The Pirate Bay's Perfectly Legal 'The Promo Bay' Blocked By UK ISPs
from the blunt-instrument dept
Last week Techdirt wrote about the perverse attitude of the UK recording industry, which seems obsessed with "stamping out piracy" rather than making more money. Here's a story from TorrentFreak that looks to be another example of attacking first and thinking afterwards:
Several UK Internet providers are blocking Pirate Bay's perfectly legal promotion platform for independent artists. The Promo Bay website is currently being blocked by BT, Virgin Media, BE and possibly several other providers. A plausible explanation is that the Promo Bay domain is listed on the same blocklist that's used to enforce the Pirate Bay blockade. However. the domain itself has never linked to infringing material, nor is it hosted on The Pirate Bay's servers.
As that explains, The Promo Bay, which we wrote about back in January, is not offering any unauthorized copies of music, and is hosted independently from The Pirate Bay. So either it's been blocked because its association with The Pirate Bay is enough to goad the UK recording industry into unthinking action, or else it's happened by mistake.
Either way, the fact that a perfectly legal service offering perfectly legal material has been rendered inaccessible without warning and for no discernible reason is a reminder that site blocking is a really poor way to tackle unauthorized downloads, with the likelihood of collateral damage. Far better to offer good legal alternatives - like The Promo Bay.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, copyright, guilt by association, promo bay, uk
Companies: the pirate bay
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Liars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How is this handled for everyone else?
Let's imagine that you set up a legit business in the front hall of a brothel, a crackhouse or an illegal casino. The cops bust down the door and haul everyone down to the stationhouse. Does anyone care about just how legit your business happens to be? NO! You'll be lucky not to go to jail along with the illegit owners. You lie down with dogs, you get fleas.
But on the Internet, Big Piracy, Big Search and Big Hardware love to support organizations like Pirate Bay and so they support apologists like this who continue to come up with sophistic schemes to try to pretend that someone is somehow being censored or having their civil rights violated. Wrong.
If they really have a legit business, they can call up a legit server rental firm and be back online in an hour. But that's not the game here. It's all about muddying the water and doing anything to avoid ever giving any money to the artists, writers, musicians, actors, directors, film makers or anyone else. Because any dollar that goes to them can't go to Big Search, Big Piracy or Big Hardware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
That's a horrible analogy. This is a case where your business happens to be in the same mall as another establishment that is illegal. Instead of the cops only raiding the illegal establishment, they set up barricades around the entire mall and don't let anyone in - not just on the day of the raid, but indefinitely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
First result...
Flea Market reopens after raid on counterfeit goods.
So...
About that indefinitely there, bob.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
That fact (and quite honestly most facts in general) is largely irrelevant to people like them. When you are a member of a (in their words) "group of apologists" (in this case copyright maximalists) who are " ready to twist everything into some terrible infringement" and live your life viewing everything through a set of preconceived blinders, you simply assume that's how everyone sees the world. No amount of logic, reason, or facts is going to sway their opinions, or change their judgements.
The fact is their arguments are so weak, their assumptions so unsupported by tested data, and the actions of the entertainment industry so anti-creator and anti-consumer that I know dozens, if not hundreds of people like myself who have gone from being very pro-copyright to extremely anti-copyright, but I know of nobody, personally, their arguments have ever swayed to their ideologies. They do more to injure their own cause then anything "pirates" could do to "hurt" them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
I'm guessing they did an investigation and found that it was a bunch of folks who thumb their nose at responsibility and have no care about getting along with others or respect the hard work of others.
If the police got confused, Pirate Bay has only themselves to blame for their elaborate games of denial and finger pointing and loophole searching.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
Let's imagine that you set up a legit business in the front hall of a brothel, a crackhouse or an illegal casino.
Let's imagine you know how the internet works, and you stop making up stupid analogies that don't work.
But on the Internet, Big Piracy, Big Search and Big Hardware love to support organizations like Pirate Bay and so they support apologists like this who continue to come up with sophistic schemes to try to pretend that someone is somehow being censored or having their civil rights violated. Wrong.
No, bobby, *not* wrong. Was there speech? Yes. What it illegal speech? No. Is it being blocked by the government? Yes.
It is censorship. I'd just simply love to read why you think this isn't censorship. Love, love love. Please tell us. It will be doublespeak gold.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
Accessories to crimes go to jail all of the time even though the only thing they did was open their mouth during the planning stages. Only the loons around here think of this as censorship.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
So...creating a hyperlink to a murder target is ..what now?
You need to answer Infamous Joe's #9 comment above: WHY is this not censorship? Please elaborate, and show your work. Otherwise, you have nothing to really say besides some shill speak and invective.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
No more (bad) analogies: How is shutting down PromoBay, which is completely within the law, NOT censorship?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
> business in the front hall of a brothel,
> a crackhouse or an illegal casino.
Analogy fail.
The Promo Bay was not hosted alongside of or in the 'front hall' of the Pirate Bay. It's operated completely independently.
> It's all about muddying the water and doing
> anything to avoid ever giving any money to
> the artists
Except for the fact that in this case, it's the artists themselves that are making their material available on the Promo Bay and are reaping the rewards. The only ones who aren't getting paid are the middleman gatekeepers (Big Content) who are cut out of the process.
Which, of course, is the *real* reason they want to shut it down. Piracy is just the excuse, and a dishonest one at that, considering there is *no* piracy at all on the Promo Bay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
It seems only the non creative freeloaders think that the Pirate Bay has any value at all.
I say let them burn! and may we live in a world where non creative people and thieves of Intellectual property are held accountable for their actions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
What did they do to you?
