White House Petition On Legalizing Unlocking Of Mobile Phones Tries To Pass 100,000 Signature Threshold
from the getting-closer... dept
Last month, we wrote about how the White House had bumped up the number of signatures it requires to get on "We the People..." petitions from 25,000 to 100,000 before it is "required" to respond (though, its response rate on qualifying petitions has been dismal). Around the same time, we also talked about how unlocking your mobile phone, so it could be used on other carriers, was switching from being legal to being illegal, thanks to the Librarian of Congress choosing not to renew an exemption to the DMCA's anti-circumvention rules for unlocking mobile phones.While the reasoning for not renewing the exemption was that many carriers now allow unlocking anyway, that's not true across the board, and there are plenty of limitations. Just the fact that you need to ask permission to do what you want with a device you legally purchased and own should be troubling enough. Lots of people were reasonably angered by this story, and a petition sprung up on the White House site, urging the President to reinstate the exemption:
We ask that the White House ask the Librarian of Congress to rescind this decision, and failing that, champion a bill that makes unlocking permanently legal.The petition itself was actually set up by Sina Khanifar, who used to run a business around unlocking phones, and was threatened by Motorola back in 2005. It was that experience that led to the original attempt to convince the Librarian of Congress to establish the unlocking exemption from the DMCA. He has explained why the exemption is important, and how this simple change not only makes something perfectly reasonable against the law, but how it effectively kills off the business he had built around unlocking phones and helping consumers actually use what they want. And, contrary to what some claim about the need to keep phones locked, he points out that there are already contractual ways to incentivize people to keep their phones locked. Lots of carriers have long term contracts with large early termination fees. They don't need the threat of copyright penalties on top of that as well.
Motorola's cease and desist letter didn't claim that I was illegally distributing their copyrighted software. Instead, it claimed that I was "distributing software ... for the purpose of circumventing the protection measures" associated with their copyrighted software. There is a subtle but meaningful difference.As we've noted time and time again, the DMCA anti-circumvention clause has little to do with basic copyright, and everything to do with big companies trying to control what you thought you had purchased.
The DMCA includes anti-circumvention provisions that are intended to protect music and movie owners who want to distribute their work digitally, but are afraid of piracy. The provisions prohibit anyone from circumventing the locks that control access to copyrighted works. For example, DVDs are protected by a Digital Rights Management (DRM) system that attempts to prevent anyone from easily making copies of movies. The DMCA prohibits circumventing that type of protection system.
But unlocking a phone has nothing to do with copyright infringement, and using the DMCA to prosecute unlocking cell phones is not what the law was intended for. If Motorola's interpretation of the DMCA were valid, companies would be able to create simple software security mechanisms that legally prevent a customer from using a device in any way except that in which the manufacturer intended.
The petition needs to get to 100,000 signatures by February 23rd, and is currently sitting at about 62,000. It's possible, but it may be difficult. And, of course, it's not even clear what (if anything) the administration can really do. The DMCA exemption rulemaking only comes around every three years. Having them jump in with an "off-year" change would be unprecedented -- and could potentially lead to legal challenges. Congress, however, could step in and fix things with a bit of regulation, but it's unclear if they have the appetite to do that. Still, having people speak out and show that they think this bit of copyright law is crazy and restrictive seems like a good thing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-circumvention, dmca, exceptions, mobile phones, petition, sina khanifar, unlocking, white house
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legal
There is a tradition of doing this in all sorts of areas (including warmaking powers), and it generally passes constitutional muster. Whether it should or not is a different question (I don't think it should).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Legal
I don't like it, either. Instead of being able to merely check federal, state, and local statutes (which are monstrously large themselves), a person also has to check the rules made by every agency, in order to simply comply with the law. The average person is supposed to check with the Librarian of Congress to see whether he deigned to allow them to unlock their own phone this year?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rational Decision
1. That argument could be expanded to making it illegal to DRM software, videos, and games, which has less of a chance of passing than fat cat through the eye of a needle.
