Author Of Book About Android UI Told He Needs To Get Copyright Signoffs To Use Any App Screenshots
from the fair-use? dept
We've talked in the past about just how ridiculous publishers are when it comes to doing something like quoting a song in a book. The publishers apparently have no appetite for standing up for the fair use rights of their authors, so they just refuse unless you get a license for absolutely everything, even when it's clearly and obviously fair use. In the latest example of this kind of insanity, it appears that Wiley -- a publisher who already has a reputation as a maximalist -- is telling the author of a book about Android's UI, Juhani Lehitmaki, that he can't rely on fair use to post screenshots of any apps. Instead, it's requiring that he get approval from each and every app developer. Lehitmaki has gone on Google+ seeking permission from a long list of developers:I need a little bit help with my book stuff and thought to ask it from all of you awesome people here at G+. I'm in a bit difficult situation in the finishing it. I have been in belief that using screenshots of apps as examples of the platform functionality is covered under fair use but apparently I was wrong.He then lists out 22 apps (down to 21 once he got permission from one):
So now I need to acquire permission to use screenshot of different apps I've used so I can keep them in. So if you or someone you know are the copyright holder of any of the following brands / apps or know who to contact please let me know.
* Google android appsHe notes that all of the screenshots are used as examples of good UI design and are clearly credited. In other words, in each case, the app is portrayed positively.
* SPB Shell 3D (by SPB Software)
* SlideIT Keyboard (by DASUR LTD.)
* Siine Keyboard (by Siine Ltd)
* GO Launcher (by GO LAUNCHER DEV TEAM)
* Evernote android apps
* Twitter android app
* Gameloft android apps
* Tiny Flashlight + LED (by Nikolay Ananiev)
* Able Remote (by ENTERTAILION LLC)
* TED (by TED Conferences)
* Gigbeat - Concerts (by GIGBEAT, INC.)
* TouristEye - Travel Guide (by Tourist Eye)
* Winamp android app
* Pulse News (by ALPHONSO LABS)
* Songkick Concerts (by SONGKICK.COM, INC.)
* Prixing - Scanner & comparer (by PRIXING)
* Catch Notes Notepad (by Catch.com)
* Sony, Android skin
* Samsung, Android skin
* HTC, Android skin
[edit: removed the ones I'm already in contact with. Thank you!]
Here's the thing: he should be pissed off at Wiley for totally failing him as a publisher and being obnoxiously unwilling to stand up for their author. Using screenshots in this manner is fair use. No question. I can't see how any intellectually honest person could go through the four factor test and not find that using screenshots in a book like this are fair use. Wiley should back up their author, but they don't, because they're too scared of a lawsuit and apparently don't have the guts to stand up for fair use rights. It's shameful, and should be a warning to any author not to sign on with Wiley. Why bother signing on with a publisher who makes you go through a silly wasteful exercise like this?
In fact, I'd imagine that many of the app developers are similarly inconvenienced by this process of now having to give Juhani permission. Of course they want their apps featured, but now they have to fill out some sort of release or license just to make Wiley's lawyers happy. This process inconveniences absolutely everyone. Wiley should be ashamed.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: android, copyright, fair use, juhani lehitmaki, publishers, screenshots
Companies: wiley
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kickstart
This is not as true as it used to be. At most schools there is a trend to give more weight to the impact of a book than its publisher.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kickstart
Given the new publicity he's received, he could likely give the finger (see: Galileo) to his publishers and just announce he's publishing via "x"...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kickstart
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Worse than Not Standing up to Fair Use
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait, I don't get it
Instead, it's requiring that he get approval from each and every app developer.
If they are so insistent on the need to "license" all those app screenshots, why can't they do it themselves? Dicks, I say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, I don't get it
Ahh. I see you don't understand how publishers work now. For really huge authors the publishers actually provide that type of service. But for 99% of the authors, the publisher does very little except for physically printing and distributing the books. Authors generally have to do all of their own legwork and most likely do most of their own marketing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wait, I don't get it
Like the record labels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, I don't get it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, I don't get it
It's hard to find the right person to get that kind of approval from - I suspect most of those companies don't yet have the right person to get that approval from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even public domain quotes are a problem with some publishers. Some require specific evidence of public domain. But I understand that one of my English Department colleges was given a list of required sign-offs that included William Shakespeare. That is going to be a tough one.
