered infringing by how it is or has been used, not just because it exists.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Perhaps then ISO Hunt might want to consider not listing clearly infringing material, so that they may petition the court to one day lift the order.
        
        Seems like they did it to themselves, and now are administrating the filter in the most literal and poorest way possible.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Watchit (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:19pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        But the Users are the one's who name and upload files, is it really IsoHunt's fault someone uploads "HIGH QUALITY!!!1 Game Of Thrones XviD-FQM[ettv]" They provide the service, the users decide what to do with it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Gwiz (profile), 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:33pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Perhaps then ISO Hunt might want to consider not listing clearly infringing material,...
        
        And what exactly would "clearly infringing material" be?
        
        You understand that the internet is global, right? If a user in a country where file sharing is legal for personal use is sharing a with someone else in their own country then no infringement has occurred. Without knowing how the file is being used and by whom, you can't just say it is a infringing file.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 2:55pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        So....these filters show how hard it is to just remove all infringing content without taking out legitimate content and missing a ton of illegitimate content. This is the best solution that the court and MPAA lawyers could agree upon. So you have the audacity to say "well if isohunt would have thought up a better way to somehow remove all infringing content out of millions of user submitted posts daily they wouldn't have to follow this stupid court order."? Really so if they had just figured out a method that no one has ever been able to figure out they would have been fine.
        
        Also, you act like they have a choice in how they administer the filter. Its a court order to block the words given to them, they don't get to choose how to follow it. Its a fucking court order.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 3:44pm

Sure, censorship sucks. Sure, ISOHunt got sloppy and decided to apply the MPAA filter to all categories. People still use that site? *scratches head*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 Apr 2012 @ 8:37am
  
  Re:
  Yes, because it holds the best torrents for finding ways around broken DRM mechanisms.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Watchit (profile), 10 Apr 2012 @ 10:28am
  
  Re:
  yeah, there's still a lot of good torrents on IsoHunt. Plus their rating system and active comment section make it easy to avoid the bad torrents.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Apr 2012 @ 4:48pm

The guy right above you already did that troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
boo, 9 Apr 2012 @ 8:54pm

good junk
If copyright gurus actually put out a decent product, I bet most of the time they wouldn't have this problem. That and who wants to pay $30 bucks for blu-ray or $40 bucks for a 3-d blu-ray. No wonder this is an issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mustang03282, 11 Apr 2012 @ 4:04am

death of homebrew
This crap is killing the home brew scene. I was trying to update my dropad android tablet and every link I went to to download a newer better rom the link was taking down by the dog. These roms did not include google apps. You had to install gaaps yourself so there was no copy write infringement yet the doj still removed the links. How the hell does that make sence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Elliander, 12 Apr 2012 @ 3:52pm

I think film makers who release their films into the public domain to promote themselves and are then blocked should file a lawsuit against whatever companies placed the block in the first place on the grounds of "lost revenue" and "theft of intellectual property" - See, only the copyright holder has any legal rights over a piece of intellectual property. If an organization makes a legal claim against your property than that organization has stolen your intellectual property.

All it would take is one lawsuit for damages to go through. That would set a precedent which would end the matter completely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ferc Polo, 3 Aug 2012 @ 9:41am

Torrents =/= Piracy. End of story. This US rule of "Torrent = Terrorism" is horrifying. They are branding WORDS now. They started with Terrorist...that word means 'enemy of the state' these days. Now Torrent means "pirated work".

It's abominable that the American People are standing for this usurpation of their lexicon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]