Fan-Made Movie Edits: Another Cultural Loss At The Hands Of Copyright
from the a-loss-to-society dept
I missed this when it was in the news a few months back, but actor Topher Grace (That 70s Show and a bunch of other stuff) apparently decided he wanted to learn how film editing works, and rather than make his own film and edit it, he decided to take some other films that he knew well, and see what would happen if he edited them (massively). His first project was taking Episodes I, II and III of Star Wars -- a total of approximately seven hours of footage -- and editing them down to a tight 85-minute film that focuses almost exclusively on the story of how Anakin becomes Darth Vader, completely wiping out lots of other stuff, but (according to some of the very small number of people who saw it) creating a really compelling storyline in the process.In a recent interview, he expanded a bit on the reason he did this and what his thinking was. Basically, he said that it's similar to when a director takes acting lessons to better understand actors (but with no desire to be one). He's not planning to do video editing professionally, but he believes editing is the key part of how a video story is told, and he wanted to understand it more. As he said:
There's this expression that [a movie is] written three times: during the script, when you're filming it and when you're editing it. And I believe that's wrong. I think it's written once, in editing -- and everything is clay for that. And I wanted to learn about it -- I thought it would be neat. It's like learning to play the piano and I need a lot of clay. And I thought if I did one movie out of these three ...But, here's the thing. You and I and everyone else -- other than the small group of folks Grace invited to his screening -- will never see this movie. He's promised never to show it, because he doesn't want to upset Lucasfilm or violate their copyrights. Of course, Lucasfilm has actually been pretty cool about allowing such fan edits, but others in the industry, led by the MPAA, have not. And, of course, it seems that even just the one screening that Grace had for his friends in the industry and some reporters almost certainly violated Lucasfilm's copyrights on the work.
And Grace isn't stopping there either. He plans to do more of these, starting with an edit from the various versions of Close Encounters -- but again, none of us will ever get to see it:
I think, for people who like to edit, this is a cool way to do it. And it's just a great community thing. But they'll never be on YouTube, or any of that stuff.And that, to me, sounds like a pretty big loss. Fan edits and remixes of music are pretty popular and widely encouraged by artists these days. But, for whatever reason, the same viewpoint doesn't seem to extend much to movies (again, Lucasfilm is a slight, but not complete, exception). And, for the most part, it seems that not just allowing but encouraging the making and sharing of fan edits would be a great way to not just have fans even more engaged in the films, but also to introduce new audiences to films, and to give people more reasons to watch the originals again, just to compare them to some fan edits.
So here's a situation where we have someone doing something incredibly cool and creating a bit of culture that those who have seen it seem to have enjoyed thoroughly. And the rest of the world will never experience it, even though it wouldn't do any harm to the original films. That seems like a huge loss to the collective culture.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: remix, star wars, topher grace
Companies: lucasfilm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No, I am not being sarcastic. It is a crime that this movie can't be shown! Copyright law in the US Constitution says it is for the progress of arts...how can there be progression of arts when you STOP the progression?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kaching
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kaching
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Kaching
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Kaching
Greed really is an ugly thing, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Kaching
Lucas is the LAST guy on the planet that needs to worry about a film making money. He's so rich from the originals that he can fund them for CASH.
He very much has the luxury of not being crass.
In the intervening years he simply lost sight of the reason he became an artist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Repeal Copyright
Never mind what it was "supposed" to be and if that's all you've got to say, just keep it to your naive selves because you have nothing of value to say.
Copyright as it exists these days is abusive of the masses, evil and fatal to progress.
Rollback is a joke. Repeal Copyright for the sake of the future. If need be, replace it with something that fulfills the original intent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
AC comment was mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New Copyright System
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New Copyright System
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All he did was take someone else's work, and show you how HE saw it. It's not some great new work, it's just someone else's work with his fingers on it. Nothing more and nothing less.
This isn't a problem of copyright - this is a problem of common sense. The guy knew from the get go that nothing would come of this. Why cry now?
Sorry, but this isn't anything other that someone hoping that a copyright holder would ignore them because they are somewhat famous or whatever. It fails, and it always will. Culture doesn't lose anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Isn't that all art?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't be so hard on George Lucas. We all know his last 3 Star Wars movies are a lame and uninspired mess. It's true we can't blame copyright for that - it was more a lack of common sense, like you say. The point of this post is that fans like Topher Grace can fix those mistakes, and we could all benefit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Culturally, this is a dead end. If the original movies are lame and uninspired, then ignore them and move on, making movies that are neither. Re-editing his work because you don't happen to like it doesn't really add much to anything.
