Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the catalyst dept
It's another week with one big winner, this time coming in on our popular post about the DJ who was suspended for pulling the classic "dihydrogen monoxide" prank on his listeners. Gareth soared past the competition in both the insightful and funny categories, because our readers don't seem to think highly of Floridians:
Hardly surprising, given:
A) It's Florida, and
B) It's a Country station.
Not exactly a Venn diagram that would contain a lot of smart listeners.
Meanwhile, our next comment comes in response to something that should be an April Fool's prank but isn't: Warner Bros' attempt at an online streaming service. SirToreth took second place for insightful with his interpretation of the offering:
It isn't about succeeding...
...it's about making it look like you made a "good faith effort", when you're engineering it to fail, then writing off the loss on your taxes, insisting piracy (instead of lack of a compelling product) is the problem, and then insisting on more legislation to put the actually successful streaming services under, and propping up your old business model.
For editor's choice, we start out on one of this week's many posts about Prenda, where an anonymous commenter underlined one of the many imbalances in the system:
So change your MAC address is spoofing a network and worth 35-50 years, but lying to the judges/court system gets you a slap on the hands?
That's justice for ya!
Next, we head to our post about the USPTO's final rejection of Apple's rubberbanding patent. One commenter insisted that it's unrealistic to expect patent examiners to properly review prior art since there's far too much out there for that to be possible. That commenter is correct, but nasch is the one who saw the actual moral of that story:
Isn't that a problem with the patent system, then?
On the funny side, we've already had the number one comment, and our second place winner comes from the same post. Chosen Reject took the prize for warning us about an even bigger threat than dihydrogen monoxide:
Wait till people learn about the amount of dioxygen in the air. It's been responsible for mass extinctions, and is highly linked to forest, home, and business fires. It has also been known to cause rust, accounting for billions of dollars of economic loss every year.
I recommend that everyone who was concerned about dihydrogen monoxide should immediately put in place measures that prevent exposure to dioxygen.
And as long as we're riffing on chemistry, first editor's choice goes to Some Guy for his take on the scare:
It's no joke. Dihydrogen Monoxide kills. If we don't address the problem now, we'll soon be swimming in the stuff.
And finally, our second editor's choice for funny comes from our post about NJ Assemblyman Sean Kean's legislative war on videogames. Kean rationalized his recent anti-video-game bills thusly:
“Just as it’s unlawful for minors to purchase alcohol and cigarettes, because it’s detrimental to their well being, the same can be said of adult video games, most of which contain extremely inappropriate content for a young viewer’s eyes and ears,” said Kean. “These two pieces of legislation are intended to protect children.”
DannyB artfully demonstrated the stupidity of trying to eliminate "inappropriate content":
I would like to point out that High School also contains extremely inappropriate content for a young viewer’s eyes and ears. So if you want to protect the children, then keep them out of high school and safe at home playing video games. This third item is at least as good for the children and for society as the first two pieces of legislation.
Thank you legislators for considering this legislation on this fine early day in April.
And thank you readers for another week of great comments.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yes, it's also contributed towards violently destroying buildings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The top comment is shit
A) It's Florida, and
B) It's a Country station.
Not exactly a Venn diagram that would contain a lot of smart listeners."
It's juvenile & insulting. Bad enough that it got voted funniest comment of the week. It's downright pathetic that it got voted most insightful, given the high level of insight Techdirt commenters come up with week after week. As someone who has been following Techdirt for the better part of a decade, it's clear to me that while the audience has grown considerably, the level of reason among the average contributor (commenter) has fallen notably. The best stuff is still there.
If you think I'm just being curmudgeonly, how well would the comment have been received if there were a couple small changes?
"Hardly surprising, given:
A) It's Baltimore, and
B) It's a Rap station.
Not exactly a Venn diagram that would contain a lot of smart listeners."
Either way it's juvenile, factually incorrect, intolerant and elitist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To Paraphrase:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: To Paraphrase:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
How can people even call it a joke, if it's not mature, precisely accurate and supportive?
Those are the internationally agreed criteria for jokes, I understand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The top comment is shit
However, as a Canadian, I'll point out that seemingly about 90% of Americans are perfectly happy to jump on the bandwagon of cliched Canada jokes no matter how "juvenile, factually incorrect, intolerant and elitist" -- and I suspect the French feel similarly...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The top comment is shit
I'll surrender that point. Sorry about that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ban children. That is the only way to successfully ensure 100% of the children are 100% protected 100% of the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Perfaction, mate!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Perfaction, mate!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Perfaction, mate!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Perfaction, mate!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Croc Jokes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Croc Jokes
http://www.jokes4us.com/animaljokes/alligatorjokes.html
http://www.jokebuddha.com/web/8GX /Alligator
http://goflorida.about.com/od/allaboutflorida/a/stories.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/531327232/h6EA95111/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti-Country Bigotry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]