Cybersecurity Act Rejected By The Senate
from the there-goes-that-one dept
Over the last few days, it became clear that the big Cybersecurity Act in the Senate almost certainly didn't have the votes to pass. However, with all the negotiating and horse trading going on, there was still the possibility on some sort of "deal." Unfortunately, it seemed like the push for a deal also meant a push towards weakening the privacy protections. In the end, there was no deal, and no Cybersecurity Act this time around, as the vote in the Senate failed to reach the 60 vote threshold necessary for cloture (basically to continue moving the bill forward).This certainly doesn't mean that any cybersecurity legislation is dead. There likely will be other attempts to get something through -- either something much less complex in this lame duck session, or (more likely) a bigger effort next year. The bill failed, in part, because some businesses were worried about it creating too many regulations for them. I still think it should have failed for failing to explain why it was actually needed. The good news, however, is that this latest version of the bill definitely took privacy concerns more seriously -- and the support for the Franken/Paul amendment would have made privacy safeguards even stronger. Hopefully this means that when the next attempt at cybersecurity comes through, that the baseline will include strong privacy safeguards. I'll have some more thoughts later on what Congress should do if it really wants to pass a cybersecurity bill, but for now, this version of the bill is dead.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cybersecurity, cybersecurity act, privacy, regulations, senate
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There is no shortage of poorly thought out and written bills.
There is also no shortage of clueless politicians to push these pathetic attempts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Keep your guns loaded ppl, next attempt is lurking in the shadows just waiting for our weakness.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Banks killed it
"In a letter Wednesday to Senate leaders, nine industry groups, including the American Bankers Association and
the Financial Services Roundtable, argued that the bill would add a layer of inconsistent and potentially
duplicative regulation for financial firms."
American Banker
"Industry Groups Oppose Senate Cyber-Security Bill"
By Kevin Wack
2 August 2012
Sorry, I don't have a link. I get this from an internal company site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Guns Loaded
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Guns Loaded
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Banks killed it
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Vote: 52 for and 46 against (with 2 not voting)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Speaker: Then it is unanimous, we are going to approve the bill to evacuate the town of Springfield in the great state of—
Congressman: Wait a second, I want to tack on a rider to that bill – $30 million of taxpayer money to support the perverted arts.
Speaker: All in favor of the amended Springfield-slash-pervert bill? [entire Congress boos] Bill defeated. [gavel]
Kent Brockman: I've said it before and I'll say it again: democracy simply doesn't work. repost ==> /.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I hate this Government and want it out of my life.
Take your mindless controlling loss of Rights Bills and shove em up your ass Politicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Guns Loaded
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Guns Loaded
Human nature abhors a power vacuum, to borrow a well-known phrase. I'm not aware of any time in the history of any civilization in which a period of anarchy (the absence of a strong ruling power of some sort) was not marked by strife and bloodshed as multiple factions attempted to claim the #1 spot.
Any social organization you can think of that consists of more than a handful of members is either organized in a very specific way, or it falls apart quickly. That specific way is the pattern of human nature, the pattern of an extended human family. It's essentially shaped like a pyramid.
Every organization, be it families, social clubs, businesses, churches, political parties or entire nations, has a pyramid-shaped hierarchy in some form. The details vary wildly, but the fundamental structure does not.
There have been some groups that consciously attempt to subvert this structure, most recently the Occupy Wall Street movement. If they're notable for anything, it tends to be for their failure to actually accomplish anything. This is not a coincidence.
So you can dream of "productive anarchy" if you want, but in real life no such thing has ever existed, nor will it without a fundamental shift in human nature.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gun control attempt helped sink it
nice try chuck. Very sleazy attempt by the Democrats to try and slip something like this buy, obviously trying to ride the emotional wave from the Aurora, CO incident.
http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Guns Loaded
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guns Loaded
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The quicker we get so corrupt and generally fucked up that the average Joe can't easily ignore it, the quicker we can do something about it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Gun control attempt helped sink it
You know, to protect unborn cyberchildren and shit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]