Apple Publishes Petulant Non-Apology Apology To Samsung
from the you-don't-say dept
As a UK court recently ruled, Apple's UK website is required to post a notice about the court ruling that Samsung didn't copy Apple's design with its devices. Apple has now complied with a tiny link in the page footer:In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:What kind of important points? Well, all the ones about how Apple's products are awesome, while Samsung's... not so much.
And then... it reminds you that other countries have ruled completely otherwise:"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."
"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."
However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.In other words, it's the petulant Apple "complying" with the UK judge, while at the same time making sure to add a "but, but, but... the judge is really wrong -- other than the part where he likes our design."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The point of this order was to right a wrong.
It's one thing to engage in a patent lawsuit and lose.
It's another thing to engage in a patent lawsuit, go on a public rampage, damage the reputation of a competitor, and lose.
I wonder if the court would see this apology as trying to undo the damage Apple has done?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple has managed to turn technology into fashion
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And this...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
11pt Arial?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/revsorg/8125051674/sizes/o/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Apple has managed to turn technology into fashion
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 11pt Arial?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Petulant Apple
Trying to point out rulings in other countries just makes it sound like Apple is whining. Patent laws differ from country to country and Apple's attorneys/solicitors should know better than to expect that every country's courts would rule in Apple's favor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 11pt Arial?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 11pt Arial?
This is perpetuated by women telling them that size does not matter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
factually incorrect- microsoft technique
"A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc."
Where they make a comment that isn't factually incorrect but is entirely misleading. Facebook and Oracle have been doing this too. Coincidence of the anti-google? Nope.
Do you think they're going to rewrite that statement when it gets overturned in the court or on appeal? Again, nope.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And it's only because Apple keeps being a douche with their lawsuits, proprietary cables, closed in systems, and ridiculously high prices ($150 for a 16GB music player).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Petulant Apple
That's trademark you're thinking of. This was not a trademark case, it was patents.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple is looking terrible all around
Disregarding the technical merits of the comments, the tone of them is similar to the ad and makes Apple sound weak & scared. You'd think Apple could afford a decent PR person to help handle these matters.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Where's your sense of humor?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Same or different?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The hipsters would be using zPods and zPhones.
(z = Zune)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1717.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Dr Sheldon Cooper, in the flashback-to-2002 episode of The Big Bang Theory.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wasn't apology, wasn't supposed to be
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If we go back to the original order from the Appelate judge the order states that they have to state paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the "apology page".
The court specifically placed both of those paragraphs together. Apple in their infinite egotism has now expanded them and absolutely diluted the order. This smacks of contempt and Samsung hopefully will bring this to the courts attention. Though I fervently hope the court will do this on their own initiative now.
If Apple wanted to add condescending and hyperbolic opinion to the page afterwards they should of done it after the original ordered statement was shown. Though even that could be considered dilution of the order. This though is absolute intent to deceive.
I'm now wondering what they will be placing as advertisements in the MSM newspapers they were also ordered to place adverts in.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wasn't apology, wasn't supposed to be
The only thing mentioned is that the publicity order may be varied "in such other way as may be agreed or settled by further argument". Guess what? No other agreement or settlement was undertaken nor approved by any parties (well other than Apple itself it seems) so therefore the publicity order they have published is contemptuous.
I also notice the link entitled "Samsung/Apple UK judgment." (found at 85) has NOT been changed further showing that Apple has acted with contemptuous intent on the publicity order
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Petulant Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple being childish
High time that Apple accepted that there is a word called "competition" and items that do a similar job are bound to have a similar appearance as well. I don't hear Sony suing Toshiba because their televisions also have a screen and come with a remote control and neither do I hear Ford suing Toyota (or any other car manufacturer) because their product also has four wheels, seats and/or anything else that appears on most other cars. The whole Apple/Samsung thing is ludicrous. Most of what Apple sells can be purchased from other manufacturers to do much the same job at considerably less than the highly inflated prices that Apple seems to think they're worth. Beats me how Apple have managed to con. the public for so long that their products are somehow "special". Clever cult marketing - I'll give them that but, at the end of the day, I would hope that folk with any sense would see right through it. This little temper tantrum shows them up for what they really are. Rather like spoilt brats in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Long time ago Apple was a nice company, but now it's even more evil than MS.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Its not really so much that I love android as I hate the closed nature of the alternative mobile devices. Walled gardens suck, and being locked into one is no better than any industry with an abusive monopoly player. 40 bucks for a power cord is absurd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Apple has managed to turn technology into fashion
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/issues/civil-liberties
[ link to this | view in thread ]
like this gadget
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Like Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nice Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I Like Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Like Apple
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
smartfren andromax terbaru
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apple and Samsung
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Asus
Lists of Tablet Price in Malaysia | laptopmalaysian.blogspot.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Samsung
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]