It's rather lame and uninspired, if you ask me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Anyway, the point is taking pieces from one thing and creating something new. This is the foundation of all art and culture. All. Art. And. Culture.
Speaking of TV Tropes, it's a great site to go to if you want to be disabused of the notion that a movie/tv show/book is completely original.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Kurosawa Principle
Jedi hangs his head in shame...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whooosh...
In your town, there are a bunch of rich old farts in fancy clothes all sitting around being pretentious about how high minded and culturally educated they are. They are all doing it while watching to or listening to the kind of performance you're describing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And these modern movie companies. Man. Why can't they create their own stories rather than stealing the hard work from writers and other creators?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Wait... we're talking about Disney now? I thought this was about Star Wars and Topher Grace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You should probably also go rail at anyone who even remotely plays anything that could be considered "blues". Bunch of b@stards, playing riffs created decades ago and just adding a little chord change here or there to make them "different".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You can't be serious. Have you ever been involved in a creative endeavor that didn't "piddle" around with something that's gone before on some level?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ask and you shall receive. But it is better to ask Google than ask us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Somebody could then write a program that reads the script and apply them to the source material, showing the parts in the scripted order.
That would also allow other fans to alter the script and build upon the work by the original editor.
Just a thought...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's rather lame and uninspired, if you ask me."
It is good that you have an opinion on this cultural artifact and decided to share it. That only proves that it is in fact culture.
Remember that music video that everyone links to as a joke/ internet meme? That video's pretty lame and horrible right? and yet the video is a pretty big part of our culture and has been for quite some time...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If it's culture, it's mold.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I am not sure how to interpret this line. Very odd.
Pointing at something and calling it "culture" doesn't make it so. I cannot see how, as a people, we are advanced enough by someones reedit of a lucas film as to merit tossing copyright out of the window to permit it.
You are right. However, the oposite can also be true. "Pointing at something and saying it is not culture doesn't make it so."
The problem is that you do not have a clue what culture is. Culture is the collective rise of art, intellect, speech etc. Star Wars is part of modern culture regardless of what you or George Lucas want people to believe. If you have ever seen a staged lightsabre dual video or a bounty hunter cosplay, you would know this. Creating fan edits and mashups of cultural works is part of the spread of such culture.
By placing such long and lopsided copyrights on culture, it is like trying to build a dam after a flood.
We are often asked by certain ACs here (who knows, it might actually be used) that if the lengths of copyright were the problem, why is it only new works that get pirated. The answer is that the new works are part of the internet age's collective culture. The older works that should be in the public domain if not for term extensions are not part of the internet age's collective culture.
Those people were robbed of their culture. They wer denied the right to promulgate and expand on their culture. The current internet age will not stand by and let that happen.
Does this suck for dinosaurs that do not get it and want to fight it? Sure. But they will come to terms with it and take advantage of it, or else they will die off and be replaced by those that do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No they were not. If they were robbed of their culture, they wouldn't have it. Clearly, it wouldn't be culture if they didn't.
Stop talking in circles, you are only showing that your logic is very, very light.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If we had it we'd be able to play around with it however the hell we wanted. But we can't because it's still stuck in the vice of a government monopoly.
But you know that's exactly what he meant and you're just trolling. Really I should know better than to feed you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Society has decided that Star Wars is a part of it's culture, despite your objections.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fan media & copyright
Well first there IS a specific reason, to wit: Usually the artists don't wn their own copyights - particularly in arenas like music and movies - they sell those rights to huge media MANUFACTURERS (hold that thought it's important...) thus making them the equivalent of share croppers on their own cultural land. Even though they are (relatively) well paid they must give up their copyrights inorder to get their art in front of a mass audience. This is because until the internet mass media ALWAYS involved mass, 19-century industrial revolution style manufacturing which entailed large capital investments to build and run the factories. What the media conglomerate have forgotten/confused is that people don't buy books, CDs, DVDs, whatever because they want the artifact. They buy it because they want the content. They are protecting a dead business model. This is like a food retailer thinking that people go to the grocery story and buy canned green beans so they can have the f***ing can the beans came in.
In addition to this huge mistake, because they were focused on manufacturing, they also have missed the fact that cultural production has a COMPLETELY different economic imperative. They're protecting the wrong thing! But I don't have time to talk about that right now so until the next time one of these blog posts makes me foam at the mouth...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]