Colombia Rushes Through Its Own SOPA In An 'Emergency Procedure' To Appease US Ahead Of Obama Visit
from the not-cool dept
Last fall, we wrote about how the Obama administration celebrated the signing of what they incorrectly called "free trade agreements" with Colombia, Panama and South Korea. These agreements had been the subject of significant controversy, but they did eventually get signed. Of course, the Obama administration -- via the USTR -- has long been a proponent of putting in ridiculous protectionism policies into free trade agreements. To this day, we still can't understand what copyright laws have to do with free trade. They're the opposite of free trade: they're government granted monopolies. We had warned about the excessive language in these agreements when it comes to copyright, and now we're starting to see the impact of that.President Obama is heading to Colombia this weekend for a summit, and we'd been hearing stories that US officials had been putting tremendous pressure on Colombian officials to pass new, ridiculously draconian copyright laws ahead of that visit. So that's exactly what the Colombian government did -- using an "emergency procedure" to rush through a bad bill that is quite extreme.
Earlier this year, Colombia tried to pass basically the same bill, which was called LesLleras, after Interior Minister German Vargas Lleras (who proposed it). That bill was so extreme that it resulted in SOPA-like protests, following significant concerns raised by the public as well as copyright and free speech experts. So, this time around, the government just claimed it was an emergency and rushed the bill through, despite all of its problems. They seemed to think that the public wouldn't notice -- but they're wrong.
As is typical of idiotic trade agreements pushed via the USTR -- who only seems to listen to Hollywood on these issues -- the copyright bill includes all sorts of draconian enforcement techniques and expansions of existing copyright law, and removal of free speech rights. But what it does not include are any exceptions to copyright law -- the very important tools that even the US Supreme Court admits are the "safety valves" that stop copyright law from being abusive, oppressive and contrary to freedom of speech. Public interest groups in Colombia are planning a Constitutional challenge to this new law, but the process itself is sickening.
To use an "emergency procedure" to pass a highly questionable law that was put in place through equally questionable means and diplomatic pressure -- and to ignore the public at large -- is really astounding. I'm ashamed of my own government for its efforts to pressure Colombia into such undemocratic and anti-free speech actions.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: colombia, copyright, free speech, free trade, obama, protectionism, ustr
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Colombia has a fame of being the US lapdog (along with the UK and a few other countries). Guess it's one more reason to sustain that belief.
I hope the Colombian slap their Govt and stop this..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
China's GPD is fast approaching the size of the US, by 2016 China's economy will be bigger then the US. And there's a lot of uncertainty in these numbers, some economics believe China's GDP is being underestimated and that China is already richer then the US.
I say this because China, with it's lax enforcement of copyright and IP is the one that stand to benefit most from these draconian laws. In China college professors are encouraged financially not to write papers, but to file for patents/copyrights on anything. The reason? So China can use that IP as a weapon against other countries economies, and help China's own economy grow even larger and even richer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When your an old country, you Littigate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Estonia
Georgia
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Li thuania
Moldova
Montenegro
Russia
Serbia
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unenforcable
It sucks that this happened, but you can pretty much expect nothing to change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe you should move then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Some of us realize that when you have a government that is going against the best interests of the public, the answer is to fix things. Not abandon your fellow citizens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Mike Masnick:
"best interests of the public"
= people producing desired goods for no compensation.
Mike Masnick is totally down with slave labor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Again and again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]