OxyContin Being Tested On Kids... So Drugmaker Can Get 6 More Months Of Patent Protection
from the skewed-priorities dept
Want a sense of just how screwed up the incentives of our patent system are today? Purdue Pharma, the makers of the highly addictive painkiller OxyContin, is now running clinical tests to get the FDA to approve its use for kids as young as 6-years-old. Why? Because the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act section 505A includes a little "gift": if drugmakers conduct clinical studies for their drugs with kids, they can get six more months of patent protection. So even if they don't even sell OxyContin to six year olds, just securing the extended patent, thanks to the massive monopoly rents given to drugs still on patent, Purdue is likely to profit massively. Lots of people are reasonably troubled by this:“They are doing (the pediatric trial) for patent exclusivity, there’s no doubt about it in my mind — not out of largesse,” said Dr. Elliot Krane, director of pain management at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif. “That’s important for their bottom line.”Of course, some will argue that if this provides better drug availability to kids, and those drugs really help the kids, then perhaps this isn't a bad thing. But, no matter what, the incentives here are highly questionable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: clinical trials, drug patents, fda, oxycontin
Companies: purdue pharma
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe not so funny
And don't tell me about "child proof packaging", please...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe not so funny
hell, years back when they started making those child proof lighters.....a woman I worked with couldnt get her lighter working, her 7yo daughter use to light her smokes for her....
thankfully she quit smoking eventually because I really think it was teaching her daughter a bad lesson about smoking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Small Error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Small Error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Young
Works for drugs, cigarettes, politics, and religions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Young
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Young
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the kids!
"Oh crap, Viagra is coming off patent protection! What are we going to do?"
"Quick, form up a test group of kids, we'll be able to get six more months!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the kids!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Try not to do the 'wall of text' thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/03/pharma-company-studying-oxycontins-effect-in-chil dren/
If your child had severe burns, and you had the choice of giving them Oxycontin to remove the pain entirely, or giving them lesser pain meds and them still being in pain, what would you choose?
Now, I'm not saying Purdue is doing this out of the goodness of their hearts (more like to increase their wallets), but its not a bad thing that they're doing this testing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That happens more than you'd think, and Purdue isn't even the worst of it. Fun fact: patent or no patent, Mallinckrodt also makes a generic form of OxyContin. But Mallinckrodt is also the company that makes Methadone, which is what you use to treat opioid addiction. So they profit on it both ways!
Gotta agree, though. Testing OxyContin on kids is a crime against humanity, on par with just about anything Monsanto's done. St. Paul had it right when he wrote that the love of money is the root of all evil.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
or this:
...or any of it for that matter.
Or figure out the math:
$2.8 Billion / 2 = $1.4 Billion
I suppose you think that the physicians and "opioid" experts are just spreading FUD. Do you troll?
p.s. I am not a doctor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Medical Marijuana is a pain medicine and it's not physically addictive, so you're wrong. Go on, admit it. You are wrong.
Go on . . . you can do it . . . thought not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and then accurately explain those effects to their physician
and then that physician accurately understanding what that child is telling them
..and to begin conducting these experiments a year before the patent expires. how long has oxy been used for pain management?
this is fubar'd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
>> not improve the bottom line profits?
No one that matters is going to care.
It's a legal loophole in the system, and as long as the right palms are greased and beaks wetted, it's going to continue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is your kid on Drugs
I would much rather they allow them to use marijuana for pain control.
The manufactures of this little miracle weed don't need patent protections,are not afraid of the competition
and don't seem to worry about their bottom line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is your kid on Drugs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And as for everyone getting bent out of shape over the particular drug, that's ridiculous. Doctors can and DO prescribe narcotic pain killers to children, including OxyContin. If the child is in excruciating pain, it would be terribly cruel not to. And they do it WITHOUT studies exploring the optimal dosage, timing, and side-effects. The whole point is to determine out with limited, carefully observed testing what those are. No doubt that opioid painkillers, particularly ones like OxyContin, ought to have a higher threshold of "need" for children than adults, but without exploring the effects, how are we to know what that is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
secondly: Opioids! They include some real nasties. In general it is not something any doctor should use on children if they can avoid it. Getting an opioid approved for children is a slippery slope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Given this and the further fact that PAIN is an essential feedback to let you know that something isn't right or needs further healing is problematic as children are not developed sufficiently to make proper decisions about what should and should not be masked. Opiates mask that pain and can lead to excessive overuse of whatever is damaged which leads to longer recovery times and/or further damage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: tech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: tech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everyone seems to be aware of the highly addictive nature of Oxy. Keeping the patent extended, for even 6 months, will keep the generics from manufacturing it, thus keeping it a little harder to get your hands on.
Once the Generics start making Oxy too, well, availability goes up, and street price goes down.
Again, in this one instance, I would support extending the patent for the betterment of society.
Now, can someone please make some Children's Chewable Barbiturates in cheap gummy form so I can stop paying the babysitter?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:Methadone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screw the patent and copyright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Screw the patent and copyright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is OxyContin addictive? Yes. However, addiction starts when the drug is being abused. There's a difference between addiction and TOLERANCE, which occurs when a body gets used to having the drug, so it needs more for it to become effective.
Does anyone really think a 10-year-old will start snorting their OxyContin to get high? Hopefully, if in the correct household, they won't. You don't become addicted if you take your medication in the way it's prescribed.
I'm a nurse on a surgical floor, where we hand out narcotic pain killers all the time, by the way, so I know what I'm talking about.
I don't really see the problem with testing it on kids. See how they do with it. In certain cases, it would be absolutely appropriate to prescribe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sorry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]