You Only Live Once, So Why Not Demand Payment For The YOLO Acronym You Didn't Invent?

from the you-only-live-long-enough-to-troll dept

Thu, Dec 27th 2012 11:53am — Mike Masnick

The singer Drake has, at times, been good about not being an IP absolutist, blasting his own label (Universal Music) for taking down the music he was leaking. However, it appears that he's not above demanding money for ideas he didn't come up with. According to Mashable, Drake has been tweeting at various retailers, demanding that they send him money for selling clothing that include the word "YOLO," recognized as an acronym for "You Only Live Once." Drake posted to his Instagram feed a picture of YOLO hats at Walgreens and said:

Walgreens....you gotta either chill or cut the cheque

He sent a similar message about YOLO clothes at Macys.

Drake, along with Rick Ross, are credited with popularizing YOLO in the song "The Motto" released in late 2011. The acronym became so popular since then that the Oxford English Dictionary had it as a runner up for word of the year.

So, if Drake came up with YOLO, does he deserve money? Well, there's a problem. A look at the etymology of YOLO suggests it predates Drake's song by many years -- and, in fact, a YOLO clothing line was launched back in 2004 following the use by one of the characters in the NBC TV show Average Joe. Similarly, the term went into the Urban Dictionary way back in 2004 as well. A search of the US PTO trademark database, shows a bunch of trademarks (and applications) related to the word "Yolo," some of which date back before Drake's song. Drake may have popularized it, but he didn't come up with it, and to now claim ownership of it seems pretty rich. Though, I guess, if "you only live once," perhaps his feeling is he might as well make an obnoxious cash grab for something someone else came up with.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: drake, trademark, yolo, you only live once

32 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

John Fenderson (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 11:58am

That's hilarious
I first saw and used "YOLO" about 15 years ago. I first saw it on clothing (a shirt) about 10 years ago.

Never in a million years would I have associated it with Drake in particular.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:00pm
  
  Re: That's hilarious
  I wonder if this isn't just the ignorance of youth? I remember my daughter being shocked that I knew what "wtf", "rofl", and the like meant. She thought these were new, youth-culture terms and simply didn't know that I'd been using them from well before she was born.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - MrWilson, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:19pm
    
    Re: Re: That's hilarious
    I've seen this before as well.
    
    Notably, I think a lot of people who were kids of the Ninja Turtle cartoon era believed that the Turtles were the original source of the surfer lingo they used.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:40pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: That's hilarious
      Cowabunga dude!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:45pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: That's hilarious
      They aren't...? Life = ruined!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 10:27pm
  
  Re: That's hilarious
  So now you're saying that "touring and t-shirts" aren't the solution? wow, ok... too funny... seems like you guys aren't happy unless artists aren't getting paid no matter how "innovative" they are... seems to me, it's a pretty innovative idea to make t-shirts with your own logo and phrase!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 8:16am
    
    Re: Re: That's hilarious
    You're not that sharp on the uptake, are you?
    
    No, what was said, quite clearly, is that the phrase YOLO was on t-shirts AT LEAST 15 years ago. Meaning that the phrase was around long before Drake was and, for John Federson at least, is in no way associated with Drake.
    
    Nothing more was said, nothing less was said.
    
    You of course attempted to spin that to a shot against artists profiting. A failed shot at that.
    
    But again, to clarify, Drake is not innovating. Why not? Because the phrase "you only live once" has been around for quite some time now, and quite some time before Drake was singing it, thereby meaning it is NOT his phrase. He is of course free to make and sell t-shirts with his own logo and phrases, but claiming ownership over the phrase "you only live once" and attempting to extort others for using what is and has been a common phrase for some time is a bit much.
    
    So yes, in this case, Drake is in the wrong. As are you, but when it comes to YOU being wrong... well, that's par for the course.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:08pm

Gots to gets paid
When did selling out get trumped by gettin paid?

