Police In Japan Are Asking ISPs To Start Blocking Tor
from the really-now? dept
The National Police Agency in Japan is apparently asking ISPs in that country to "voluntarily" block the use of Tor, the well-known and widely used system for anonymously surfing the internet.An expert panel to the NPA, which was looking into measures to combat crimes abusing the Tor system, compiled a report on April 18 stating that blocking online communications at the discretion of site administrators will be effective in preventing such crimes. Based on the recommendation, the NPA will urge the Internet provider industry and other entities to make voluntary efforts to that effect.This is an extreme and dangerous overreaction. Yes, some people abuse the anonymity of Tor to do illegal things. Just as some people abuse the anonymity of cash to do bad things. But we don't then outlaw cash because of this. There are many, many reasons why people have good reason to seek out an anonymizing tool like Tor to protect their identity. What if they're whistle blowing on organized crime or corruption (say) in the police force? As for the fear that it's being used for criminal activity, that doesn't mean that police cannot identify them through other means. We've seen time and time again people leave digital tracks in other ways when they're committing crimes. Yes, it makes life more difficult for police, and it means they have to do actual detective work, but that's what their job is.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I wonder why people freak out that much when it comes to internet related topics when it's perfectly possible to remain anonymous and commit crimes outside it as well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PS For the love of god don't take me serious. "Yeah I'm talking to you government."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How?
That works to nuke Tor in China.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How?
https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy.html.en
Also TOR is in need of bridges people.
Take advantage of Amazon's one year free EC cloud to deploy those.
https://cloud.torproject.org/
You test the storage and help others, this is a win-win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Food for thought
I would just like to point out that the founding fathers of America published plenty of works anonymously before the revolution. It helped rally people to their cause.
As the post states, some people abuse it, but I will always defend the tools of anonymity even if some people do abuse them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Food for thought
Governments are all afraid of the Internet.It is obvious they would be.
Bet they thought like this when Books were first printed or Radio.............sending those signals right into your home...Oh My !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Food for thought
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
For example, there's a Japanese game modding forum which frowns, if not ban outright, foreigners. Why? Cos the "foreigners" by large won't respect the original mod author's wishes for not distributing/re-uploading their work, even if there's "transformative works" involved. As for the native, if the author say "jump", all will ask "how high".
Whether that example can be applied to this matter remain to be seen. But that example is inline with what I know about Japan's history.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Japan
What IS happening is that the publishers are exerting their force disproportionately. What isn't being discussed is the rumbles of new culture that come out of this publisher battle. IE, smaller distributors are going to be rising up to oppose these things and individuals are not going to like this publisher battle.
I'm still not positive that people will enjoy not having access to 2Ch without a shitton of protest though. Something like that is going to force people to really get PO'd about a government that is only focused on the entertainment industry, similarly to how the nuclear reactor explosion forced people to ban nuclear power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
I attribute increased policing action to bad actors: little criminals who wish to commit small scale crimes, and MEGA-actors who spy full time and will soon take over everything, literally become Big Brother. I'm trapped in the shrinking area between various types of criminals.
Moves to do away with TOR is the inevitable result of small and large scale criminals, for differing reasons. The former don't wish it, but do cause it, and corporations have an openly stated goal to strip away privacy for allegedly commercial spying: that's mainly Google and Facebook. (Yeah, I know: HUH? Just consider it as hidden cause when you see TOR outlawed in your own country.)
"This is an extreme and dangerous overreaction." -- WELL, Mike, that's not surprising, just typical of gov't. It's also the way Big Business operates, increasingly so in the de-regulated era that you favor. This is more of the trend to outright fascism in a surveillance society.
But just on the individual use: "good" reasons for using TOR are almost certainly a small fraction of "bad" reasons; it'd be an exception to every other area if not, and SO as ever, "pirates" and criminals DO in practice wreck it for everyone who's not. -- And to be clear again, that's separate from the (yet unseen but must be rising) pressure from Google and Facebook to bring ISPs into their spy systems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
Did it make any sense? Good, that's what I thought when I read your comment.
By the way, if I catch your impersonators will I get that reward?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
Unless you have a link to where he did this, I'll just assume you're hallucinating again. Unless you back up your rants for once, everything I recall Mike saying about net neutrality is in favour of them being common carriers.
Like every point you seem to think you're making in that idiot rant, it's the opposite of reality, the easy strawman you wish you were fighting instead of the harsh reality in front of you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What? TOR isn't a shield against ISP man-in-the-middle?
First, please stop using the term "man-in-the-middle". You don't understand what it means. If your encryption key handling is being done properly, you won't have MITM problems -- even if your ISP is actively trying subvert your communications.
Common carrier status doesn't enter into it. Security that relies on the law for effectiveness is very, very weak security.
This assertion requires some kind of evidence (or at least an explanation for why you think this would be true). I know a lot of people who use Tor. None of them use it for illegal purposes. Although whether it's most used for legal purposes or not shouldn't be relevant.
it'd be an exception to every other area if not
Again, evidence is required. But let's say you're correct: then what you're saying is that everything should be illegal?
