Abuse Of India's Information Technology Act Results In India's First Arrested Twitter User
from the #guinnessbookofhorribleworldrecords dept
India's somewhat schizophrenic relationship with privacy and freedom of speech has been discussed here before. The Indian government, on one hand, seems to want to do the right thing and safeguard its citizens from censorship and surveillance... but only up to a point. Once the going gets rough (i.e., outbreaks of violence, demonstrations), the government begins ramping up its surveillance and cracking down on free speakers.Given this background, it's a bit surprising to hear that India has only just recently chalked up its first Twitter-related arrest. After all, the UK and the US have been doing it for years already. The person on the receiving end of this unfortunate record-setting event made the mistake of criticizing a politician (of course).
On 20 October, he (Ravi Srinivasan) posted a tweet to his 16 followers saying that Karti Chidambaram, a politician belonging to India's ruling Congress party and son of Finance Minister P Chidambaram, had "amassed more wealth than Vadra".This message ("got reports that karthick chidambaram has amassed more wealth than vadra") went out to all of 16 followers and somehow found its way to Karti himself, who responded like anyone else would when mildly insulted: by contacting law enforcement...
He was alluding to Robert Vadra, son-in-law of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, who was at the centre of a political row after allegations over his links with a top Indian property firm.
Karti Chidambaram (@KartiPC) did not take the tweet in good humour and filed a police complaint on 29 October.… which immediately responded with the sort of speed reserved for appeasing angry politicians.
They arrested Mr Srinivasan early next morning, charged him under Section 66A of India's Information Technology [IT] Act, and demanded 15 days of police custody.Srinivasan's single allegation could have been addressed through India's libel laws, but since that route takes time and money, the offended politician instead used the police department to take care of the "problem" by using the "sweeping power" of Section 66A of the IT Act of 2000.
[Section 66A] can send you to jail for three years for sending an email or other electronic message that "causes annoyance or inconvenience".Loosely worded laws, ostensibly designed to "protect" citizens, usually devolve into tools of censorship. For some strange reason, those with the most power are the ones who feel the most "threatened" by open criticism and dissent. It's little wonder that legislators are more than willing to push through open-ended "cyberlaws" that can be bent to fit any situation. The end result is this fact, which is perhaps least surprising of all:
On the face of it, this protects citizens against online harassment.
In reality, the law is more often used by the state as a weapon against dissent. In each such case, police action has been swift and harsh.
In April, the West Bengal government led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee used Section 66A against a teacher who had emailed to friends a cartoon that was mildly critical of her.
And, interestingly, Section 66A has never been used against politicians.To Srinivasan's credit, he refused to back down from his statement. In addition, his arrest and subsequent appearance on television led to him gaining another 2,300 followers, many of whom are wondering if his arrest was tied to his anti-corruption campaigning. Despite the public support of the arrested tweeter, the politician behind his arrest remains unrepentant, tweeting out this amazing statement in his own defense:
"Free speech is subject to reasonable restrictions. I have a right to seek constitutional/legal remedies over defamatory/scurrilous tweets."There's nothing "reasonable" about arresting someone rather than following the "constitutional/legal remedies" set up by India's libel law. This is simple thug tactics being deployed by someone operating without fear of reprisal. Section 66A needs to be cleaned up if freedom of speech and privacy are going to be protected, rather than just paid lip service at convenient intervals.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: arrests, india, politics, social media, speech
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This will all end in violence
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Did I read that right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The law according to Streisand
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But after sometime, when they had least expected, a hero/villain (depending on from whose perspective you are reading it - public/politician) arrives on the scene daring to interfere with their personal (read national) interests. In other words, threating to bind their appetite in a limit "defined by the law".
As a result, as has been mentioned in the Holy Book of the ignorant masses, called the "Constitution", that ultimate power rests in the hands of Politicians (read People), they use their power to suck the poison out of (reform) that "law" as it was unable to serve the personal (national) interests. They fulfill this Holy Ritual by converting that "law" into an open-ended one (just like their appetite), covering all the aspects of their lives (read society).
And in this way, they again become successful in keeping themselves away from the reach of that dreaded weapon that these occasional heroes/villains use, because that's the only "Legal" option they have got, and it is called "LAW"!!!
.
..
(...Wondering what the "Illegal" option is?)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Political misuse of power
The politician needs to step down.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thank you, come again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Defense of Indian IT Act
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Did I read that right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Indian IT Act Section 66A etc based arrests ongoing for some years...
A corporate case of abuse of the IT Act in 2010 is here: http://janamejayan.wordpress.com/2012/11/01/one-more-case-of-misuse-of-section-66-a-of-it-act/ . In this case, a former Judge Mr Chandrasekhar Shankar Dharmadhikari, a self-described Mahatma Gandhian and school operator, claims to have been electronically defamed by his former employee (words objected to are found in the press report). The employee was reportedly arrested under IT Act Section 66A etc. The Singaporean blog where the allegedly defamatory words were published ( http://forabettergiis.blogspot.com/ ) denied having identified the former employee through a Singapore affidavit, as reported by Techdirt in 2010:
http://techdirt.com/articles/20100718/20510110255.shtml
The internet content laws of Singapore/USA/UK vs. India could be substantially different, with India taking a more restrictive view criminializing online speech, a so-called "heavy touch" compared to say Singapore's "light touch". In fact the Indian IT Act may favor "forum shoppers" to rush there for online actions. The slow pace of India's judicial processing is not an issue to some, and is even a boon for for certain others who seek to keep free speech clamped down as long as contentious matters are "sub judice", that is, a very long time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
India =
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: India =
[ link to this | view in thread ]
undebated law... = harassment.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: India =
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]