Sell-out used to be a bad thing. I guess everyone has their price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mitch Featherston, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:11pm

No End...
Clearly, our world is IP-crazy. Who's to blame? I think we can lay the blame on bad business models that attack free thought and on government-granted monopolies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

out_of_the_blue, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:12pm

OH, NOW you distance yourself!
"The singer Drake has, at times, been good about not being an IP absolutist," -- NOW he's an "anomaly", right? You won't stick by your examples, which is just another example of your cherry picking approach to argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rikuo (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:14pm
  
  Re: OH, NOW you distance yourself!
  Blue...you're the one who constantly goes on about "anomalies", not us here at Techdirt.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:25pm
  
  Re: OH, NOW you distance yourself!
  Huh? That made no sense.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:54pm
  
  Re: OH, NOW you distance yourself!
  You're not even trying to be coherent anymore, are you?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jameshogg (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:23pm
  
  Re: OH, NOW you distance yourself!
  I would defend Apple against anyone who tried to patent troll them. I would also do the same defending Samsung against patent trolls.
  
  I would also defend the MPAA and RIAA against copyright litigation.
  
  Indeed, I would attack Kickstarter if it attempted to obtain the IP of other people's projects for abusive ends. Instagram and Facebook have recently tried this, and ended up getting the backlash they deserve.
  
  You always look at the action itself, not the people involved with that action. That is what we call "matter of principle". Always take the side of the victim.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
trish, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:30pm

Mike, If there's one thing I learned reading Techdirt, it's that artists or anyone associated with art does not actually have to do anything to deserve money, besides ask for it and bitch about how much they deserve it. For, you know, his future grandkids might have to work otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TroutFishingUSA, 28 Dec 2012 @ 10:59am
  
  Re:
  Maybe you should try actually getting to know some artists, rather than taking your cues from an admitted Google shill and a guy who makes no bones about wanting to strip artist's income to as bare as possible because his industry just can't stand to pay people for their labor.
  
  For, you know, his future grandkids might have to work otherwise.
  
  I suppose then that you are opposed to inheritances? You're going to give everything your parents leave you to the public, right? C'mon man, keep it consistent.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 12:36pm

Tweets
These are just tweets. Until I see a lawsuit I am taking it as a joke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:10pm

Who is Drake?

:confused:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:30pm
  
  Re:
  He's a Shadowrun character who can transform into a dragon.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - dennis deems (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 2:01pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Nice!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Franklin G Ryzzo (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:32pm
  
  Re:
  Drake is the first name of Drake Mallard... otherwise known as Darkwing Duck.
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_Mallard#Cast_and_characters
  
  He's a superhero from a nineties Disney cartoon kind of like Batman but funnier and with more Launchpad McQuack.
  
  /amidoinrite?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2012 @ 2:04pm
  
  Re:
  He used to be on "The Amanda Show" before joining forces with Josh.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Reality Check (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 9:14pm
  
  Re:
  Someone should sue him about using that name.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
jameshogg (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 1:15pm

The ridicule always seems to appear from the side of IP proponents rather than their counterparts.

Always a sign of a conservative, status-quo mantra that is grinding against reality and has been going on for too long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eric Goldman (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 2:04pm

YOLO = You Only Lose Once?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 3:32pm
  
  Re:
  If he continues on this path, he's going to lose a lot more than just once...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
loaderboy (profile), 27 Dec 2012 @ 4:40pm

I lay claim to ...
BOGO. I think I'll start trolling department and grocery stores tomorrow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
spaceman spiff, 27 Dec 2012 @ 9:06pm

What a maroon!
Yolo county California my disagree with this bonehead...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
G Thompson (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 1:01am

Like most people who's Ego's are bigger than their intellects he has been using the wrong Acronym for himself.

Instead reading the above info he should be using FIGJAM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rev. James (profile), 1 Jan 2013 @ 7:54am

You only live once
I refuse to use the acronym, and this is the first time I've actually used the phrase since the 1970s - I thought it was stupid then (Hello, Captain Obvious?), and it's even more idiotic now - because it's become a catchphrase for gangbangers and other intellectually challenged people, used to glorify their continued criminality and/or their lack of intelligence. That is the only claim that Drake has to the phrase/acronym - he gave the single-digit-IQ crowd something they can use to show pride in their single-digit IQs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2013 @ 7:58pm

Where do you get the shirts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2013 @ 7:58pm

Where do you get the shirts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]