Iceland: Going From Protecting Free Speech Online... To Setting Up Their Own Great Firewall?
from the quite-a-shift dept
Over the past few years, we've seen various stories about Iceland really trying to position itself as a free-speech-supporting, internet-loving hub. There has been support from various government officials about more strongly keeping the internet open and allowing for innovation to bloom, hoping to encourage other countries to follow suit. However, it appears that not all politicians agree. Ogmundur Jonasson, Iceland's interior minister, is apparently putting together legislation that would build a great censorship firewall in Iceland similar to China's. Of course, as is typical with attempts to censor the internet, they're saying it's all about blocking porn."At the moment, we are looking at the best technical ways to achieve this," an advisor to Jonasson told the Mail. "But surely if we can send a man to the moon, we must be able to tackle porn on the internet."Last I checked, Iceland did not send a man to the moon. But, even ignoring that, this whole idea is silly. Any attempt to ban porn (or really access to porn) will fail in two important ways. First, it will not actually block access to porn. People can and will always find a way around the filters and will continue to access porn. Second, it will, undoubtedly, lead to non-porn information being falsely classified as being porn and blocked. Both of these are problematic.
But, more problematic is even opening the door to a government mandated censorship regime. Even if you believe that pornography is horrible and damaging and needs to be stopped, this is not the way to do this. You are only guaranteeing further censorship. It is inevitable. Providing tools for censorship always results in eventual mission creep, as someone who doesn't like some other kind of information points out that "if you can do it for porn, why not for..." It's a very dangerous slippery slope.
Furthermore, plans like this completely undermine all of the efforts that people in Iceland have put into promoting a free and open internet. Those claims of building an Iceland built around principles of a free and open internet look somewhat laughable when the government's interior minister is looking to craft a blatant internet censorship bill.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, chilling effects, firewall, freedom of speech, iceland, porn
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Shall we crowdsource some hookers to make him a happier and more tolerant person?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, you poor Icelandic bastards. Even the usually uptight US allows porn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you had been you would know that porn is a head chop offense, that all head chop offenses do not result in removal, and that removals occur after after all appeals are exhausted Friday morning after salah.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
call me Apollo
Spoken like a man who has never built anything in his life. If one group of people performed an amazing technical feat, surely we can prevent all of our citizens from performing a very simple one.
And I have to wonder what Jonasson is actually imagining when he talks about "tackling" porn. A small (albeit attractive) opponent who can be easily wrestled to the ground and made to submit to him? Or a large and powerful foe with big muscles and oiled skin... On second thought, I really don't want to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: call me Apollo
"Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself."
A. H. Weiler
(1909 - 2002)
Everyone who works in technology should have a sign like that posted in every conference room where you meet with non-tech people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: call me Apollo
Everyone who gives assignments to people who work in technology should have a sign like that posted in every conference room where you meet with non-tech people.
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: call me Apollo
"Surely if we can send a man to the moon, we must be able to tackle hate in the world."
The day porn is gone is the day we no longer need politicians because the world is a peaceful place with no war or hunger.
Not equating porn to war and hunger, just equating it to something that will never go away so long as humans exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: call me Apollo
It's a war on young men is what it is. Oddly women like porn too, they just call it something else, put up a pink ribbon and spray Chanel on it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: call me Apollo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever seen a politician say, which has to be a new record. For many reasons, but I'll focus on the two most obvious:
First, define "porn". You can't. It's a totally subjective term. Sure, hardcore penetrative sex might be unquestionably porn, but what about mere nudity? If so, how much nudity? Does the definition of such change depending on whether the subject is young or old, male or female? Going to the moon is easy by comparison - it's a clearly defined goal, the only hard part is working out how. With blocking porn, you can't even tie down an objective since every Icelandic citizen will have a different idea of what "porn" is.
Secondly, the issue is not blocking porn, it's how to do it accurately without destroying perfectly legitimate material. Every attempt to implement any such block *always* stops non-pornographic material and *always* leaves some porn unblocked. On top of that, even if you somehow managed to accurately block every time, that one horny teenager is going to find a way to route around said blocks and then it's completely ineffective. Yes, that includes offline methods, which you're not going to be able to block - I shudder to think of some of the unintended consequences.
Oh, and from the original (urgh) Daily Mail article that the Mashable link is referring to:
"This move is not anti-sex. It is anti-violence because young children are seeing porn and acting it out"
Sounds like you have a *parenting* problem... Just another "for the children!" excuse for implementing censorship on adults.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
great way to create your bullshit and never talk how to fix it, oh thats right, you don't want anything fixed, then you would have nothing to cry about
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can't. No one can. Accept it, or kill yourself. Those are your only two options now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't think it'd be a good idea, but there you go.
