Obama Administration Decides Not To Fight Against Fair Use For Public Universities

from the good-news dept

Tue, Feb 26th 2013 1:29pm — Mike Masnick

A couple weeks ago, we wrote about some growing concern that, due to the US Copyright Office's pressure, the Justice Department was seriously considering filing a brief in an important case about fair use. The fear was that the Copyright Office's simplistic argument would carry over to the DOJ, and that could have a massive negative impact on the basic concept of fair use.

Thankfully, the story got a fair bit of attention, and we heard that a lot of people spoke out and more feedback than expected showed up on the DOJ's doorstep, including from some folks in Congress, who were concerned about the possibility of hurting fair use in the educational setting. The end result? The DOJ has chosen not to weigh in after all. While it may seem like not such a big deal to get a government agency to not do something, from a variety of sources, it appears that the Copyright Office and the DOJ were very, very serious about filing something. It's not yet clear if the public speaking out led to the change of heart, but either way, it's good to see the administration back down. Having the federal government argue against fair use and in favor of (mostly foreign) big publishers was just never a good idea, and thankfully they realized that in time.

Doj on Fair Use (PDF)Doj on Fair Use (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, copyright office, doj, e-reserves, fair use, georgia state, libraries, universities

10 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Kevin H (profile), 26 Feb 2013 @ 1:39pm

I fear that while this is said to us upfront that there is some other deal being done behind the scenes that makes this all but pointless. I really have no faith in this administration when it comes to patent/copyright/technology legislation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2013 @ 1:48pm
  
  Re:
  Not trusting government is our patriotic duty. However I would point out the the Exec branch has entrenched elements and influences that go way beyond presidential terms. Its not just this administration, they're just the current tools for the same old beast.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2013 @ 1:46pm

is this really the case or are they going to carry on with what they were going to do, just do it underhandedly? that wouldn't surprise me. all it is gonna mean is we wont know what they are doing until after it's done!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Androgynous Cowherd, 26 Feb 2013 @ 2:06pm

Swartz
Most likely, they decided to keep their heads down because of the amount of flak they're taking over the Swartz affair. For them to openly attack affordable access to educational and research materials at universities right now would have been like pissing on Swartz's grave right in front of the cameras. They'd never have heard the end of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2013 @ 2:32pm
  
  Re: Swartz
  nor should they! arseholes!!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2013 @ 3:01pm

This is good, forcing them to do it under the table, just put it where it rightly belongs on the wrong side of the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2013 @ 3:09pm

They could have filed for the good guys
Hurray, they're neutral! It would have been better if they wrote an amicus in behalf of the universities. But I digress. Reality is what it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
special-interesting (profile), 26 Feb 2013 @ 10:50pm

Comment #7 (thanks for the observation) fulfills my sarcastic side because neutral is only assumption of good. But aside from that... kudos for whatever reason.

In trying to encourage this decision of neutrality, in favor of fair use, I will advance that this is the second in rapid procession of good edicts emanating from the WH. (The first was the Executive Order for publicly funded research to enter public domain.)

Furthermore it is the second time I have recognized some sort of free will in the present administration.. (not a compliment but its a good thing when in the right direction) Points given for not toeing the corporate line and not rubber stamping bureaucracy.

Cautious Kudos for Obama.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jesse (profile), 27 Feb 2013 @ 2:18am

Yay! The government has opted to do nothing instead of making things worse! "Win" for the people!

What a sad state of affairs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 27 Feb 2013 @ 2:42am
  
  Re:
  That. I wonder if public outrage had anything to do with this decision?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]