Google's Latest Transparency Report Shows Increased Censorship From Governments Not Normally Known For Censorship

from the not-cool dept

Tue, Jun 19th 2012 8:19am — Mike Masnick

Google has continued to update its big "Transparency Report" with new data on specific content takedown requests from government agencies. With this latest update, Google has put out a blog post warning people that governments -- including those not normally associated with censorship -- are increasingly seeking to shut down speech for what appear to be politically motivated reasons:

We noticed that government agencies from different countries would sometimes ask us to remove political content that our users had posted on our services. We hoped this was an aberration. But now we know it’s not.

This is the fifth data set that we’ve released. And just like every other time before, we’ve been asked to take down political speech. It’s alarming not only because free expression is at risk, but because some of these requests come from countries you might not suspect—Western democracies not typically associated with censorship.

For example, in the second half of last year, Spanish regulators asked us to remove 270 search results that linked to blogs and articles in newspapers referencing individuals and public figures, including mayors and public prosecutors. In Poland, we received a request from a public institution to remove links to a site that criticized it. We didn’t comply with either of these requests.

There are some interesting, if odd, specific examples, like the following:

Brazil: In December, we received an electoral court order that resulted in the removal of four orkut profiles for content related to political campaigns.

Canada: We received a request from the Passport Canada office to remove a YouTube video of a Canadian citizen urinating on his passport and flushing it down the toilet. We did not comply with this request.

Pakistan: We received a request from the Government of Pakistan's Ministry of Information Technology to remove six YouTube videos that satirized the Pakistan Army and senior politicians. We did not comply with this request.

Poland: We received a request from the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development to remove a search result that criticized the agency as well as eight more that linked to it. We did not comply with this request.

Spain: We received 14 requests from the Spanish Data Protection Authority to remove 270 search results that linked to blogs and sites referencing individuals and public figures. The Spanish Data Protection Authority also ordered the removal of three blogs published on Blogger and three videos hosted on YouTube. We did not comply with these requests.

United States: We received a request from a local law enforcement agency to remove a blog because of a post that allegedly defamed a law enforcement official in a personal capacity. We did not comply with this request, which we have categorized in this Report as a defamation request.

We received a request from a local law enforcement agency to remove 1,400 YouTube videos for alleged harassment. We did not comply with this request. Separately, we received a request from a different local law enforcement agency to remove five user accounts that allegedly contained threatening and/or harassing content. We terminated four of the accounts, which resulted in the removal of approximately 300 videos, but did not remove the remaining account with 54 videos.

We received a court order to remove 218 search results that linked to allegedly defamatory websites. We removed 25% of the results cited in the request.

This expansion of governments seeking to censor speech via Google takedowns is clearly worrisome, though it's good to see that Google at least investigates the details before taking down the content.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: brazil, canada, censorship, pakistan, poland, spain, transparency report
Companies: google, youtube

30 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

arcan, 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:28am

google is one of 2 companies i sorta trust. the other is valve. that is just cause hats though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 11:28am
  
  Re:
  I used to then I realized the CIA and NSA helped put forth the initial capital for Google and maintain some of its stock.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nellius, 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:33am

The really worrying thing is that only a company on google's level could realistically hire enough people to scrutinise these requests before complying. Smaller companies would have little choice but to censor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:56am
  
  Re:
  Another worrying thing is that other companies haven't come out and reported on what the government is making them remove or reveal. I hope Google continues to set the bar high.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lowestofthekeys (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:33am

And the AC trolls wonder why people here are on edge for legislation that puts tools like takedown requests into the hands of the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mason Wheeler, 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:15am
  
  Re:
  Not at all. The government already has all the takedown tools they need. (See: ICE censoring websites.) But that at least involves the legal process, and can be challenged. What people are on edge about is legislation that moves takedown powers further into the hands of private individuals *outside* the moderating effects of the justice system.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 11:26pm
    
    Re: Re:
    ICE and legal process? Really?...can you spell Megaupload and Dajaz1?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 11:26pm
    
    Re: Re:
    ICE and legal process? Really?...can you spell Megaupload and Dajaz1?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ilfar, 20 Jun 2012 @ 12:36am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You know, in the internet age we really need to find retire that form of sarcasm... It just does not work as effectively in text-based conversations...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Torg (profile), 20 Jun 2012 @ 4:14am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Wow. What a brilliant and reasonable idea. You've convinced me to completely give up sarcasm in Internet conversations.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
silverscarcat (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:38am

Again, this just proves that if Google takes over the world, you know that they'll do a good job of running it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mr. Oizo, 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:19am
  
  Re:
  Ah, bullshit. Power corrupts. Only by placing all the cards on the table can someone be trusted. In this case, google doesn't put all its cards on the table, it mainly draws attention to the cards of others.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:54am
    
    Re: Re:
    thats a joke right?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Torg (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 12:21pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Even given that you're right about their motives, Google is still setting a good example. If everyone put each other's cards on the table, everyone's cards would be on the table.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - silverscarcat (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 12:59pm
    
    Re: Re:
    One common saying among people on the internet...
    
