New Minister Of Culture In Brazil Brings Hope Of Return To Earlier Enlightened Copyright Policy

from the back-to-the-future dept

Fri, Sep 21st 2012 12:12am — Glyn Moody

As Techdirt observed back in 2007, Brazilian artists were some of the first to recognize that piracy can be a positive force that helps get the word out about their creations. That was part of a larger openness to new ideas about copyright that was symbolized by the appointment of the well-known Brazilian musician Gilberto Gil as Minister of Culture, a post he held from 2003 until 2008. However, more recently, things have gone into reverse on the copyright front. Ana de Hollanda, the Minister of Culture appointed by the current President, ordered the CC license to be removed from the Ministry of Culture's website, and there were indications that harsher copyright laws were coming.

Now, in something of a shock move, de Hollanda has been dismissed according to this report by infojustice.org:

Ana de Hollanda has been on shaky grounds since she appointed. Her first words were to say she would review the Copyright Law Reform in order to "protect the author" from what she saw as an attack on their rights and its exercise. By that she meant the expansion of the limitations, the supervision of the Collective Management Organization and the institutionalization of the equivalent to a Copyright Office with consulting, mediation and possibly arbitration powers.

As the article points out, there are signs that de Hollanda's successor, Marta Suplicy, may return to the more enlightened policies of Gil and the President who appointed him, known popularly as "Lula". Moreover, Lula's successor, President Dilma Rousseff, has also talked about widening access to culture in her country: It is important to note that, when taking office in 2011, the President Dilma established 13 directives which were priorities for the Government. Among them, the 11th, there is an explicit statement on "democratization of access to cultural goods". One of the most important ways of achieving such goal is strengthening the copyright limitations and exceptions by opening up the system.
It's too early to tell whether the new Minister of Culture will make that happen, but the signs are looking better than they have for a while.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ana de hollanda, brazil, copyright, culture, gilberto gil, marta suplicy

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 1:44am

Glyn, opinions are not facts

"One of the most important ways of achieving such goal is strengthening the copyright limitations and exceptions by opening up the system."

The same thing could be accomplished by opening more libraries or approving more over the air TV channels. You are taking this guy's opinion and trying to make it sound like fact. It's not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lurk-a-lot (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 1:55am
  
  Re:
  And you are making it seem like Glyn said this rather than simply quoting President Rousseff.
  
  Anyhow, it's less an opinion, but more a directive to her government.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 4:06am
    
    Re: Re:
    No, actually it's the article he is quoting that is saying this, not specifically the President.
    
    It should also be noted that this President has changed cabinet members (and ideas) fairly often. I wouldn't count on this appointment meaning anything more than a shuffle for the sake of shuffling.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 4:16am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Actually she said that. I watched that live ;))
      
      Also, it's not for the sake of shuffling. It's a political move because Marta Suplicy gave up trying to run for S�o Paulo Prefecture so Fernando Haddad could run for it. As a consolation prize she got the Culture Ministry.
      
      I do expect her to be better than her predecessor though for my experience as a citizen of S�o Paulo during her mandate. She has a tendency to really do what's best for the poorer (as she did during her mandate) and opening up copyright and allowing culture to spread is on par with that philosophy. Also, she has a son called Supla who is a singer himself and as far as I know he is the type of artist that couldn't care less with copyright so this should influence her.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 5:31am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Umm did she say all of it, or just the first part?
        
        I can't find the full quote anywhere... I can see the president talking about "Among them, the 11th, there is an explicit statement on "democratization of access to cultural goods". " but I can't find the direct quote of " One of the most important ways of achieving such goal is strengthening the copyright limitations and exceptions by opening up the system."
        
        Care to share a link with the rest of us, because the story is lacking entirely in substance on that level.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 6:21am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It's actually a good question. I don't know exactly how you translate what she said. The translation for copyrights is not literal too, a literal translation from the Portuguese words "direitos autorais" is "authoring rights". I can try and fetch the Portuguese version but I'm fairly sure that this was the best translation the story could give.
        
        The linked article is dead on on what's happening here and the translations are as good as possible: http://infojustice.org/archives/27320
        
        Also, that article links to Dilma's Governmental Directives in which you have:
        
        11. Valorizar a cultura nacional, dialogar com outras culturas, democratizar os bens culturais e favorecer a democratiza��o da comunica��o.
        
        To value national culture, dialogue with other cultures, democratize*** the cultural goods and favor the democratization of communications.
        