Did they drop a 2x4 on your head when you were little?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
#bobfail
The Promo Bay is "entirely dedicated to promoting the work of independent musicians, filmmakers and other content creators."
Now admittedly, the dollars aren't going to the Big Legacy Gatekeepers with this setup. Is that what you are really upset about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
First of all, it's impossible to set up a legit business in the same building as an illegal one and call it legit. Secondly, people would care if, in Bizzaro World, you can open a legit shop, because it's circumventing due process, unless the warrant seizes the whole property, which is allowed.
Thing is here: DUE PROCESS is the point. Those who shut down access to a website don't do so because of DUE PROCESS, but rather the belief it's okay to trounce the law for the sake of stupidity.
Pirate Bay isn't a piracy site. Users of TPB are at fault.
By your logic, with the analogy above, every road in America would be shut down because they all lead to the brothel, crackhouse, or illegal casino.
Suits me just fine. No more rush hour traffic. /sarcasm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
article- The Promo Bay is not offering any unauthorized copies of music, and is hosted independently from The Pirate Bay.
Really bob? the article is shorter than your comment and you still didn't bother to read it?
Troll smarter not harder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
You're an idiot, bob. How about you crawl back to whatever shithole you spawned from for a couple more weeks of absence?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
Oh that's right.. Brothels are illegal in the USA.. silly me I thought we were talking about world wide organisations and not specifically USA based enterprises.. or are you suggesting that the USA should tell the rest of the world that brothels need to be legal now?
Should we have a "War on Brothels"?
As for the promo bay.. It's controlled by an Australian who is now getting lots of legal advice for what to do to the UK ISP's if they are intentionally blocking a legitimate and LEGAL Business.
Also I see you, like the rest of your ilk in the *AA's, really hate the idea of due process since you seem to think that a legitimate business should be locked up with the likes of the crack heads etc..
I hope you know EVERYTHING your own associates are involved in, who knows one day you might be charged for having a vapourous association with them too.. We can only hope hey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How is this handled for everyone else?
Exchanging drugs for money? Not a priori criminal either.
Gambling for money? Again, not a priori criminal.
Sharing & building upon mankind's culture without respect to an 18th century privilege? Such cultural liberty is everyone's birthright - essential to us, to mankind.
The privilege that abridges our liberty is the crime.
Prostitution, drugs, and gambling are sometimes proscribed because people have a problem with them.
'Ignoring our monopolies' is being made into a crime because corporations and their anachronistic laws have a problem with people.
People have a problem with corporations and their unethical privileges.
When it comes to people and sociopathic legal artifices, the former abolishes the latter - eventually.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You'd rather they were "obsessed with ... making more money"?
Hmm.
But again, at best it's just an assertion that you believe they're doing it all wrong and that YOUR unproven notions will net them more money.
Rest of it is: pirates just can't get a break even when they try to sanitize their loot. Boo hoo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd rather they were "obsessed with ... making more money"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd rather they were "obsessed with ... making more money"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd rather they were "obsessed with ... making more money"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd rather they were "obsessed with ... making more money"?
But seriously the day they started censoring the internet was a sad day for mankind, free information sharing was one of the best things we had going for us.
In 20 years time when we're locked in our houses after 10pm and given a choice between 5 pay per view government approved programs we will look back on this time and sigh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Don't tell them about it.
Now they'll probably look it up and see it's about music and block it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mistake?
Alternative explanation: The music industry doesn't want independent artists, especially as the Internet continues to render music publishers increasingly irrelevant. The association with the Pirate Bay is just a convenient excuse.
Anyway... this kind of censorship is what happens when you have a system that treats people as guilty until proven innocent and gives them little or no opportunity to prove themselves innocent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mistake?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mistake?
Fuck The MAFIA A-Holes !
Buy and Support Local and Indie Art.
And Fuck the Governments who cave in to MAFIAA Lies and BS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Makes perfect sense
However, if you go off the assumption that the basis of the objections to piracy is not one of profits for the artists, but rather a fight over control of both artists and profits for the middle-men, then blocking a site like that makes perfect sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Promobay's stated mission is to "Break the music industry."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Promobay's stated mission is to "Break the music industry."
From what I understand the site 'The Promo Bay' hasn't been shut down but rather blocked, so I'm assuming that there are ways around it, e.g. via proxy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is an expected progression.
Next they demand that even if you try to play by their "rules" they will squash you because you aren't them.
Basically school yard behavior, if you aren't winning keep changing the rules until you are.
Ofcourse everyone else will quit long before you get to win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it's good enough for countries to build military/terrorist installations next to orphanages/hospitals it should be good enough for the Internet too. =P
*This is not to be taken seriously*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kudos to our 'leaders' for putting the world of politics back into 1400 AD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They at least allowed us to shoot people who annoyed us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Label control
That's what they have a problem with
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd also like to add that I am a British recording artist and no unelected industry watchdog has asked me how I'd like them to behave on my behalf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The internet has stolen the labels' thunder, so all that's left for them is to lean on pappa government to enforce their monopoly. Their sense of entitlement is deplorable. They're attempting to dictate via copyright enforcement who sinks and swims in the industry, rather than allowing the consumers to make that decision.
Clearly they're afraid of the independent culture. Too bad that for them that we're not going anywhere!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The internet has stolen the labels' thunder, so all that's left for them is to lean on pappa government to enforce their monopoly. Their sense of entitlement is deplorable. They're attempting to dictate via copyright enforcement who sinks and swims in the industry, rather than allowing the consumers to make that decision.
Clearly they're afraid of the independent culture. Too bad that for them that we're not going away without a fight!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope that's a typo or at worst shorthand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]