I know of at least one person who went the self-publishing route in part because of the impossibility of getting all of the clearances needed for his text. With tools like lulu.com self-publishing is becoming a very viable option. Publishers in some fields need to get over their insane fear of fair-use lawsuits if they want to hold onto the academic publishing market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm all, look lady, are you seriously going to worry about the possibility of being sued over similarities between two 45-year-old songs? You don't think Sly might have noticed the similarities in, say, 1966? Or that he'd be barred from suing now? We're talking about two fairly big hits, by musicians who likely knew each other ...
... And they never got back, even though we were perfectly willing to give them the license.
FUD
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Codes of fair use "best practices"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the "law of unintended consequences" department
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the "law of unintended consequences" department
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: From the "law of unintended consequences" department
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's 20-effing-12 fcs!
Someone please kill of the previous 3 centuries (with their idiotic made-up "laws" [I mean come one - you couldn't even walk on a street without being knee-deep in road-apples waaaaaaaay back then], plus all the evil money-grubbers and their lawyers) once and for all so we can get on with the modern age!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks
Thanks for picking up the topic and all the support. I'm pretty stumped by the issue. As an author there's not much I can do. Everyone I've been in contact from Wiley have been great and very helpful. I've got all the support I've needed. This issue seems to be just a stupid corporate policy and I hope they would change it but the people I'm working with to get the book published doesn't have a word in this issue and they must follow it. I would also like to point out that I do get support from the Wiley folks with this issue and they have not left me alone even though it is contractually my responsibility.
But I that techdirt is 100% right about the core issue. Screenshots should definitely be covered by fair use. If they weren't there would not be tech blogs & computer magazines etc. This discussion is good. I hope publishers would change their policies.
Thanks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks
I hope that TechDirt will be interested in hearing the details of how easy or difficult this whole process is for you once the book is finally published, and if there's any reaction from Wiley or the people you're working with.
"Stupid corporate policies" like this will only scare away future authors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks
Imagine a publisher that had a policy requiring you fly at your own expense to their office and do the hokey pokey before they could publish your book.
Okay...
Put your right hand in
Take your right hand out
Put your right hand in...
"Here, we'll help you move your hand. Sorry about all this, but we just don't have better way to do publishing."
Makes about as much sense, huh?
And I submit that there is something creative people can do. They can kick lickspittle middlemen to the curb, stand on their own two feet, and show spineless bureaucrats how life should be lived.
I'm not saying choices like that are easy, painless, or cheap. Freedom never is. But until more people say "enough is enough" it will only get worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks
FTFY. Hopefully the next publisher you choose are less clueless about the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
publishers have changed their position, given information
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Message recieved
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Message recieved
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Message recieved
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There, FTFY.
Sounds to me like the real solution is to drop-kick Wiley and find a real publisher.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doomed, I tell ya!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, his publisher is doing him a huge favor by not letting him try to stand on this legal head of a pin.
They may be fair use (and probably are), but any one NOT signed off on is a potential lawsuit, as someone decides to argue the fair use of it. Win or lose, the publisher understands that it's much better to get permission than it is to pay to prove your rights. Worst of all, on a bad day, a judge might actually rule against them, leaving them holding the bag.
You need to understand that in the real world, sometimes it's better to err on the side of caution than it is to be a trailblazer who gets eaten by a bear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
....I'm probably too cynical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"don't have the guts to stand up for fair use rights"
It also serves as pretty effective disinformation campaign - when even their own authors now think "they are apparently wrong" trying to rely on fair use.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I'd like to include
a screen shot of the
____ app here, but
opinions on what is
fair use vary. The
possibility of a law
suit is not worth it.
So Google it yourself."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]