Chinese Nobel Prize-Winner Says We Need Censorship Like We Need Airport Security
from the super-silly-or-super-subtle? dept
This year's winner of the Nobel prize in literature, the Chinese writer Mo Yan, was a controversial choice. Some saw him as too close to the Chinese establishment, and thus insufficiently heroic -- unlike the previous Chinese Nobel prize-winner, the imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo.
While Mo was in Stockholm to pick up his prize, he gave a press conference where, inevitably, he was asked about this:In addressing the sensitive issue of censorship in China, Mo likened it to the thorough security procedures he was subjected to as he traveled to Stockholm.Some will see this as confirming his supine attitude to state censorship. But maybe it's just an extremely subtle attack on airport security...
"When I was taking my flight, going through the customs ... they also wanted to check me even taking off my belt and shoes," he said. "But I think these checks are necessary."
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, china, free speech, mo yan, security
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Na
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Na
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is what's so sad about states that censor or do mass surveillance on their people. After about 2 decades or so of doing it, the new generations are born with it, and the whole society will start believing that they are good things, and never were bad things.
And this is the danger that is running in US right now, too. A whole generation growing with things like TSA, Patriot Act, and warrantless spying, and thinking those things have always existed and it's a necessary thing that the government needs to do to keep them safe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
150 year copyright
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Come on....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Come on....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We need censorship like...
See 1 minute 25..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tongue in cheek?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Censorship is one of the biggest evils of the human race. I'm not talking about censorship for children or when you tell a white lie to not be rude, I mean Government and Religions!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Come on....
Wait, no, that's not right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The important part is clear
After all, few of us are extremists. Most of us believe that some security is necessary at the expense of some convenience, for example. It is scalar, even if the spectrum on techdirt is likely to be at the more liberal side.
However, almost all of us put less emphasis on the undesireable elements of own culture than we put on the undesirable elements of other cultures.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I agree
Yes, I'd love to go back in time to the 70s when you could walk up to the gate, buy a ticket and hop on the plane minutes before departure time. I argue that we're no safer today than we were then.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stupid
[ link to this | view in thread ]