Iran's Latest Aggressive Censorship Plan: Block All Audio & Video Files

from the seems-a-bit-excessive dept

It's no secret that the Iranian government has a bit of an uncomfortable relationship with the internet. First of all, it's trying to build its own internet, at which point it supposedly would like to block out that "other" internet completely. It's also pretty aggressive in censoring various sites it doesn't like. Over the past few days, it's apparently gone a step further. While there were plenty of reports about it blocking YouTube, someone who prefers to remain anonymous sent over this story, saying that Iran's Filtering Committee (IFC) has started blocking all kinds of audio-visual files, based on filetype:
Then, on October 4, 2012, the IFC began preventing files hosted on servers outside Iran from entering the country by blocking specific file extensions. At the time of writing, this policy applies to all MP3, MP4, AVI and SWF files. This kind of filtering was used after the controversial presidential elections of 2009, amidst harsh crackdowns on freedom of information, and coincides with Iran's current economic crisis and the ensuing protests.
Apparently, those blocks do not apply to those files hosted within the country -- just those from foreign sites. Still, that's a pretty extreme move: blocking all of those files takes away a significant part of the audio-visual part of the web. The article highlights a number of Iranians complaining on Twitter about how these blocks are having a severe negative impact on what they do. Still, it's yet another warning for what happens when a government can aggressively filter the internet in extreme ways.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: audio, avi, blocks, censorship, iran, mp3, mp4, swf, video


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:11am

    Look, this is all a big misunderstanding. They are just trying to adopt more up-to-date web standards:

    1- Flash is being deprecated in favour of HTML5;
    2- Instead of relying on proprietary mp3 and mp4, Iran is encouraging people to switch to ogg vorbis;
    3- And finally, instead of relying on deprecated avi, they are trying to move people towards webm.

    They are just a bit more aggressive at implementing the standards, that's all.

    /sarcasm

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    out_of_the_blue, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:12am

    No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

    So why worry about it? This is standard rabble-rousing, more of hate directed from its proper target to a largely fabricated external enemy, the "other", those backward repressive foreigners -- WHILE your own gov'ts are doing worse!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:14am

      Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

      I'm astonished. I'm actually agreeing with an usual critic? really?

      But still there's a problem with your comment. Regardless of if it will impact you or not, they are doing that to human beings, to their people. That should be a problem. We should be supporting Iranians fighting and denouncing this pile of crap.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        u know me, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:27am

        Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

        You are replying to a heartless, soulless, POS, that has no concern for other human beings.
        So why worry about it? Because WE care what happens to others no matter where they live.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:36am

          Re: Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

          "You are replying to a heartless, soulless, POS, that has no concern for other human beings."

          oob is a media executive?

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            PRMan, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:43am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

            You just figured that out...?!?

            link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        The dude, 8 Oct 2012 @ 11:50am

        Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

        Yup Ninja.
        End the iranian suffering through your facebook account (refering to denouncing, as for the supporting part if there is no political will it simply won't happen)

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Nathan F (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 11:34am

      Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

      First, they came for the Iranians but I didn't care because I didn't live in Iran.. and then my government had the bright idea "Well they are doing it.. so we can to!"

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        monkyyy, 8 Oct 2012 @ 1:38pm

        Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.

        NOOOO

        first hey came for napster, but i didnt care as i listen to music that was given away for free legally

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:14am

    I'm surprised that Iran doesn't rip every song and movie that ever came out of "America" to the highest possible quality and then post them on a massive array of servers and offer them for free to the world - maybe they think that such a move would benefit rather than hurt the US economy.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    fb39ca4, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:17am

    Can't people change the extension to .txt or something and then change it back once it is on their computer? Or are they actually inspecting the file contents?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Yakko Warner (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 12:32pm

      Re:

      You mean the same thing we've been doing to attach "potentially unsafe" spreadsheet and document files in Outlook for years?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Lin (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 5:58pm

      Re:

      Yes, changing the file extension will work for sharing/email.
      The person receiving it just changes the file back to the correct extension.
      For example - suppose I have an avi video to send to an Iranian friend. I change the file extension from ".avi" to ".abc" and send the file. Then after they receive and download it, they change the extension back to ".avi".
      Now they can watch it.

      However, that same video MUST have the correct file extension in order for it to be viewed in a website.

      SO, changing the extension will work for sending email
      but websites won't be able to show it without the correct file extension.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:17am

    Finally, an opportunity for .mkv files to spread.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    velox (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:23am

    Work arounds will be found

    Hmm. How long will it take to dust off the old method of transferring media files as text the way MIME was sent in the early days of the Internet.
    I seems governments never tire of Whack-a-Mole.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:36am

    why complain when Iran does exactly what every other country, including those supposed democratic ones are heading towards anyway? all Iran is doing is getting in first. the USA and EU wont be far behind thanks to the way politicians keep doing what they are to preserve old industry models. the irony is, politicians dont yet realise that they are playing straight into the hands of industries. as soon as they get what they want, industries will be running things, not governments, then those politicians will be as obsolete as the people are already

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 10:45am

    Politicians and their quaint ideas of technology

    Good lord. It's like they don't know anything. Ever hear of a ZIP file? How about an extensionless file that the server gives the proper MIME type to? So many trivial ways around this "block" it's pathetic.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Austin (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 11:35am

    Somewhere in Iran...

    Suspect: "Video files? What video files?! I swear all that SSH traffic really is just a lot of commands."

    Interrogator: "So you typed 9GB of commands in 2 hours?"

    Suspect: "Of course!"

    Interrogator "Um...well..."

    Because sometimes, the alibi is as ridiculous as the charge.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 12:27pm

    What the Iranians are doing is very much like the "UnityNet" of one alternate history story, where a new "Unitist" government of China and its allies create their own walled off version of the Internet called "UnityNet".

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Digitari, 8 Oct 2012 @ 12:58pm

      Re:

      Nothing is new under the sun, it's all been written before, for those that CAN read

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2012 @ 3:22pm

        Re: Re:

        "The old wheel turns, and the same spoke comes up. It's all been done before, and will be again."
        -Sherlock Holmes, The Valley Of Fear

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 1:45pm

    Morons!

    So, you change the extension, encrypt the file (or re-arrange it so it can be easily reconstituted at the receiving end, though software can probably tell that it is some sort of audio/video data), and what do they know? Are they totally blocking encrypted data, even if sent over un-encrypted http connections? Probably not. So, encrypt file, change the extension, and send it over an un-encrypted link... That should work for awhile.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Bergman (profile), 8 Oct 2012 @ 7:02pm

    Would it be blasphemy if....?

    Say someone sent an audio file of a man reciting verses from the Quran. And Iran blocked it, thus preventing the words of Mohammed from being heard. Wouldn't that be a crime in Iran?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.