    "you know Google's trying to take over the world. We don't care. We know they'd do a good job at it."
    
    Better than Facebook ever could at least.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 8:51am

the problem is far worse than just Google. all countries are introducing/have introduced new legislation giving the right to spy on every single citizen, in every single way possible, concerning every aspect of their lives, including now being able to read physical letters. this has, in my opinion, all come from the over-reaction by the USA governments to 9/11 and the forcing of that over-reaction on to all countries. although this was just about the most horrendous and deplorable attack on anyone that could ever happen, those that carried out that attack have achieved their aim. everyone is shit scared of what happened, happening again. now everyone has to suffer!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- lucidrenegade (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:24am
  
  Re:
  "this has, in my opinion, all come from the over-reaction by the USA governments to 9/11 and the forcing of that over-reaction on to all countries."
  
  I think that governments, especially the US, were just looking for an excuse to increase their control of their citizens. 9/11 was the excuse they needed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:24pm
    
    9/11 excuse
    which is why several top US national security and foreign and domestic policy officials had a stated preference in writing and sworn testimony that a major attack on America was NECESSARY as being VITAL to "US interests".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- weneedhelp (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:43am
  
  Re:
  "everyone is shit scared of what happened"
  
  Nah. Go to NY around 9/11. The security theater ramps up and New Yorkers are like ahh its that 9-11 thing again.
  
  Just to point out what a joke their security is, Sept-6, 7, 8, & 9... nothing out of the norm, but Sept 10th rolls around and all of a sudden there are cops on every corner with their "roadblocks" and such. I guess potential terrorists wouldnt think to go there a week before. Its stupid really.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 11:29am
  
  Re:
  tl;dr Governments want to be Facebook, only with more spam.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:03am

Where's bob when you need him? For once, he's right when he calls Google "Big Search" but here, its Big Search for all the right reasons. Now Google lets us know exactly how corrupt multiple democratic governments are acting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:16am

"We received a court order to remove 218 search results that linked to allegedly defamatory websites. We removed 25% of the results cited in the request."

How does Google decide to only comply with a portion of a court order? Did they fight to overturn the order, or did they face contempt of court penalties? Or are they outside of the jurisdiction of the court, and only censored the 25% according to their own policies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:45am
  
  Re:
  The probably did the unthinkable and actually reviewed the site in question first before pulling the search results.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chargone (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:52am
  
  Re:
  probably more like the rest were the sort of nonsense court order where the proper response is to contest it, or are not filed properly, or are invalid due to whatever protections are in place for such things (safe harbours, constitutional thingies *shrugs* not like i'm a lawyer or a US citizen...)
  
  also possibly jurisdictional issues. the US is not the only government to completely fail to understand the concept of Borders when it comes to law enforcement as it relates to the internet, but it's certainly the worst. (which is even more amusing when you realise that US companies are some of the worst offenders when it comes to region-locking stuff on the internet...)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:54am
  
  Re:
  IANAL, but I'd imagine that they submit a declaration or similar to the court, detailing the history of the court order, the individuals or offices involved in the review, and an itemized explanation of each refusal, citing the legal basis.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Watchit (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 9:35am

"Western democracies not typically associated with censorship."

Wait, what? Which ones are those? I thought those were just a myth!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Almost Anonymous (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 10:08am

Something missing
I'm waiting patiently for Bing's and Yahoo's Transparency reports...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 19 Jun 2012 @ 1:11pm
  
  Re: Something missing
  Oh they're using the Ron Kirk definition of transparent: so transparent it's invisible.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
beltorak, 19 Jun 2012 @ 7:04pm

Waiting for the Backlash
So when will the court orders to stop publishing this information start rolling in? I bet some companies would argue "trade secrets" and governments would argue "national security"...

Maybe it will come in the form of takedown request? fat lotta good that would do, but it would be funny to see in the takedown report...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2012 @ 11:35pm

The Government controls all the traditional media and now wants to control the free flow of info beyond that.
Prior to the internet we would have not known that these types of "takedowns" were even happening.
Censorship? By our Government...Of course not.At least not before the printing press.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]