Two $5,000 RECAP Grants Given Out In Memory Of Aaron Swartz For Improvements In RECAP
from the finally! dept
Back in January, we had mentioned that Aaron Greenspan had offered up three $5,000 grants in memory of Aaron Swartz, for certain key improvements to RECAP, the browser extension that automatically uploads PACER documents to the Internet Archive, making them publicly available. The Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton -- where RECAP was initially developed -- and Greenspan have now announced that two grants have been awarded: one for creating a Chrome browser RECAP plugin and another for extending the capability to work with the appellate courts as well. While it's cool that these grants have been given out, it's even cooler that RECAP is now available for Chrome. If you're a PACER user and a Chrome user, go get the plugin now...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chrome, grants, legal documents, pacer, recap
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I presume that the judge thinks that West reproducing the files from PACER is protected by either implied license or fair use, since those were the only defenses raised and briefed. That opinion will likely give much needed legitimacy to RECAP by extension, I should think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Here's my proposal:
1) The creator gets all the rights, and they're non-transferable;
2) Copyrights and patents to last a maximum of 3+5 years, except in the case of the creator's death, in which case, the copyright ends after two years from the date of the creator's death.
3) Severe punishments for copyfraud (which will be somewhat easier to spot, seeing as, if it's not the creator of the work...);
4) Slower patent applications, and a 6-month-to-prototype rule - if there's no prototype after six months, the patent is automatically invalid - moreover, you cannot sue a person/company during this period.
...That should solve a few problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]