No. Overzealous and disproportionate reactions from authorities are what wrecks it for everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only sure way to stop crimes/abuse/cyber-blah is NOT having internet in the 1st place. Are anybody willing to make the commitment to obliterate the internet entirely "just for the children"?
I'd say enough is enough. Choose: either have unfettered internet or destroy it entirely. We can't have it both ways, and anyone saying there's a middle ground in this is delusional at best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Freedom
I'd say enough is enough. Choose: either have unfettered freedom or destroy it entirely. We can't have it both ways, and anyone saying there's a middle ground in this is delusional at best.
^^^ Fixed it for you. ^^^
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, we don't outlaw cash but we do require all transactions over $10,000 (suspicious activity) to be reported to the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Given the whole idea of a program like Tor is to anonymize what is sent and received, there really is no way to spot 'suspicious activity' with regards to someone using a program like that without making it completely useless for it's intended purpose, that of anonymous communication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue - Tor is not a P2p program
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How will anyone bring down dictators or corrupt politicians? TOR is a valuable international tool for peace oriented organizations to survive in hostile dictator/tyrant/communist environments. If this is successful its likely people will die.
Is this just another symptom of law enforcement laziness? Asking ISP's to do the dirty work of suppressing free speech is a method used in communist countries. What authority does Japans NPA have to issue such a deceleration?
What dangerous precedent is being laid here? If the ISP's cave into this then next they will find themselves responsible for it as well as more and more 'requests' are added.
Don't let Japans MPAA or RIAA hear of this or they will 'ask' for the same thing but for their own selfish purposes. Talk about huge mistakes it would be really stupid for any ISP to allow such. It would be a huge expensive mistake. (just look how much google invests in verifying DCMA take-down notices.)
Would complain more but it would sound hypocritical with the US govmt now trying to pass CISPA the end all of end all spying acts. Up next is the govmt bathroom cam with smell sensor. (and it will be a crime if it stinks too much.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also, people committing crimes that have *actual victims* usually leave *physical* tracks.
Most crimes *worth prosecuting* take place at least partially in meatspace. Murder. Burglary. Child abuse. Etc. All leave forensic traces where things were stolen or people were abducted or killed.
The only real biggies that might be done all-online are espionage and wire fraud. Both can be defeated (or at least forced to use more intrusive methods than a port probe run over Tor) by using adequate security on the target machines. If they can't be hacked by sending malicious packets to their public IP addresses, thieves have to physically break in, or at least physically splice cables somewhere or do a drive by WiFi probe looking for an open or WEP router on the wrong side of their firewall.
Wire fraud also has the niggling little issue of how the thief is supposed to get his grubby mitts on the money. Small scale fraud isn't compatible with numbered Swiss accounts and untraceable wire transfers thereto; large scale typically reveals itself when the crook lives above his nominal means afterwards. Petty fraud with online conversion of the gains to ill-gotten Bitcoins might happen in the future at high enough rates to become a big deal, or might not. Credit card number conversion to goods results in stuff having to be shipped somewhere. For that matter, Bitcoin conversion to goods. Bitcoins can be spent somewhat anonymously, but if wire fraud money is transferred to an online brokerage that converts to Bitcoins, this can be discovered, and merchants asked to look for the same Bitcoin hashes, then alert law enforcement to the shipping info provided when "hot" Bitcoins are spent. Like paper bills, Bitcoins have unique serial numbers on them, or they could be counterfeit, and these can be used to track one's travels and link a fraudulent conversion to a goods shipment so the cops can be waiting to pounce at the P.O. box when the ill-gotten goods are collected.
And other than hacking, the *only* activities it's possible to carry out all-online are ones the First Amendment's supposed to protect, and which lack victims.
(Well, cyberbullying maybe has victims, but block/ignore/killfile/unplug is generally sufficient to protect oneself, short of the cyberbully resorting to hacking to bypass the block, whence we're back to securing computers again.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quick question - why haven't the police sought to bring a case against the US Navy? In case you're wondering what this question has to do with anything...they're the people who invented TOR.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reasons
"Over the past several years, the Tor system was abused in a number of crimes including the posting of online murder threats on Internet bulletin boards, theft of money from accounts via illegal accesses to Internet banking sites, postings on dating sites by those seeking relationships with children, and leakages of security information from the Metropolitan Police Department."
I wonder which of those triggered the request to block ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Japan Responds
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are not blocking Tor...
It will be up to the site owner to block Tor or not to block Tor.
This is a direct response to recent incidents where criminals hid behind Tor whie remotely operating bot infected pcs to incriminate the owner of the pcs. If BBSes can choose to limit access from obfuscated sources, it can help reduce inital exposures to the bot software posted on those BBSes.
Note that the implementation of the limitation is totally up to the site admin. The site admin can alternately set flag like "This post was written from Tor", instead of denying access.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Petition
https://www.change.org/petitions/japanese-national-police-agency-npa-reverse-the-recomm endation-to-japanese-isps-to-start-blocking-tor-network
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stop The NPA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am working on something better
[ link to this | view in chronology ]