Another Victory For The Public Speaking Up: Canada Drops Digital Spying Bill (For Now)
from the a-good-step dept
A year ago, we had a series of posts concerning attempts in Canada to pass a "lawful access" bill, which is a nice way of saying "a bill to let Canadian law enforcement spy on your digital information." Politicians who supported this, like Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, kicked things off in the most ridiculous of ways, saying that anyone who was against such a bill supported child pornographers. In response, tons of Canadians spoke up, even creating a whole meme in which they revealed random info to Toews. And, of course, when people shared some of Toews' own info, he went ballistic.Earlier this week, it was announced that the Canadian government has agreed not to move forward with the bill, claiming that they "listened" to the concerns of the public:
We will not be proceeding with Bill C-30 and any attempts that we will continue to have to modernize the Criminal Code will not contain the measures contained in C-30, including the warrantless mandatory disclosure of basic subscriber information or the requirement for telecommunications service providers to build intercept capability within their systems. We've listened to the concerns of Canadians who have been very clear on this and responding to that.This is, undoubtedly, another big win for consumers speaking out when their government tries to put in place something ridiculous. As always, Michael Geist has an excellent analysis of what this all means, including that we should add this to the still small, but rapidly growing list of internet advocacy success stories. But, of course, as with any of these success stories, the story is not actually over. He notes that there are still problems and challenges concerning privacy of info:
Third, even with Bill C-30 dead, there is a problem with the current system of voluntary disclosure of customer information by ISPs. The lawful access debate placed the spotlight on the fact that ISPs disclose customer information tens of thousands of times every year without court oversight. The law permits these disclosures, but there are no reporting requirements or accountability mechanisms built into the process. Those are needed and the government should move swiftly to add this to the law, either within Bill C-12 (the PIPEDA reform bill) or Bill C-55, which was introduced yesterday.This is a key point that many people keep trying to drive home. There have been a few very important internet advocacy success stories recently, but these fights don't end when a single bill is killed. Supporters of bad policies are playing the long game -- pushing for these changes in a variety of different places in a variety of different ways over a long period of time. Killing one part is absolutely a victory, but it still requires significant and continued vigilance.
Fourth, Bill C-30 may be dead, but lawful access surely is not. On the same day the government put the bill out its misery, it introduced Bill C-55 on warrantless wiretapping. Although the bill is ostensibly a response to last year's R v. Tse decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, much of the bill is lifted directly from Bill C-30. Moreover, there will be other ways to revive the more troublesome Internet surveillance provisions. Christopher Parsons points to lawful intercept requirements in the forthcoming spectrum auction, while many others have discussed Bill C-12, which includes provisions that encourage personal information disclosure without court oversight. Of course, cynics might also point to the 2007 pledge from then-Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day to not introduce mandatory disclosure of personal information without a warrant. That position was dropped soon after Peter Van Loan took over the portfolio.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, digital spying, lawful access, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Killing one part is absolutely a victory, but it still requires significant and continued vigilance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rapidly growing list? To quote the Princess Bride - I do not think it means what you think it means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
UK, AU & soon CA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
same old story. when politicians want to spy on others, it's fine. totally different story when those same politicians have their privacy splashed all over the internet, the papers and the tv, eh?
trouble is, as stated, the bill will be brought back under a new name, with the same shit in it but perhaps more disguised, just as ACTA is rearing it's ugly head again. just like Karel de Gucht is no 'negotiating' in the USA to bring in stricter copyright controls which, from what i read, will be regarded as 'the gold standard' of copyright enforcement. it always seems that when something doesn't go the way these arse holes want, they are able to reintroduce them. when something is introduced that is of benefit to everyone other than big business, but kicked out, it is never allowed to be started again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That wasn't obvious to me, and pronunciation is often (always?) missed in writing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-Unless we change a word here and there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-Unless we change a word here and there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm protesting
For future techdirt articles I will request that you print them off and snail mail them to me and I'll then write my comments and send them back to you for you to post on my behalf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Big Deal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Feb 14th, 2013 @ 2:26pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]