Now then, since you can no longer call us hypocrites, please focus on the hypocrisy on your own side. Jonasson is the one who "doesn't want anything fixed" here.
Let me specifically call your attention to the fact that he is not attempting to stop porn production, which you would think would be a priority for someone trying to fight pornography. His only goal here is to create the filtering system. Painting it as "stopping porn" is just his way of making the idea more palatable. It will not, and is not intended to, stop porn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
great way to create your bullshit and never talk how to fix it, oh thats right, you don't want anything fixed, then you would have nothing to cry about
Exactly. Apparently all Mike can do is point out how everyone else is stupid and wrong while saying how scary everything is. He can't just sit down and have a productive conversation on the merits like a normal person. What a waste. And a joke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Mike: "That's the stupidest idea in the long, storied history of stupid ideas."
AJ: "WHY CAN'T YOU JUST SOLVE THE PROBLEM INSTEAD OF POINTING OUT HOW FOOLISH IT IS?!?"
Get the point yet? There are some problems in the world that will never be solved. By Mike or anyone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
...and here we have another anonymous tosser incapable of reading. Somehow, every positive article passes by you people so you can erect your strawmen. If you hate him so much, why do you keep reading? Are you a masochist, a moron or just a liar? Oh well, at least you managed to get the author of the article right in your whining, unlike some of your anonymous brethren - or you just got lucky and whined about Mike on an article he actually wrote. Whatever...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, you most certainly are.
...now defending porn,...
The article doesn't do that at all, but even if it did, why is that a problem?
...and claiming they will stiffle everything,...
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/02523121943/russia-uses-new-internet-ce nsorship-bill-to-silence-prominent-reporters-who-criticized-government.shtml
...then how oh mighty guru of the know it all, how do you stop it, you never mention that...
Explain why you want it "stopped". If you wish to protect your kids - be a better parent. You know, stuff like talking to them about healthy sexual relationships and responsible uses of the internet. It's not any government's job to be a nanny for your kids.
great way to create your bullshit and never talk how to fix it, oh thats right, you don't want anything fixed, then you would have nothing to cry about
Once again, what is it that you want fixed?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Porn Blocking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a) the USA earns too much money from the porn industry. even with the 'Hollywood' type of accounting, there must be millions paid in taxes.
b) because really, no one gives a toss about porn (no pun intended) as it is simply an excuse to go down the road of censoring the what, the who, the where, the why and the how. it opens the door even wider for governments to introduce all sorts of 'we dont want that for general release' and for others to start 'we dont like this, it has to be permanently removed! once started, there is no stopping it and the net, regardless of what people think or say, will become worthless, only, however, to the ordinary people. the stopping of the free flow of information, everywhere, is exactly what governments want to stop and this type of stupid thinking is just the beginning!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not try for something easier, like cold fusion, or a cure for cancer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think that is his answer. He doesn't have to deal with internet porn if he goes and lives on the moon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That being said, I suppose I can strike Iceland off the list of countries to move to should the US get too out of hand. My list is shrinking way too rapidly for my comfort :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"so if blocking porn will not stop it, then how oh mighty guru of the know it all, how do you stop it, you never mention that"
Who in their right mind would want to stop porn??? It was possibly one of the greatest incentives for man to build better faster technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland is full of loonies
When democracy is no longer fought for and the population no longer remembers the needs to tackle survival issues (feeding, clothing, protection or sheltering the population)they start turning inwards to self policing on moral and ethical grounds. Simple Anthropology laws.
When this happens, you have multitudes of good intentions pushing for cultural and legal changes that micromanage the population. Micromanagement policies, no matter how well intended, will eventually destroy the freedoms and liberty of a population.
So no matter how good you have it, you should always fight for democracy and never forget it.
We have a remembrance day every year to remember those that have fought in wars for our freedom. We should have a day to remember what we are remembering on that day. A day of freedom!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry :)
Had to be said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FYI...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FYI...
"No mention of whether consensual BDSM is considered violent, though."
It probably would, but that certainly brings up a lot of questions of how these things are filtered and detected, let alone defined. There's certainly no algorithm that can tell you whether or not something's consensual...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland...Firewall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When are next Icelandic elections?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"We" can't send a man to the moon. Neither can the US, the Russians, the Chinese, or anyone else.
Maybe "we" could send a man to the moon half a century ago, but we didn't problems with porn then either. Right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]