Kuwait Says Social Networks Must Be Regulated To 'Safeguard The Cohesiveness Of Society'
from the i-had-no-idea-it-was-at-risk dept
Apparently, an unregulated Twitter and Facebook might lead to society coming apart at the seams. At least that appears to be the somewhat ridiculous assertion of the Kuwaiti government as it prepares to regulate the usage of social networking sites, officially in order to "safeguard the cohesiveness of the population and society." Of course, that's silly. Social networking tools are used all the time to bring people together and to have discussions -- and also for less socially beneficial reasons. But the technology is just a tool for communication. By itself, it's neither good nor bad. Of course, given how those tools have been useful in larger protests and even regime changes around the Middle East over the past 18 months, one might guess that this new crackdown is a bit more about safeguarding the power of the existing government.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: crackdown, kuwait, social media
Companies: facebook, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seriously????
Of course they need to regulate social networks. You can't repress your people properly if they are allowed to communicate freely with no fear of punishment.
LOL That's the type of society they want to safeguard, scared sheeple. Good luck with that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seriously????
Wait, what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
step 1: read the freakin' article, make a comment relevant to it
step 2: ???
Step 3: profit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not much interest because...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm so glad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm so glad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm so glad...
Don't be fooled. These Arab Spring movements are not about democracy. This theme was created by Western media. It is about a global recession, government debt, and youth unemployment. Governments can enforce obedience (with the army), or they can buy it (with government entitlement programs). When 20-somethings are out of work, both Dictatorships and Democracies (Greece) will fall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I'm so glad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I'm so glad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shouldn't we regulate the Telephone, Printing Press?
Think of the children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OMG!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if it was up to me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cohesiveness-or repression
They don't like the idea of their power being challenged, so it figures that they have to get rid of anything or control those things that might lead people to think for themselves.
If unchecked, it will lead to events such as happening in Syria-mass murder by the government to stomp out any kind of rebellion. It may yet come to that, anyway.
Absolute dictatorships have a nasty way of getting even with dissidents and other pesky people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They're not safeguarding cohesiveness of society
The inhibition of communication necessarily destabilizes societal cohesiveness. But preventing the proliferation of new communication maintains the existing level of cohesion.
If they cared about societal cohesiveness, they'd make free and uninhibited communication the new status quo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]