        *** This word is used pretty much in the same meaning as popularize (make it popular and widespread).
        
        I'm wary to say it explicitly says they will strengthen copyright limitations and exceptions but to achieve what that directive says it's the logical step and Lula had the same ideas and as we've seen under Gilberto Gil Ministry that's pretty much what was done either officially or unofficially (there's no case against file sharers and it's very limited against sharing sites as far as I know). The aberration in this process is ECAD (the collection society) they pretty much run in the opposite direction. Generally speaking the article is right on spot, both TD and Infojustice ones.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 4:10am
    
    Re: Re:
    Checkmate. The troll loses ;)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 6:08am
  
  Re:
  opinions are not facts
  
  Especially when they come from you!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 1:45am

let's hope this becomes reality. my concern would be how much pressure the new minister is able to take from the entertainment industries, particularly from the USA, and if she can be 'convinced' to follow the model set by the recent sacked minister.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 4:20am
  
  Re:
  No such a thing. The MAFIAA did 'buy' some politicians (Senator Azeredo for instance) but it's not in the current leading party (PT- Partido dos Trabalhadores) ideas to limit culture spread. If it was the other party we'd be as closed as the US (though I might be wrong).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 4:52am

As an interesting note, Brazilian Government has set up a "Public Domain" website (http://www.dominiopublico.gov.br) that makes available for free any Portuguese content that is in the public domain. It's somewhat limited for now (not movies and other mainstream content available) but it's one initiative that should be supported and praised. It is interesting that they say that it is very hard to assert that a determined work is in the public domain due to international copyright laws in their "collection policy".

There are other open culture initiatives and sites maintained by the Govt but I use this one quite frequently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 21 Sep 2012 @ 5:04am

So while America keeps degressing into a corporate lockdown of all culture, countries like Brazil are becoming progressive in promoting the use of their culture. Go figure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Not That Chris (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 6:00am
  
  Re:
  Oh Brazil, that poor, poor third world country. It's time 'Murica stepped in to help them out of the dark ages of rampant freedom.
  
  /s
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 6:26am
    
    Re: Re:
    I lol'd. The main issue Brazil is facing now (and it seems the US are on their way to face despite being an involution) is the income inequality. While we managed to bring our miserable and very poor up a notch (to the point they can now buy popular cars) so there's a much narrower gap between them and the middle class the gap between the middle class and the uber rich (not counting the billionaire but the high society) is still insanely wide. I consider a country developed when the difference in the income of the lower slice of the population is not too big when compared to the higher slice.
    
    We are walking very slowly in this sense because while the lower slice can now buy their cars the educational system is still very very deficient.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jay (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 6:55am
  
  Re:
  The problem is the 14th Amendment allows corporate speech through a misreading precedents. Kind of sad that we can't regulate the largest companies because of problems in judicial activism.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scott Mohr, 21 Sep 2012 @ 10:09am

Sure...
"Enlightened Copyright Policy" is another way of saying: "I wanna steal as much music as I can without paying for it." You can call yourself a pirate or "enlightened" all you want. I am a musical artist, and when you take my work without paying for it you steal from me, making it much harder to make a living in music, and therefor much harder to make more music. Hope all you "pirates" are proud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 21 Sep 2012 @ 10:59am
  
  Re: Sure...
  Ooh! A strawman argument generating exercise. Let me try:
  
  "I am a musical artist" is another way of saying "I make fart noises that I force others to listen to and expect them to pay me for!"
  
  See how that works? I just take anything that someone says and re-interpret it according to my bias and agenda and suddenly they're the bad guys, even if that's not actually what they said. Then I can pretend that anyone who makes reference to the statement I twisted is supportive of the twisted interpretation.
  
  We'll try it again, just for fun.
  
  "Hope all your 'pirates' are proud" is another way of saying, "I'm a goat rapist." Why would I buy your music if you're just going to spend it on acquiring goats for your sick pleasures?
  
  What? You're not a goat rapist? But I just said you are and therefore it's true because I said so! Anyone who buys your music supports goat rape! Moral panic! Think of the kids (i.e. baby goats)! Somebody pass a law!
  
  Or maybe it would be nice to have a civilized conversation instead of just throwing around strawmen and vilifying people who disagree with you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MrWilson, 21 Sep 2012 @ 11:13am
  
  Re: Sure...
  Also, if your name is Scott Mohr, obscurity, rather than copyright violation, appears to be a bigger problem. Doing a google search for "scott mohr" and "music" turns up results for a sound engineer for a 1989 album. If that's you, you don't seem to work much or to work much on projects that have your name on them. If that's not you, you seem unknown enough that nobody could violate your copyrights if they wanted to because your music just isn't out there.
  
  Do you actually know how much money you're supposedly losing due to copyright violations (based on the flawed assumption of a one-to-one lost sale ratio) or are you fighting with strawmen over a hypothetical loss you're not actually experiencing?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 11:49am
  
  Re: Sure...
  Be my guest, I solemnly swear not to listen to your work, ever.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- silverscarcat (profile), 21 Sep 2012 @ 1:12pm
  
  Re: Sure...
  Who the hell are you?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2012 @ 2:30pm
  
  Re: Sure...
  That's not possible. The usual dissenters here say that all we ever download is One Direction or whatever latest music is out there right now.
  
  Your name is nowhere in the Top 20. You're clearly not being affected.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]