2. We don't have time for rational solutions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rational Decision
I don't know about that. Illegalizing DRM is something that we definitely do need to have happen if we're ever going to get our stolen rights back, and if enough people get up in arms about it, it will happen.
Remember the SOPA protests, and the lesson we (re-)learned from that delightful bit of true democracy: votes trump money every time.
If we can get the message out, and explain to enough people that DRM is nothing but a hacking tool used by copyright owners to take away your control over your property and stomp on your rights, people will start pushing back. But if the people who understand the situation believe that it will never happen... that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
are you kiddin' me? Congress do something sensible? do something it's supposed to do? do something to help the voters, rather than the businesses that are lining pockets of said members of Congress? you got no chance!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(Rhetorical question.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
America
America has lost their freedom to do almost anything that big business does not want them to do, the only way to get anything done is to protest, but even then they make you a laughing stock of the world , ala the occupy movement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: America
If anyone made Occupy a laughing stock it was the US mainstream media and BBC, but i digress. Mainland europe and several other countries were discussing the problems with financial extravaganza (Government, Stock exchanges and Banks), education (the student debts) and poverty since they are also pertinent internationally.
Today the thing is that education and poverty are budgets getting slashed quite heavily here. The banks have taken some economic beating but the problematic parts of their business is 100% unchanged, while the stock exchange has made a few small adjustments and called it a day. So much for nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please Help!
There's still time! 11 days left to get 100,000 minimum signatures.. At present, there is 65,000 sigs.. Please pass this petition link around to help make a difference! And, btw you don't have to reside in the USA to sign, and if u need to create an account u don't have to put any identifying info in it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Please Help!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Please Help!
Did you not notice that this petition is exactly what this article is about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Please Help!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The choice is yours
(usually for less than the contract price)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
Both phones will have the exact same monthly charges. It isn't like I am going to turn off my phone service if I buy an unlocked phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
They do charge for the phone in gentle monthly fees, that are disguised as minimum usage fee per month, which includes the value necessary to cover the phone full retail price and in some cases double that, the termination fees are also calculated with base on that full retail price, that is why they go down the longer you use that plan.
Quote:
Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/12/t_mobile_end_smartphone_subsidies_paying_mor e_for_your_phone_is_good_for.html
http://www.prepaid-wireless-guide.com/subsidies.html
http:// www.mobiletechreview.com/editorials/Cell-Phone-Deals-Beware.htm
http://gigaom.com/2012/12/06/t-mobi le-ceo-confirms-the-iphone-and-the-death-of-phone-subsidies/
A $99 phone actually is the carrier mining the fools pockets.
You could have a $0 smartphone all you have to do is divide the full retail price by 24 months and save that much every month it will cost you less than if you let other do it and administer it for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
Side note concerning T-Mobile's network coverage: I was considering switching to T-Mobile from Sprint for my next device (since I can't get a Nexus 4 that works on Sprint). However, a friend with T-mobile service visited my apartment last week and we discovered that T-Mobile not only doesn't have 4G service at my apartment, they don't even have 3G coverage here >_
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
Using your carrier for network is not a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
Aren't you glad that oligopolies and exclusive contracts are so strong in the US communication sector?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Response to: Mr. Applegate on Feb 11th, 2013 @ 7:08pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have an unlocked phone and it is way cheaper for me to chose a no contract plan with tmobile than to go with the offerings of att or verizon.I have choices now that I didn't have before and sometimes that is worth way more than the price of the phone...still signed the petition though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, there's always firing the Librarian
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, there's always firing the Librarian
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Signed up too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.smartsign.com/no-cell-phone-signs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I was only going to unlock a cellphone to use certain features. Like the last 2 Samsung Windows phones before Windows Phone 8, required you to unlock it to debrand (void your warranty) to download an update. This was the wireless provider AT&T and Samsung's fault for not providing the update. Unlocking is basically the same thing as voiding the warranty, so I don't understand why the Librarian of Congress feels the need to protect the providers. The LOC sucks anyway when giving access to the public. "You must be a researcher to enter this building." Well, thanks. This what I get in the city of the free and home of the brave, Washington DC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mobil secret lock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]